Laserfiche WebLink
c. The feasible action, if any, to be taken by the Authority to reasonably protect <br /> any valued cultural, historical or natural resources including any existing <br /> traditional and customary native Hawaii rights. <br /> In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26(2)(A), the <br /> proposed development will not have any substantial adverse environmental or <br /> ecological effect, except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable <br /> and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interest. In <br /> considering the significance of potential environmental effects, the Director shall <br /> consider the sum of those effects that adversely affect the quality of the environment and <br /> shall evaluate the overall and cumulative effects of the action on the Special Management <br /> Area. Such adverse effects shall include, but not be limited to, the potential cumulative <br /> impact of individual developments, each one of which taken in itself might not have a <br /> substantial adverse effect and eliminate planning options. <br /> The proposed project did not meet the criteria in State law for the requirement of <br /> an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. While the subject <br /> parcels are located within the Special Management Area, no work is proposed within the <br /> shoreline setback area. Additionally, no work is proposed within the State Right-of-Way <br /> (ROW) and as such,no HRS 343 trigger was identified. <br /> The Project is set back from the coastline by a minimum of 250 feet to the nearest <br /> development, which will be the residence and septic system on Parcel 44. This project <br /> will not affect beach processes, artificially fix the shoreline or interfere with public access <br /> and views to and along the shoreline. Site specific Best Management Practices (`BMPs") <br /> will be developed by the contractor in order to mitigate any potential for project-related <br /> impacts to the nearshore marine environments, inlcuding, but not limited to the use of <br /> construction and silt barriers. <br /> In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A, the proposed <br /> development is consistent with the objectives and policies as provided by Chapter <br /> 205A, HRS, and Special Management Area guidelines contained in Rule No. 9 of the <br /> Planning Commission Rules of Practice and Procedure. <br /> -3- <br />