My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-12-11 PL-CRC-2024-000019 Testimony - S. McMichael
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Cultural Resources Commission
>
Materials
>
2024
>
2024-12-11
>
Lāʻīpala Makai Planned Unit Development (PL-CRC-2024-000019)
>
2024-12-11 PL-CRC-2024-000019 Testimony - S. McMichael
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/11/2024 8:44:14 AM
Creation date
12/11/2024 8:40:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Cultural Resources Commission hearing THIS WEDNESDAY 6/8/22 at 10 am. <br /> This is related to the Naniloa proposed subdivision makai of the LPH Kapukapu proposal adjacent to us. <br /> It was deferred to the Cultural Commission by the Leeward Planning Commission on 4/21/21.Attached <br /> are the transcripts from the Commission meeting as well as the transcript of the testifiers. (Note these <br /> are from the in person (zoom) testimony, as I cannot find the written testimony on the County website <br /> https://records.hawaiicounty.gov/weblink/Browse.aspx?startid=9110&dbid=1). <br /> There were a number of issues raised with this project, including the County's lack of a tsunami zone <br /> evacuation plan, traffic issues, water runoff issues, sewer issues, native species impact, the fact that <br /> this application goes back to 2009 and expired in 2019, access to this parcel through a neighborhood, <br /> history of the developer, among others. All of these and more remain valid. <br /> The referral to the Cultural Resources Commission is based on the importance of having the archeologist <br /> present and to address concerns regarding Special Management Area Permit application. LPC <br /> Chairperson Vitousek stated (see Exhibit D, page 23): <br /> Cultural Resources Commission could be an appropriate location to have that type of discussion on whether descendant <br /> access issues are fully resolved in the burial treatment plan, whether additional descendant access and open space <br /> requirements should be proposed that would mitigate the impact of this project on the cultural landscape. Some of the <br /> things that were mentioned by the testifiers was the impact on the overall cultural landscape, and SHPD may <br /> have site-by-site mitigations for each specific site that was identified in the archaeological inventory, but they <br /> may not have considered the effect of the overall project on the landscape..." (emphasis added) <br /> • The access off Ali'i Drive to this subdivision (which the developer owns), currently zoned Ag-5a, will destroy a <br /> large section of the Great Wall of Kuakini, which is currently intact. <br /> • The cultural and archeological sites on this parcel, which are significant beyond two burials, are part of a much <br /> larger system, and are immediately adjacent to the Kahalu'u Historical District. (see attached) <br /> • This project is one of several being proposed piecemeal. Two additional parcels are currently being proposed for <br /> rezoning and development mauka within this ahupua'a alone <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.