Laserfiche WebLink
HHF PLANNERS <br /> PLANNING DEPARTMENT,COUNTY OF HAWAII ...12 places for people <br /> F.EXAMPLE PROJECTS WHICH BEST ILLUSTRATE PROPOSED TEAM'S QUALIFICATIONS 20.EXAMPLE PROJECT KEY <br /> FOR THIS SERVICE CATEGORY NUMBER <br /> (Present as many projects as requested by the agency,or 10 projects,if not specified. <br /> Complete one Section F for each project.) 2 <br /> 21.TITLE AND LOCATION(City and State) 22.YEAR COMPLETED <br /> Pu'uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSTRUCTION(If applicable) <br /> Remove& Replace Park Maintenance Facilities EA Ongoing n/a <br /> Honaunau-Napo`opo`o, Hawaii Island <br /> 23.PROJECT OWNER'S INFORMATION <br /> a.PROJECT OWNER b.POINT OF CONTACT NAME c.POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE NUMBER <br /> Hennebery Eddy Architects Will Ives,AIA (503) 227-4860 <br /> for National Park Service <br /> 24.BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AND RELEVANCE TO THIS SERVICE CATEGORY(Include scope,size,and cost) <br /> HHF prepared a Federal National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA) <br /> Environmental Assessment(EA)for a project to relocate existing <br /> Pu'uhonua o Honaunau National Historical Park maintenance and n� � -~- , EN;RANCE �. <br /> resource management functions from their current location in PUURONUA 4, <br /> - ITE;F EN R\ <br /> substandard facilities in an area known to contain archeological y °KP <br /> �... NS E � f <br /> resources to new facilities at a more suitable location.The seven <br /> existing structures were constructed as temporary facilities in the ' <br /> 1960s and are no longer physically adequate to meet current Park <br /> PICNIC AREA <br /> needs.Their location does not support the Park's fundamental <br /> Fq(ILTl o� <br /> resources and values as expressed in its cultural landscape. • <br /> \'� <br /> HHF evaluated impacts on key environmental issue areas in three <br /> NPS-owned project sites(two within the main Park boundaries `aw — \411FTH <br /> i0COASTAL TRAIL J <br /> and one site three miles mauka); prepared materials in support ofke, <br /> the project's Endangered Species Act Section 7 consultation; <br /> prepared NEPA scoping meeting graphic materials;and oversaw <br /> biological surveys of all three sites. <br /> Project Cost:$137,906 4 <br /> S A ��.Sg6 �e <br /> 04.; <br /> Air FT t" <br /> 25.FIRMS INVOLVED WITH THIS PROJECT <br /> (1) FIRM NAME 2) FIRM LOCATION(City and State) (3) ROLE <br /> a. AECOS, Inc. Honolulu, Hawai`i Biological Resources Survey <br /> 18 <br />