Laserfiche WebLink
subdivisions have associations, and this association will have limited duties such as <br /> maintaining the properties with two burial sites, a 5,000-foot park, the entrance of Naniloa, <br /> and open spaces that are common areas. The association will honor any cultural resources or <br /> descendant visits. It will be a limited association. The developer will write the association <br /> rules and commitments, but once 50 percent of the units are sold, the association will slowly <br /> transition to the owners until all units are sold. Preservation rules and commitments will be in <br /> place before the association transitions completely to unit owners. <br /> Commissioner Lui pointed out that from a young age, her grandfather taught her that the <br /> water flows underground. The Planning Department's Background Report number 4 [sic], <br /> Proposed Development regarding water mentions, "additional parcels will set aside either as <br /> an archaeological preserve,park and open space," but wonders if it should say park and/or <br /> open space. Number 34, Description of the Property, Water, identifies two archaeological <br /> sites and states that open space will not be needing water. Mr. Van Bergen provided <br /> clarification explaining that the subdivision will be under a master meter. This means the <br /> water will come off of the Department of Water Supply waterline, into a master meter, then <br /> directed to the units which includes irrigation for the open space, burial, and small park. The <br /> number of units allocated dictates how many structures can be built. He stated what <br /> Commissioner Lui read refers to two different things, and admits it is not worded well in the <br /> document. <br /> Mr. Plunkett encouraged commissioners to think about their next steps and suggested they <br /> review for what was requested and review the rules and allowable procedures. He offered to <br /> provide a slide to remind commissioners of their options. <br /> Commissioner Lui asked about access for lineal descendants. SHPD cultural branch has not <br /> been doing their due diligence and has not been sharing names of individuals who have been <br /> recognized. It is not entirely the archaeologist's fault as SHPD should provide the list of all <br /> recognized descendants of the ahupua'a. She feels that a list should also be provided to the <br /> County. She feels that community meetings for sensitive areas should be held, and because <br /> not everyone reads the newspaper, she feels that a billboard should be posted in the area to <br /> alert people about the project. <br /> Mr. Plunkett shared his screen providing an overview of CRC policies and rules, and possible <br /> CRC action options. He stated that the two things the commission can vote on at this hearing <br /> are the level of impact and possible modifications, mitigation measures, or suggestions to the <br /> proposal. <br /> Despite not having enough consultation with lineal descendants, Commissioner Kinney asked <br /> what mitigation measures were taken to deal with the impacts. Mr. Van Bergen replied that he <br /> became involved in the project in 2017. The reports had already been out for a while, and the <br /> focus at that time was rezoning ordinances and SHPD approved preservation plans. No <br /> measures were purposely skipped. Mr. Van Bergen assured the commission that the owners <br /> are open to implement what is fair and needed because they are culturally sensitive. He shared <br /> with the commission his personal connection with local families to express his desire to be <br /> culturally sensitive. He asked how the developers can honor the recommendations of the CRC <br /> Page 11 of 14 <br /> Cultural Resources Commission <br /> June 8,2022 <br />