My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-12-16 Janet Matlock
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2024
>
2024-12-19 Leeward
>
Item #1 Kona Hawaii Development, LLC (PL-SMA-2023-000038)
>
Individual Testimonies 12-12-24 to 12-17-24
>
2024-12-16 Janet Matlock
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2024 1:01:38 PM
Creation date
12/16/2024 1:01:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
12/16/2024
Description
Email testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
provide lodging to visitors—not residents—who have no experience of Kailua Kona's ongoing droughts and <br /> water restrictions.The Florida engineer hired to provide usage estimates seems to have forgotten/ignored <br /> that this project is being touted as a longer-term stay resort,yet the kitchenette water use is estimated at 5 <br /> minutes per day. Plus factor in an on-site laundry. Plus a restaurant. Plus a pool. Plus... <br /> Traffic <br /> PD Background Report: "Traffic:No traffic impactanalysis was conducted for the proposed project,however, <br /> the applicant stated that the proposed development does notgenerally conflict with the normal <br /> working/commuting traffic."(emphases added) <br /> PD Background Report:"Further, while a number of visitors will be driving to the proposed hotel, the visitor's <br /> normal travel pattern does notgenerally conflict with the normal working and/or commuting traffic" <br /> What evidence is there for these statements?What is a"visitor travel pattern?"What is"the normal <br /> working/commuting traffic?" <br /> We do not know,as there has not been a traffic study. <br /> PD Background Report: `As noted in the application, the request is fora SMA Permit and not a zone change. <br /> As such,the zoning code's concurrency requirement for a traffic impact analysis report is not required. <br /> Further relative to the SMA permit,based on the Topliss v. Hawaii County Planning Commission decision of <br /> the State Intermediate Court of Appeals,the Court opined that traffic is relevant only if the request is shown <br /> to have a substantial adverse effect on the coastal environment,and as such,should not be used as a basis <br /> to deny the SMA permit. In this case, the project is not adjacent to the shoreline and does not compromise <br /> coastal use.As a matter of fact,it should enhance coastal use by making pedestrian improvements along <br /> Kahakai Road." <br /> What is this?A sort of, "We don't want to do a traffic study,and you can't make us?" <br /> Are they expecting us to believe that adding parking for 147 vehicles(with a grand total of three public parking <br /> spots),and potentially sidewalks IF the Dept.of Public Works approves the design,will"enhance coastal <br /> use?"That adding the traffic generated by an additional 100+hotel rooms won't have a negative impact on <br /> AU'i Drive or adjacent streets?That having traffic exit from Kahakai Road will not create bottlenecks or safety <br /> issues? <br /> Evacuation <br /> PD Background Report: "However,in the event of locally generated tsunami-as it happened in the Tohoku <br /> region of northern Japan in 2011 -there would understandably be little evacuation time. Evacuation time <br /> would be limited,and regrettably,it would be something that cannot be avoided."(emphasis added) <br /> "Whether this project consists of 10,48,or 100(which is consistent with the zoning)rooms/units,having an <br /> areawide emergency evacuation plan,complete with designated and alternative routes for residents,guests, <br /> and stakeholders, would be appropriate. While such a plan could not be found on the website of the County <br /> Civil Defense Agency,if appropriate and desired,the applicant would be willing to work the[sic]County <br /> Office of Civil Defense on this." <br /> Yes.An areawide emergency evacuation plan would be appropriate.County Civil Defense should work with <br /> all interested and affected parties to develop a clear and comprehensive plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.