My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008840 GP 2045 Draft Comments - E. Dunn
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
General Plan
>
2015 Comp Update
>
Public Input
>
2024 Draft Public Comments
>
2024-09-26 PL-INT-2024-008840 GP 2045 Draft Comments - E. Dunn
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/1/2024 12:56:14 PM
Creation date
10/1/2024 10:03:38 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
bringing people into the decision making process, I'm appalled, and it does't happen now. Why <br /> would I (or anyone else) believe it will happen in the future? <br /> Please see my hand written comments on Pages 40-48 of the attachment. I have too many <br /> comments to type here, and have scanned these pages. If you have questions about my <br /> comments, pease feel free to email me. <br /> Chapter 3 - Addressing Climate Change for Island-Wide Health <br /> This is a great chapter, and it feels like this is an insert that is now included in all General Plans. <br /> It is written very differently than the rest of the General Plan, and is very scientific. Not that <br /> that's a bad thing. It just feels very different, and doesn't quite fit with the rest of this draft <br /> document. <br /> Page 66: Under Conservation, my comment is that cesspools have to be removed immediately. <br /> I live 1/2 to 3/4 of a mile above Ali'i Drive. I'm still dismayed that the Leeward Planning <br /> Commission allowed a property owner to change a single family house into a bed and <br /> breakfast, and all the effluent discharges directly into the ocean. How gross. If the County really <br /> wanted to show it's serious about cesspool conversion, it would adopt a moratorium on these <br /> kind of commercialization of uses, and not allow an intensification of land uses until cesspools <br /> are removed, and a realistic long term solution to sewer connection is adopted and funded by <br /> Hawai'i County. Have a backbone people. The ocean can heal itself but we need to help. <br /> Please see my hand written comments on Pages 67-71 of the attachment. I have too many <br /> comments to type here, and have scanned these pages. If you have questions about my <br /> comments, please feel free to email me. <br /> Chapter 4 - Sustainable Development and Resilient Communities <br /> The introduction in 4.1.1 is really good. It's written very well, and is a clear, and easy to <br /> understand presentation of land use planning. Good job!! <br /> Table 16: The information is Changing and Aging Population is surprising, in terms of the <br /> projected population growth rate of Hawai'i Island. If there's a way to summarize the population <br /> shift (in and out migration), demographic changes (Island population growth rate, birth and <br /> death rates, and an aging population), that would really get the point across about the types of <br /> demographic changes the island has and is expected to experience. Even more critical is the <br /> overall growth rate - 35% by 2045? That's a huge figure, and needs to be planned for now with <br /> the island infrastructure of roads, water delivery, wastewater treatment plant and landfills <br /> expansions, schools, and all levels of hospitals and clinics. <br /> Table 17: Infrastructure. Second bullet. What can be done at the state level to remove the state <br /> from being involved in County land use issues? Why is the state still involved in these issues? <br /> That power should be fully delegated to the locals so the four counties can plan for their own <br /> future without working through the state process, especially if that's an impediment for any <br /> hearings or approval at the state level. Is there the political will to consider doing this? Is it <br /> possible or it this an issue that the State won't release its grip on. <br /> Third bullet: What is meant by the "desired density"? I find this kind of language to be troubling <br /> as it is quantitative and not qualitative. Please consider terms that are more descriptive without <br /> being so restrictive to future plans, and the larger political decision making process (Planning <br /> Commission and County Council actions). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.