Laserfiche WebLink
coastline. The property is not situated over any natural drainage system or water feature <br /> that would flow into the nearby coastal ecosystem and no floodplains are present in the <br /> affected area. In terms of beach protection, the applicants conducted a Coastal Erosion <br /> Study which concluded that a 65.2-foot minimum setback was appropriate considering <br /> the ongoing erosion along the coast. The applicants propose to exceed that setback by <br /> locating construction to more than 130-feet from the top of pali (shoreline) and as such <br /> the proposed development would not affect any coastal resources nor adversely affect <br /> public use and recreation in this area. <br /> The subject parcels are within an established residential community that both <br /> agricultural and residential uses, as well as the fully developed Hawaiian Paradies Park <br /> located north of the project site. Based on the submittal of the Archaeological Inventory <br /> Survey (AIS) and Cultural Impact Assessment (CIA) it is anticipated that no historic <br /> properties will be affected. Staff submitted the project for review by the State Historic <br /> Preservation Division (SHPD) for a HRS Ch. 6E-42 review; SHPD has not completed the <br /> review request to date. <br /> In reviewing the proposed development against the factors that may constitute a <br /> substantial adverse effect as listed under Planning Commission Rule 9-10 (H) (1-10), it <br /> has been determined that the proposed project as described above will not have a <br /> significant adverse environmental or ecological effect upon the Special Management <br /> Area. <br /> In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26, the proposed <br /> development is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter <br /> 205A-26, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of <br /> the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. <br /> The purpose of Chapter 205A-26, Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) and Rule 9 of <br /> the Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure, is to preserve, protect, and <br /> where possible, to restore the natural resources of the coastal zone areas. Therefore, <br /> special controls on development within an area along the shoreline are necessary to avoid <br /> permanent loss of valuable resources and the foreclosure of management options. The <br /> objectives and policies of Chapter 205A-26, HRS and Rule 9-10(h) include, but are not <br /> limited to, the protection of coastal recreational resources, historic resources, scenic and <br /> 4 <br />