My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-01 Chuck Flaherty Testimony GP 2045 2 of 2
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-11-04 Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
WPC Testimony 10-29-2024-11-04-2024 (28)
>
2024-11-01 Chuck Flaherty Testimony GP 2045 2 of 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2024 4:00:48 PM
Creation date
11/1/2024 3:59:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/1/2024
Description
Email Testimony 2 of 2
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hawaii County Scenic Resources Inventory and Mapping Project <br /> <br />documenting and evaluating scenic resource impacts; and 4) standards for determining <br />levels of acceptable impact. Maui County could also better protect its scenic resources <br />through on-going training of Planning Department staff, UDRB and the Planning <br />Commission in scenic resource impact evaluation and mitigation. <br /> <br />!¯¯«¨¢ ¡¨«¨³¸ ³® ( ¶ ¨¨ #®´³¸ <br /> <br />Much of an development has been subject to SMA Permitting, which requires <br />consistency with the SMA objectives and policies. However, the lack of a defined <br />process with supporting procedures, criteria and standards together with training has <br />resulted in only l scenic resources. Any scenic <br />resources protection program implemented by Hawaii County should ensure that such <br />program weaknesses are not apparent. <br />It is important to note that w urban lands are located within <br />the SMA, a larger portion are not. In addition, because of its vast and rural nature, <br />ounty are mountain (mauka) or <br />agricultural views. Therefore, developments in these areas are not subject to SMA <br />permitting requirements. <br />For example, the inventory and mapping study identified many important and <br />exceptional views in urban areas, such as the Hilo and Waimea views below that are <br />not located in the SMA. <br />boundary to include some of the coastal exceptional and important views, provided that <br /> <br />Hilo and Waimea urban views. <br /> <br />Scenic Resource Protection Programs and Strategies Page | 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.