My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-09-24 PL-INT-2024-008732 GP 2045 Draft Comments - B. Masters
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Plan
>
2015 Comp Update
>
Public Input
>
2024 Draft Public Comments
>
2024-09-24 PL-INT-2024-008732 GP 2045 Draft Comments - B. Masters
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2024 8:02:42 AM
Creation date
9/24/2024 3:54:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
"At any given place, traditionally, sea level is measured by what are called tide <br /> gauges: a stick in the water, basically. Two things that change are what a tide <br /> gauge shows: the land moving up and down and the sea moving up and down. In <br /> most places, it's the land that has the biggest effect, and so you don't have a <br /> good measure of sea level rise141." <br /> Let's review the danger of water rising and engulfing coastline towns. Is there one city or <br /> town on the shoreline that is in danger of being underwater? Is Venice, a town that lives at sea <br /> level, in danger of being lost to the sea? Have home insurance companies stopped giving <br /> insurance policies to homeowners who live on the coastline because they'll soon be <br /> underwater? The answer would be no! <br /> On August 21, 2020, NASA published an article titled "NASA-led Study Reveals the Causes of <br /> Sea Level Rise Since 1900." It reads: <br /> "Sea levels have risen on average 1.6 millimeters (0.063 inches) per year <br /> between 1900 and 20184." <br /> That means the sea level has risen a little over 7.4 inches in the last 118 years! Does that show <br /> the world is in danger of being engulfed by water? No. It shows that it will be a very, very, very <br /> long time before humans are in danger. Does that mean documentaries like "An Inconvenient <br /> Truth" are telling lies? <br /> An article was published in the Seattle Times on October 12, 2007, titled "British judge ruled the <br /> Oscar-winning film on global warming, "An Inconvenient Truth," contains "nine errors5."" <br /> Here is the list of inaccuracies found in Court taken from the "Friends Of Science" website6. <br /> The inaccuracies in the documentary include: <br /> 1. The film claims that melting snow s on Mount Kilimanjaro evidence global warming. The <br /> Government's expert was forced to concede that this is not correct. <br /> 2. The film suggests that evidence from ice cores proves that rising CO2 levels cause <br /> temperature increases over 650,000 years. The Court found that the film was misleading: over <br /> that period, the rises in CO2 lagged behind the temperature rises by 800-2,000 years. <br /> "NASA-led Study Reveals the Causes of Sea Level Rise Since 1900,"by Ian J. O'Neill/ Jane J.Lee,August 21, <br /> 2020. https://climate.nasa.gov/news/3012/nasa-led-study-reveals-the-causes-of-sea-level-rise-since-1900/ <br /> 'Truth is, Gore film has 9 errors,British judge rules,"by Mary Jordan,Oct 12,2007. <br /> https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/truth-is-pore-film-has-9-errors-british-judge-rules/ <br /> 6"Inaccuracies in Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth-A Ruling of the British High Court" <br /> https://friendsofscience.org/assets/documents/FOS%20EssayBritish High Court Ruling_on An Inconvenient Tru <br /> th.html <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.