2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008818 GP 2045 Draft Comments - M. Cummings

Home

Whereas, Climate Change has not been publicly discussed or debated here in Hawaii County which would necessarily require town hall presentations and debates allowing the required time to review All available scientific data to evaluate in order to make any decisions whatsoever in its regard so until your constituents have been given a proper platform for said discussions to better educate their representatives and related agencies who are lacking in this department, the plan will be therefore rejected. Whereas, I am not in point of fact a climate change denier being educated about the fact that the climate has always been changing, is changing now and will always be changing and so rebuke any such accusations or labels as `Climate change denier' or `Conspiracy theorist' aimed at dismissing or silencing my valid concerns, especially given this tactic's illustrious history often resulting in increased governmental overreach, censorship and the centralization of power out of the hands of the People who pay the Planning Commission and all governmental bodies to protect them and so will be therefore rejected. Whereas, If this plan is based on the before mentioned premise of alleged climate change due to fossil fuel consumption which is thus far hearsay, it would therefore logically necessitate the Planning Commission to first, reduce the amount of said pollution by reducing the amount it presently allows and even facilitates by the world's number one polluter, the United States Military before proposing to limit the rights of minuscule offenders, your constituents if in fact the concern for the health and safety of Hawai'i and Her residents, visitors, land, air, water, sea and food supply is genuine so until such efforts are made a priority to mitigate all other main offenders/polluters of our Aina and ourselves, the plan will be therefore rejected. Whereas, Any document that shows such blatant disregard for the clearly defined parameters and duties within our Hawai'i County Charter for All government employees who are all beholden to it by oath will be therefore rejected. Whereas, The plan does not reflect the dire needs of this community nor its aspirations or God given rights but rather, the Planning Commission's affiliation with UN, WHO, WEF and outside corporate interests whose intentions are bent on global governance in a 'Pact for the future' that is poised to over ride the sovereignty of the United States, the Hawaiian Kingdom and every country who submits to the dictates of these unelected officials operating outside their jurisdiction and standing in direct opposition to the real needs, real priorities and real rights of your constituents and will be therefore rejected. Mahalo for your consideration, Millicent Cummings 3