Laserfiche WebLink
one no(Vitousek), and one absent and excused(Kanuha). Chairman Vitousek clarified <br /> that the commission would still accept public testimony. <br /> 3) Include making clerical revisions to permitted uses in the Family Agricultural zoning <br /> district in New Business item 6: <br /> A motion to adopt the amendment was moved by Commissioner Carr Smith and <br /> seconded by Commissioner Newberg. A vote was taken by show of hands, and the <br /> motion carried with five ayes (Carr Smith,Newberg, DeFranco,Yates, and Vitousek), <br /> one no (Van Pernis), and one absent and excused (Kanuha). <br /> The discussion ended at 10:37 a.m. [SEE DISCUSSION TRANSCRIPT—EXHIBIT A] <br /> Chairman Vitousek at this time called upon Commissioners DeFranco and Van Pernis to make <br /> their disclosure statements concerning New Business item 1, ARNOLD RABIN (SPP 21- <br /> 000224). Commissioner DeFranco stated that she knew Applicant Mr. Rabin personally and his <br /> wife was currently working for her,but that she felt that she would be able to make an impartial <br /> decision on this matter. No one raised objections to Commissioner DeFranco's participation in <br /> this agenda item. Commissioner Van Pernis stated that he had as an attorney represented <br /> Applicant Mr. Rabin in a variety of matters years ago, and that he considered Mr. Rabin a friend. <br /> He recused himself from this agenda item for the reason that his relationship with the applicant <br /> would prevent him from being fair and impartial, Chairman Vitousek accepted his recusal. <br /> STATEMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC ON AGENDA ITEMS <br /> Chairman Vitousek called upon public testifiers, explained the procedure,and swore them in to <br /> tell the truth in their testimony. <br /> At 10:40 a.m. five individuals provided statements regarding New Business item 2, the <br /> application of.IEKATERINA MYSIN(SMA 21-000078). The testimony ended at 1 1:04 a.m. <br /> [SEE HEARING TRANSCRIPT—EXHIBIT B] <br /> There was a connectivity problem with next testifiers. At 11:07 a.m. Chairman Vitousek called a <br /> recess to address the problem. He called the meeting back to order at 11:15 a.m. <br /> At 11:15 a.m. Six individuals provided statements regarding New Business items 3 and 4, the <br /> applications of TIMOTHY JOSEPH WARD& KAY LYNN WARD (SLU 21-0000561REZ <br /> 21-000246). The testimony ended at 1 1:36 a.m. [SEE HEARING TRANSCRIPT—EXHIBIT C] <br /> It was moved by Commissioner Yates and seconded by Commissioner Carr Smith that public <br /> testimony be closed. A vote was taken by show of hands, and the motion carried with five ayes <br /> (Yates, Carr Smith,DeFranco,Newberg, and Vitousek), no noes, and one absent and excused <br /> (Kanuha). Commissioner Van Perris voted neither for nor against the motion. <br /> 3 <br /> Leeward Planning Commission <br /> May 20,2021,Meeting Minutes <br />