2024-06-17 E. Kalani Flores - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

inconsistent with the updated 2005 General Plan and are purely for speculation purposes at this time. Procedural Errors It is believed that the actions that occurred at the end of June 15, 2023 meeting of the LPC were improper and in violation of regulations and procedural due process for this commission. The afore-mentioned agenda items were voted upon and both motions failed. Then at the end of the second agenda item vote, a staff member informed the commissioners that there was a "no decision because both motions failed"and then recommended that this matter be deferred. It's contended that the staff member gave an improper interpretation of the County Code and inappropriate advice to the commissioners to "defer the hearing to see if votes change at next hearing." In addition,the staff member implied that the commissioners were required to defer this hearing without providing any other options such as no further action. This resulted in the approval of a motion to defer this matter to the next meeting.' However, it's contended that a motion to defer this matter is out of order and that such a motion should have occurred prior to voting and that voting should have also been deferred. It appears that no further action or a motion to reconsider or for continuance should have occurred on this matter since the commission already voted on these agenda items which resulted in a no decision and an unfavorable recommendation. There's a public perception that proper procedures weren't followed in this matter. Based upon the YouTube recording starting near 1:35:30. 5