Laserfiche WebLink
Comm. 24-057 <br /> 2025 Grant Scoring Rubric <br /> Program/Service Details <br /> 1. The organization's mission statement(s)is clear and relevant to the specific <br /> program/service seeking funding. <br /> Strongly Disagree (1) Somewhat Somewhat Agree (4) Strongly <br /> Disagree 0 Disagree 2 Agree 3 Agree 5 <br /> Notes: <br /> 2. The information provided by the applicant provided evidence of organizational <br /> experience, knowledge, and capacity to carry out the project within the project year, and <br /> within budget. <br /> Strongly Disagree (1) Somewhat Somewhat Agree (4) Strongly <br /> Disagree 0 Disagree 2 Agree 3 Agree 5 <br /> Notes: <br /> 3. The project for which funding is requested is described clearly and comprehensively, <br /> aligns with the objectives of the PONC Maintenance Fund Grant program, and <br /> demonstrates direct benefits to the preserved property. <br /> Strongly Disagree (4) Somewhat Somewhat Agree (16) Strongly <br /> Disagree 0 Disagree 8 Agree 12 Agree 20 <br /> Notes: <br /> Program/Service Objectives and Performance <br /> 4. How the project will benefit and preserve the property has been clearly and <br /> comprehensively explained. <br /> Strongly Disagree (2) Somewhat Somewhat Agree (8) Strongly <br /> Disagree 0 Disagree 4 Agree 6 Agree 10 <br /> Notes: <br /> 5. The activities are clearly outlined, feasible, and aligned with the purpose of the Fund. <br /> Strongly Disagree (2) Somewhat Somewhat Agree (8) Strongly <br /> Disagree 0 Disagree 4 Agree 6 Agree 10 <br /> Notes: <br />