My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-SMA-2024-000054)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-06-06 Windward
>
Item #2 Punalei Makai Living Trust (PL-SMA-2024-000054)
>
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-SMA-2024-000054)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/23/2024 7:16:19 PM
Creation date
5/23/2024 2:23:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Description
PD RECOMMENDATION REPORT (PL-SMA-2024-000054)
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The development will to the extent feasible, reasonably protect native <br /> Hawaiian rights if they are found to exist. In view of the Hawaii State Supreme <br /> Court's "PASH" and "Ka Pa'akai O Ka'Aina" decisions, the issue relative to native <br /> Hawaiian rights, such as gathering and fishing rights, must be addressed in terms of the <br /> cultural, historical, and natural resources and the associated traditional and customary <br /> practices of the site. <br /> Investigation of valued resources: The project was submitted to the State Historic <br /> Preservation Division (SHPD) for review and recommendations under Ch. 6E-42. The <br /> applicant did not conduct any additional surveys as the subject parcel (created in 1891) <br /> has been used for the cultivation of sugar cane for over 100 years before that use was <br /> abandoned. <br /> The valuable cultural, historical, and natural resources found in the area: <br /> Based on the previous land disturbance from sugar cane cultivation (which was <br /> significant), the extent and location of the proposed project, and lack of public access, it <br /> was determined that there would be no adverse effects to historic sites. No valuable <br /> cultural resources and practices such as shoreline access, fishing, gathering, hunting, or <br /> access to ceremonial sites have been established, and as such would not be adversely <br /> affected in any way by the proposed project. <br /> Based on the nature of development, and the current use of the parcel, there does <br /> not appear to be any potential adverse impacts to traditional and customary practices in <br /> the area. <br /> No floral or faunal species listed as threatened, endangered, or proposed for <br /> listing under the federal or state endangered species statutes were identified on the site. <br /> Additionally, no species used for cultural gathering purposes were identified within the <br /> project area. <br /> Possible adverse effects or impairment of valued resources: Native vegetation <br /> may be destroyed by ground alteration, however, there is no evidence that the flora in the <br /> project area is particularly desired or used for cultural practices. Archaeological remains <br /> could inadvertently be uncovered during construction activities; however, the parcel has <br /> been impacted by past grading and grubbing under sugar cane cultivation and as such, <br /> -9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.