My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-02 PL-CCI-2024-000003 Bill 121 Penny Lee Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-22 Leeward Continuance Meeting
>
Item #7 County Council Initiated Bill 121 (PL-CCI-2024-000003)
>
Testimonies 03-27-24 thru 05-21-24
>
2024-04-02 PL-CCI-2024-000003 Bill 121 Penny Lee Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2024 6:02:30 PM
Creation date
5/10/2024 1:19:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
4/2/2024
Description
Bill 121 Penny Lee Testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3. About 46%of the Big Island is state land use "AG" and currently only about 2.2% "Urban". The TAR bill allows <br /> unlimited vacation rentals in resort and commercial zoning and "Project Districts". On the rest of the island, nobody can <br /> operate a vacation rental unless they receive a NUC(Nonconforming Use Certificate). Nonconforming vacation rentals <br /> also have to renew this NUC every year with many requirements,fees and threat of greater than $10,000 fines wielded <br /> at the discretion of the Planning Department. No other NUC needs to be renewed annually. Heather Kimball, during the <br /> introduction of Bill 121 at the county council, repeatedly stressed that the NUC is NOT A PERMIT, and the TAR process <br /> just a "registration".The sworn affidavit requirement is a trap for many. <br /> Now with state bills HB1838 or SB2919 in the legislature that very nonconforming "grandfathered" status becomes <br /> worthless.The bills give the counties the power to eliminate nonconforming uses at any time, specifically just for <br /> vacation rentals only. Why would anybody sign up for a NUC under the TAR bill under these circumstances? For our <br /> families our vacation rentals are usually our biggest investment. How can we count on our vacation rental income when <br /> it can be taken away from us at any time? Hawaii County offers no assurance for continued operation of legal vacation <br /> rentals in the future. <br /> By the way-we are relying on the grandfathering clause for many things, like our non-conforming single-family homes <br /> on AG land and the non-conforming subdivisions with small lots on AG land,for example. Grandfathering is central to <br /> protecting property rights. It's a slippery slope if the county were now to selectively remove the grandfathering of <br /> vacation rentals.The state legislature has said that they would leave the evaluation of legalities to the County,this could <br /> potentially be a large legal liability for the County. <br /> 4.The TAR bill has elaborate rules about where the owner/host of a hosted vacation rental can stay and not stay on their <br /> property. On AG land there are further rules and restrictions. One of the results/goals of all this is to try to ensure that <br /> hosted vacation rentals can not offer a legal cooking facility to their guests. Vacation rentals usually include cooking <br /> facilities, that's what our guests (often families)expect. Considering the many rural and remote areas on the Big Island, <br /> this does not make sense to leave guests stranded to eat crackers and sandwiches? Guests also choose vacation rentals <br /> for privacy. Forcing the owner to be "hovering" around on the same building site is intrusive and the opposite of what <br /> guests want.These rules are strangling the operation of vacation rentals and making them undesirable (on purpose). <br /> 5. Small scale transient accommodations like small business vacation rentals and Bed and Breakfast are much more <br /> appropriate for the Big Island's rural character. Several of the Community Development Plans explicitly mention this. <br /> They offer economic input for otherwise underserved and lower-income areas. Many communities on the island don't <br /> want any Resort development in their areas. If the County is serious about supporting small scale farming on this island <br /> for food sustainability, vacation rentals are a great way to make small farms financially viable. <br /> Interestingly the draft General Plan doesn't mention TARS, STVR or vacation rentals at all (it mentions vacation <br /> rentals/STVR only ONCE). It mentions the word "Resort" 38 times. So this is Hawaii County's plan for the future (2045)? <br /> We often hear "We want vacation rentals only in resort zones" and "We want the champagne tourist"they are all slogans <br /> that lead to one thing: a Monopoly for Corporate Hotels and Resorts. <br /> Somebody needs to work for achieving a balance and reining in the Monopoly of the resort industry. Under the guise of <br /> "Destination Management"the Hotel industry now seems to want to control every beach, reef and scenic point on the <br /> island. With the TAR bill and various related state bills they are pushing local residents out of their vacation rentals all <br /> across the island, while securing and expanding a Monopoly for the Resorts towards owning 100%of the tourist <br /> accommodation market. Leaving little to nothing for the local residents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.