My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-04-15 Bill 121 Kristin OFriel
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-05-22 Leeward Continuance Meeting
>
Item #7 County Council Initiated Bill 121 (PL-CCI-2024-000003)
>
Testimonies 03-27-24 thru 05-21-24
>
2024-04-15 Bill 121 Kristin OFriel
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2024 6:10:55 PM
Creation date
5/10/2024 1:19:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Description
Bill 121 Kristin OFriel
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Chairperson Barbara Defranco <br /> Leeward Planning Commission <br /> County of Hawai'i <br /> 25 Aupuni St. <br /> Unit 1502 <br /> Hilo, HI 96720 <br /> Subject: Concerns and Recommendations Regarding Bill 121 <br /> Aloha Chairperson Defranco and Leeward Planning Commission Members, <br /> Thank you for your public service and for considering the viewpoints and concerns <br /> shared by the community regarding Bill 121. <br /> While I appreciate the hard work of the Council members who drafted the bill, and the <br /> stated intent of the bill, I have deep concerns that the proposed legislation fails to <br /> consider how it will impact the economic well-being of Big Island residents in practice. <br /> Recommendation #1: Press pause and conduct an impact study <br /> Tourism is Hawaii's principal industry and legislation that limits the ability of residents to <br /> participate in this economy deserves a nuanced approach that acknowledges and <br /> equitably accounts for the unique circumstances that exist across diverse regions of our <br /> island. Even well-intentioned legislation can have far-reaching unintended <br /> consequences. This would also give affected communities an opportunity to provide <br /> meaningful input proactively rather than reactively. To my knowledge, no public input <br /> was invited during the drafting of this legislation. <br /> Recommendation #2: Maintain the present definition of short term / transient as <br /> thirty consecutive days or less <br /> Owners who rent their homes legally for 31 days or more have a vested right to <br /> continue this existing use. Changing the definition to 180 days would require creating an <br /> avenue for existing rentals to apply for nonconforming use certification. Instead of <br /> creating additional administration for an already complex and cumbersome set of <br /> provisions. I support upholding the present definition of short-term/transient to be a <br /> rental period of thirty consecutive days or less. <br /> Recommendation #3: Remove restrictions about where hosts can live and where <br /> guests can stay <br /> Hosts rely on rental income for their livelihood—they use it to pay their rent, mortgage, <br /> medical bills, an empty nester may have college tuition to cover—any number of <br /> financial hardships could give a host cause to move into a secondary dwelling in order <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.