My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008822 GP 2045 Draft Comments - T. Keeney
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Plan
>
2015 Comp Update
>
Public Input
>
2024 Draft Public Comments
>
2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008822 GP 2045 Draft Comments - T. Keeney
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 10:51:01 AM
Creation date
9/26/2024 10:04:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
P. 17. Support the achievement of 70 percent renewable energy for the electricity sector by <br /> 2030, with 40 percent from renewables and 30 percent from efficiency, and 100 precent by <br /> 2045. <br /> Comment: The language here is misleading. If one is advocating for 70% of electricity <br /> generation from renewable energy, that is contrary to 40% of generation is from renewables <br /> and there has been a 30% gain in efficiency. Please explain the meaning of this directive. Is <br /> this merely a rationalization for failure to meet a 70% renewables goal by 2030. <br /> P. 20. Adopt a land acquisition program with potential leaseback options for the purchase of <br /> hazard-prone locations or those with beneficial attributes for climate adaptation or mitigation. <br /> Comment: This is not something that the public will bear. This feels like collusion between <br /> corporate or wealthy land owners and Administration. This is a directive which must be taken <br /> to the public in the form of a referendum before it is placed in the General Plan. This certainly <br /> would be reason for the County Council to defer ratification of the Draft General Plan. <br /> Proposals with this level of controversy should not be placed in the General Plan until they are <br /> taken to the people by referendum or, at least, the County Council. <br /> SUSTAINABLE GROWTH AND RESILIENT COMMUNITIES <br /> P24. Over the next 25 years, the population growth rate is expected to decline from an <br /> average of 2.3% per annum to about 0.9% per annum. In 2045 the resident population is <br /> forecast to be approximately 273,000 which is a 35% increase over 2018. <br /> Comment: Please explain the reason for this decline in population growth rate.. <br /> P. 24. About 90% of growth on average is through immigration. <br /> Comment: Many people have concern that 90% of growth is from immigration. That concern <br /> rises to the level that many people feel that growth is not a good thing but in fact is damaging <br /> to the environment and our social structure. The proposal that Affordable housing permits and <br /> inspection should always be placed at the head of the queue of projects in the Building <br /> Division might help somewhat. Growth in housing development other than affordable housing <br /> or housing for heritage residents should be discouraged, and domestic agriculture should be <br /> emphasized for the purpose of resiliency. <br /> P. 24. In 2018, 67,000 Hawaii State residents moved to the mainland; they were partially <br /> replaced by 54,000 mainlanders who moved to the State for a net out migration from Hawaii of <br /> 13,000. <br /> Comment: This problem might be improved by improving the attractiveness to the Developers <br /> of building Affordable Housing with modest discouragement toward building upscale homes. <br /> This might be accomplished by moving all Affordable projects to the head of the queue for <br /> permit review and building inspection. <br /> P. 24. The population over age 65 is expected to grow to 44% by the year 2045. In 2020, the <br /> largest cohort of the population was between the ages of 60 to 69. <br /> Comment: All of the above statistics need illumination. The domination of this population age <br /> cohort seems unworkable. The influx of retirement age immigrants is a challenge to our <br /> societal structure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.