My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-09-16 Robbie Roosen Testimony #4 -Oppose
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-09-19 Leeward
>
Item #4 Initiator Planning Director (PL-PDI-2024-000008)
>
LPC Testimony 9/13-9/18
>
2024-09-16 Robbie Roosen Testimony #4 -Oppose
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2024 1:27:22 PM
Creation date
9/16/2024 1:27:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
9/16/2024
Description
Email Testimony Opposed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Increased RF radiation exposure: Cell towers emit RF radiation, <br />which can increase daily exposure levels, particularly for individuals <br />living or working near these structures. Children, due to their smaller <br />size and developing bodies, may be more vulnerable to RF radiation <br />absorption and potential health effects. <br />Distance and exposure levels: The distance between a cell tower <br />and an individual, as well as the power output of the tower, can <br />affect exposure levels. <br />The paper linked below was conducted in 1994 by Rome Laboratory Air Force <br />Materiel Command regarding safety of radio frequencies on human and animal <br />health. <br />Conclusion: <br />"Exposure to RF/MW radiation is known to have a biological effect on living <br />organisms. Research conducted over the past 30 years (since 1994) has provided a <br />basis for the effect of irradiation of biological materials. Experimental evidence has <br />shown that exposure to low intensity radiation can have a profound effect on <br />biological organisms. The nonthermal effects of RF/MW radiation exposure are <br />becoming important measures of biological interaction with EM fields. Modem <br />RF/MW radiation protection guides have sought to account for the effects of low level <br />radiation exposure. Adherence to the ANSI Standard \[9\] should provide protection <br />against harmful thermal effects and help to minimize the interaction of EM fields with <br />the biological processes of the human body \[9\]. It is essentially the absorption of <br />RF/MW energy that causes stress and trauma to biological systems. The greatest <br />amount of energy will be absorbed when the incident radiation is emitted at the <br />resonance frequency of biological material \[9\], \[22\]. In this regard, RF/MW radiation <br />emitted at non-resonant frequencies should be absorbed to the greatest extent when <br />the radiating mode is a pulsed signal. The generation of such signals creates <br />transient responses that will match the resonant frequencies of biological materials. <br />Non-resonant pulsed RF/MW radiation may be more harmful to living organisms than <br />CW radiation emitted at non-resonant frequencies." <br />https://www.elettrosensibili.it/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/rf-microwave-radiation- <br />biological-effects-rome-labs-1.pdf?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email <br />From The Invisible Rainbow pages 364-365 by Arthur Firstenberg <br />"The suddenness and simultaneity of aspen decline through out Colorado, <br />which began precisely in 2004, has been a source of wonder and despair <br />to all who love and miss the vivid fall colors of these striking trees. In just <br />three years, from 2003 to 2006, the area of aspen damage increased from <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.