Laserfiche WebLink
proclamations) in providing residential housing combined with lower rental rates deter many owners from <br /> offering their rentals in the long-term market. <br /> Residents who specialize in servicing such properties, offering maid service, handyman assistance, and <br /> landscaping, especially in rural areas, will be affected. If these individuals have fewer opportunities for <br /> work, they may be compelled to either leave the island or commute long distances for lower-paying <br /> employment. These unintended consequences further hinder residents' ability to secure housing. <br /> Bill 121's exemptions, by focusing on specific professional groups such as nurses and doctors, even as <br /> outlined in state legislation, inadvertently create a discriminatory framework. This selective approach not <br /> only overlooks the broader spectrum of housing needs across various occupational sectors but also fails to <br /> address the overarching housing shortage issue on the island. <br /> OPPOSED to punishing local homeowners with unreasonable fines and fees and processes. <br /> The onerous application process, initial, and renewal fees outlined in this bill, create an undue financial <br /> burden on lower income residents. Fines up to $10,000 in addition to Director imposed fines at twice the <br /> highest advertised daily rate are exorbitant and disproportional to the violations proposed in the bill. <br /> These issues are in direct conflict with existing fines stated in the Hawaii County Chapter 25 which start <br /> at $500 on first offense. Additionally, if a host receives three complaints within a 12-month period, the <br /> TAR/NUC may be suspended for up to two years. This concentration of power, combined with the non- <br /> transparent complaint and appeal process for operators is unreasonable. <br /> The proposed bill's reporting requirements are overly demanding, requiring monthly detailed submissions <br /> not just from large hosting platforms but also from individual owners and small-scale operators, including <br /> 'mom and pop' setups managing direct bookings. This overreaching demand for comprehensive rental <br /> information is impractical and places an unreasonable workload on these services. <br /> OPPOSED to additional regulations in lieu of full enforcement of Ordinance 2018-11.4 <br /> Ordinance 2018-114 (Bill 108) and the resulting Planning Department Rule 23 have had little to no <br /> impact on deterring illegal vacation rentals or curbing non-compliant behavior. The lack of proactive <br /> enforcement measures by the county failed to adequately address the underlying issues that Ordinance <br /> 2018-114 sought to solve. The County has an obligation to actively pursue and terminate illegal transient <br /> rental operations as well as equally enforce existing regulations to protect all residents. This responsibility <br /> extends beyond a complaint-driven enforcement model which only contributes to the erosion of <br /> community character. Until Ordinance 2018-114 is proven effective in preserving the character of our <br /> residential and agricultural areas, reducing speculative investment in properties within these markets, and <br /> adding to housing availability for residents, further regulatory changes should NOT be considered. <br /> For the reasons above, we strongly oppose this legislation and believe a completely different <br /> approach is necessary. <br /> HIR and WHAR are conunitted to working with the County and all interested parties to help create <br /> sensible solutions to the issues inherent in the housing sector. We acknowledge that the solution to <br /> providing attainable, affordable, and workforce housing is not easily achieved. To effectively increase <br /> available housing, the County must remove barriers such as prohibitive zoning, address aging and non- <br /> existent infrastructure, and revise the cumbersome and unreasonable building and energy codes. <br /> Punishing those who have chosen to create business here, pay taxes, create jobs, contribute to their <br /> communities, and call Hawai'i their home is not a solution to the County's need for housing. <br /> Hawaii Island REALTORS® and the West Hawaii Association of REALTORS® adamantly <br /> OPPOSES SILL 121. <br />