My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-1 Chuck Flaherty Testimony GP 2045 2 of 2
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-12-05 Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-11-04 Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting - Biocultural/Climate Change
>
WPC Testimony 11/1-11/4
>
2024-11-1 Chuck Flaherty Testimony GP 2045 2 of 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2024 4:00:48 PM
Creation date
11/27/2024 1:07:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/1/2024
Description
Email Testimony 2 of 2
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
314
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Hawaii County Scenic Resources Inventory and Mapping Project <br /> <br />Visual Impact Assessment Techniques <br /> <br />As documented in this report, visual impact assessment should be preceded by <br />documenting the scenic resources to be protected. Thereafter, criteria and/or <br />guidelines should be developed to help the assessor evaluate how, and to what extent, <br />a scenic resource is being degraded by a proposed action. Once a standardized <br />process is in place, visual impact assessment methods should be deployed to <br />document project induced impacts. The visual impact assessment techniques most <br />commonly used to document scenic resource impacts include: <br />1. Line-of-sight analysis. A graphic line between two points on a surface that <br />shows where along the line the view is being obstructed. This analysis can be <br />performed using ARC GIS. <br /> <br />2. Story poles. The temporary placement of a mock structure or poles at the height <br />and massing of a structure to simulate the impact of the structure on scenic <br />resources. <br /> <br />3. Computer simulation. The use of computers to simulate pre- and post-project <br />conditions by creating a computerized model of the height, scale and <br />architectural character of a structure together with the existing natural and built <br />environment surrounding it. <br /> <br />4. Photomontage. Creating a composite photograph by incorporating elements <br />from two or more photographs into a new image. Image editing software is often <br />used and the process is <br /> <br />These techniques are elaborated upon through their application in the following visual <br />impact assessment case studies: <br /> <br />Canyon Oaks Story Poles <br /> <br />The City of Calabasas, California, requires projects to conduct a story pole analysis if <br />they are located within its Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, or if they are requesting <br />height variances. The purpose of installing story poles is to assess the visual impact of <br />the project (See: Appendix D, Canyon Oaks Story Poles). <br /> <br />Scenic Resource Protection Programs and Strategies Page | 22 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.