My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024_09_17 Game Management Advisory Commission DRAFT Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Office of the Mayor
>
Game Management Advisory Commission
>
Meeting Packets - 2024
>
2024_11_19 GMAC Meeting Packet
>
2024_09_17 Game Management Advisory Commission DRAFT Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/12/2024 1:33:43 PM
Creation date
11/12/2024 1:33:38 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />primarily manta rays but there’s others and, the other stakeholder at the table is <br />Kamehameha Bishop Estates, which essentially owns the bay and they have a plan <br />together to kind of essentially re-work the bay which includes putting parking areas for <br />the commercial operations which are now are a problem. But the controversial part of <br />that is that they also want to put in a sort of hotel/bungalows so, you know, essentially <br />for us to move forward on this we’d want to get a heads up on the manta ray business. <br />Manta ray business, essentially what happened to fishers is that DOBOR – Division of <br />Boating – eliminated fishing from their mandate. They had two mandates which was <br />recreational boating and promote fishing. They eliminated fishing. So now they’re just <br />recreational boating and with recreational boating it – they are only focused on <br />commercial because they get a monthly fee, but they also get a percentage of the <br />revenues. So essentially that’s kind of some of the situation of what’s happening in <br />Keauhou. <br /> <br />IK: Do you guys want to add that to the next agenda item for like further discussion or <br />possible… <br /> <br />RD: I think actually, yeah, I think actually the process, once it’s put in – cause this was a <br />permitted inter-action group… <br /> <br />IK: Oh, oh, OK, then. <br /> <br />RD: Yeah, so once the… <br /> <br />.IK: Well, investigative group… <br /> <br />RD: Investigative group, yes, exactly so… <br /> <br />IK: OK. Sorry… I’m just coming in, so I don’t really know the history so... <br /> <br />RD: Yeah, yeah, first month, it just sent in so we kinda take a look at it… <br /> <br />IK: Yeah. First meeting is you create the PIG so next meeting if anyone wants to create a <br />PIG for whatever issue that comes up – that would – you could do that, and then the <br />next meeting would be to provide a report and the third meeting would have the <br />discussion, unless you need more time to investigate. <br /> <br />LT: Thank you very much, ah, for that report. <br /> <br />8. NEXT MEETING AGENDA ITEMS: <br /> <br />a. Open Forum: Public comments on issues not on the current agenda for consideration <br />for GMAC’s agenda at the next meeting. <br />24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.