Laserfiche WebLink
Comments on Bill 122 <br /> Literally reading this bill made me ill, sick to my stomach and my heart pounding; <br /> that is how upsetting it is. It is another sucker punch to the working people who do <br /> the right thing, pay their taxes, hire people and pay them,take care of their <br /> properties and try to work to ensure their future and future retirement. You just <br /> keep adding more and more taxes with NO justification. <br /> First off-this bill was touted as only impacting those not regulated under Bill 108 <br /> (hosted), therefore, it is very confusing as to why it calls for"registering". Permitted <br /> STVRs have registered with the County to get the NCU permit; and are registered <br /> with the GET and TAT and County tax collection system. There is no valid reason to <br /> further invade our privacy rights by requiring yet another registration. <br /> Once Bill 108 went into effect, new unhosted permits were prohibited. I don't think <br /> this is right but it is in effect. So who exactly is supposed to paying the County$1000 <br /> for some "initial registration" and $500 for "initial NUC"?All legal NUC unhosted <br /> STVRs already did that and paid $500 and we currently pay another $250 every <br /> year. This is incidentally one of the most expensive STVR registration fees in the <br /> entire U.S. (see attachment). I do not understand who this is referring to but if it is <br /> intended to make current legal registered STVRs register again and pay as <br /> additional $1500 then this is patently wrong and cannot be implemented. We are <br /> supposed to pay another$500/year for the NCU permit?Absolutely no. Most other <br /> vacation places in the U.S. which require permits do not require annual renewals <br /> with fees. We are not rich people. We should not have to pay annual renewal fees of <br /> $500—we should not even be paying the current$250. <br /> The TAT + GET + County 3% already makes us the MOST expensive "hotel tax" in the <br /> United States. Yet every problem that arises in Hawaii the first thing legislators' <br /> propose is "increase the TAT". It is outrageous and egregious. <br /> You cannot keep applying this one size fits all method of regulating things. In Puna <br /> our STVRs charge around $120/night while those in Kohala charge $1700/night- <br /> we should be treated the same?We already have the highest"hotel' taxes in the <br /> United States at this time. <br /> Why are legislators continuing to blame the small business owners (STVRs) on the <br /> big island for all the ills on the island? STVRs provide a service to the visitors and to <br /> those they employ especially in areas like Puna where there are no hotels. <br /> Our home insurance rates on the big island have doubled for some, like myself, and <br /> others are unable to get insurance at all. Our property taxes increase every year. The <br /> cost to fly to Hilo gets more expensive and much less convenient with United <br /> Airlines no longer serving Hilo. The costs ("commissions") VRBO and AirBnB take <br /> from us increases every year. And now you want to put more of us out of business <br />