Laserfiche WebLink
0 0Q� 011 MA�t4, J � 0 t) ru e rem s <br />SSUES WITH BILL 121 <br />THERE ARE TOO MANY HIDDEN TRAPS IN <br />THIS BILL AS WRITTEN <br />where as the public has not been given the opportunity to ask questions and learn the <br />meaning and effects of this bill, I have these suggestions to BILL 121 as written: <br />-DEFINE "safety, health and code requirements" which must be signed under penalty <br />of perjury. We MUST know what these codes are in order to not purger ourselves. <br />25-4-16.5(2) must be define BEFORE passage sadly, this seems to have been <br />left up to the planning dept to define <br />*hidden trap* <br />-DEFINE Time Limits to come into compliance of these "requirements" during the <br />application process if denied or need clarification or to legalize portions of the <br />dwellings ... regarding safety, heath and code *hidden trap* How backed up is <br />planning, building currently? <br />-DEFINE `guest limits' or `maximum renter limits' HOW is this determined? By <br />Whom? WHEN? *hidden trap* <br />-DEFINE `parking requirements' Heather Kimbal has verbally stated that parking on <br />a�,acent parcels or nearl ! leased lots would be acceptable yet it is NOT YET in this <br />Bill 121 PLEASE REVISE *hidden trap* <br />-DEFINE "building site" to INCLUDE contiguously landscaped lots owned by same <br />owner *hiddnn tr?n* <br />-DEFINE "ohana" or Accessory dwelling as occupied by owner on adjacent <br />lots <br />-STRIKE 25-4-16.1(a) altogether <br />or at least strike 25-4-16.1(a) `transient accommodation is subordinate <br />and incidental to use as principal home' Large house, single owner doesn't make <br />sense How can one person occupy an entire 3,000 sq ft home with several rooms? <br />perhaps change to 10% of sq ft? *hidden trap* <br />-25-4-16-2(a)2 ADD VACATION NODES AS PROMISED IN "' <br />FEU <br />at� mtg by ,C_OPY <br />J <br />