PD Recommendation Report (SMA 21-000078)

Home

each one of which taken in itself might not have a substantial adverse effect, and the elimination of planning options. (B) That the development is consistent with the objectives, policies, and Special Management Area guidelines of this chapter and any guidelines enacted by the legislature; and (C) That the development is consistent with the county general plan and zoning. Such a finding of consistency does not preclude concurrent processing where a general plan or zoning amendment may also be required. In review of the SMA guidelines as listed under HRS 205A-26(2) (A) above, the proposed development of the subject parcel will not have any significant adverse environmental or ecological effect, except as such adverse effect is minimized to the extent practicable and clearly outweighed by public health, safety, or compelling public interest. In considering the significance of potential environmental effects, the Deputy Director shall consider the sum of those effects that adversely affect the quality of the environment and shall evaluate the overall and cumulative effects of the action. Such adverse effect shall include, but not be limited to, the potential cumulative impact of individual developments, each one of which taken might not have a substantial adverse effect and elimination of planning options. A "substantial adverse effect" is determined by the specific circumstances of the proposed use, activity, or operation. In determining whether a proposal may have a substantial adverse effect on the environment, the Deputy Director shall consider every phase of a proposed action and expected consequences, either primary or secondary, or the cumulative as well as short or long-term effect of the proposal. The project has been reviewed against the factors that may constitute a substantial adverse effect as listed under Planning Commission Rule 9-10(H) (1 though 10): (1) involves an irrevocable commitment to loss or destruction of any natural or cultural resource, including but not limited to, historic sites and viewplanes outlined in the General Plan or other adopted plans. (2) curtails the range of beneficial uses of the environment. (3) conflicts with the long-term environmental policies or goals of the General Plan or the State Plan. -2-