Laserfiche WebLink
with the site and stated that there is a wealth of deposits in the area from Ali`i to Kuakini. She <br /> pointed out several nearby sites with identified archeological sites to support her request for <br /> consideration of how development would affect the Kona community, and to keep the artifacts in <br /> its current condition. She stated that the parcel makai is intended for and received an approval for <br /> a road and reported that there were no members of the public in favor of the proposal at the <br /> Planning Commission hearing in April. The developer did not work with any cultural or lineal <br /> descendants of the area and the development team could not respond to whether cultural or lineal <br /> descendants were recognized for this project. She would like the staff and commission to ensure <br /> that lineal and cultural descendants are contacted to work directly with these development <br /> applications, and that development proposals come to the Cultural Commission first,before the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> Louis Barrere provided in-person testimony and began by stating that he moved to the area three <br /> years ago. He has educated himself on the culture of the area and was aghast to discover how <br /> much desecration has occurred with native Hawaiian burial grounds and sacred sites. He believes <br /> these cultural sites should be kept sacred. Development around or on top, and relocation of <br /> cultural sites is a horrible thing to do. He feels that so much disturbance of burial sites and sacred <br /> places has taken place in the past and not building where burial sites are located is respectful. It is <br /> his understanding that the Planning Commission gets the applications before the Cultural <br /> Resources Commission has a chance to review them. He added that water pressure is very low and <br /> wonders why large developments are getting approved when there may not be water or sewer <br /> services to support it. Many projects have been approved that are beyond the capacity of sewer <br /> and water, which he feels is absurd. He would like to see sacred sites remain sacred. <br /> Clare Loprissi began her in-person testimony in 'Melo no`eau and informed the commission that <br /> this is her 50th year helping deliver babies (YouTube timestamp 13:25). She expressed that it is <br /> disgraceful that the Kuakini Wall is even being discussed and that it is hewa. She doesn't know <br /> any Hawaiian who is comfortable with the ramifications of digging up the iwi. She believes there <br /> needs to be an EIS, although the time for an EIS has passed several years ago. She expressed that <br /> the area is kapu and that the iwi and ki`i are always together. She feels that an EIS needs to be <br /> reopened. She stated that if you are not aware of generational trauma and cultural sensitivity and <br /> the effects of that on children and generations to come, this will have a deep effect. She mentioned <br /> Hawaiian Homelands and how packed the people are in the area. Ms. Loprissi ended her testimony <br /> warning the commission that it is necessary to ensure the archaeologists are not paid off when an <br /> EIS is done because she knows that archaeologists have quit in the past because they were told <br /> they would lose their jobs if they did not comply. <br /> Upon concluding the in-person testimony, the commission heard from individuals providing <br /> online Zoom testimony. Janet Matlock provided her testimony. She began by stating that she is a <br /> resident of Kailua-Kona, not far from the parcel in discussion. She informed the Commission that <br /> she also provided written testimony about the importance of the entire surrounding area as a <br /> whole, not parcel by parcel to understand what will be lost, including the potential desecration and <br /> destruction of the great wall of Kuakini. She encouraged the recognition of decisions made over a <br /> decade and a half ago as they are no longer respectful of the challenges faced by the island and the <br /> world today. She also cautioned to consider carefully whether the developer will be able to follow <br /> through on their promises. The County of Hawai`i Property Tax website showed that this parcel <br /> Page 2 of 14 <br /> Cultural Resources Commission <br /> June 8,2022 <br />