My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2021-03-23 George Smith, Ala Ka La AOAO CCH Petition
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-11-21 Leeward
>
Item #1 Jekaterina Mysin SMA-2021-000078
>
Record Documents 03-23-2021 thru 09-16-2021
>
2021-03-23 George Smith, Ala Ka La AOAO CCH Petition
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2024 11:49:30 AM
Creation date
11/9/2024 11:49:25 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MAUKA <br /> 75-6143 private residence 60' <br /> UNKNOWN AM Gardens entry 20' <br /> MAKAI <br /> 75-6126 condominium 20' <br /> 75-6128 condominium 22' <br /> 75-6138 subdivision 29' <br /> 75-6150 * Ala Ka La condo 10' (no gate), our only entry, 10' wide easement <br /> 75-6156 private residence 12' (no gate) <br /> 75-6126 private residence 20' <br /> 75-6126 private residence 29' <br /> 75-6126 private residence 22' <br /> * Shoreline Access, aka Old Canoe Road, Royal Patent by Kauikeaouli.Although we are only required a <br /> 5' wide pedestrian accessway, historically vehicles enter, unload/load while parking on the street, and <br /> we support that community use. <br /> B. NO <br /> C. YES Our property was surveyed by Wes Thomas in 2018.The project survey, recently done by <br /> unknown surveyor, does not agree, placing some of our property, including our power/comm. Utility <br /> pole within applicant's declared property.Thomas states their survey is correct. Until that dispute is <br /> resolved, we assert that the applicant is planning to build partially on our property. Part of the disputed <br /> area consists of a large lava dome,that varies from 3'6"to 5'6" height above grade.The applicant <br /> proposes a swimming pool in this location. It would seem impossible to remove this natural feature <br /> without destroying our portion, and resulting in the loss of our power pole (regardless of which side of <br /> the line it is situated on). <br /> D. NO <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.