Laserfiche WebLink
provide lodging to visitors—not residents—who have no experience of Kailua Kona's ongoing droughts and <br /> water restrictions.The Florida engineer hired to provide usage estimates seems to have forgotten/ignored <br /> that this project is being touted as a longer-term stay resort,yet the kitchenette water use is estimated at 5 <br /> minutes per day. Plus factor in an on-site laundry. Plus a restaurant. Plus a pool. Plus... <br /> Traffic <br /> PD Background Report: "Traffic:No traffic impactanalysis was conducted for the proposed project,however, <br /> the applicant stated that the proposed development does notgenerally conflict with the normal <br /> working/commuting traffic."(emphases added) <br /> PD Background Report:"Further, while a number of visitors will be driving to the proposed hotel, the visitor's <br /> normal travel pattern does notgenerally conflict with the normal working and/or commuting traffic" <br /> What evidence is there for these statements?What is a"visitor travel pattern?"What is"the normal <br /> working/commuting traffic?" <br /> We do not know,as there has not been a traffic study. <br /> PD Background Report: `As noted in the application, the request is fora SMA Permit and not a zone change. <br /> As such,the zoning code's concurrency requirement for a traffic impact analysis report is not required. <br /> Further relative to the SMA permit,based on the Topliss v. Hawaii County Planning Commission decision of <br /> the State Intermediate Court of Appeals,the Court opined that traffic is relevant only if the request is shown <br /> to have a substantial adverse effect on the coastal environment,and as such,should not be used as a basis <br /> to deny the SMA permit. In this case, the project is not adjacent to the shoreline and does not compromise <br /> coastal use.As a matter of fact,it should enhance coastal use by making pedestrian improvements along <br /> Kahakai Road." <br /> What is this?A sort of, "We don't want to do a traffic study,and you can't make us?" <br /> Are they expecting us to believe that adding parking for 147 vehicles(with a grand total of three public parking <br /> spots),and potentially sidewalks IF the Dept.of Public Works approves the design,will"enhance coastal <br /> use?"That adding the traffic generated by an additional 100+hotel rooms won't have a negative impact on <br /> AU'i Drive or adjacent streets?That having traffic exit from Kahakai Road will not create bottlenecks or safety <br /> issues? <br /> Evacuation <br /> PD Background Report: "However,in the event of locally generated tsunami-as it happened in the Tohoku <br /> region of northern Japan in 2011 -there would understandably be little evacuation time. Evacuation time <br /> would be limited,and regrettably,it would be something that cannot be avoided."(emphasis added) <br /> "Whether this project consists of 10,48,or 100(which is consistent with the zoning)rooms/units,having an <br /> areawide emergency evacuation plan,complete with designated and alternative routes for residents,guests, <br /> and stakeholders, would be appropriate. While such a plan could not be found on the website of the County <br /> Civil Defense Agency,if appropriate and desired,the applicant would be willing to work the[sic]County <br /> Office of Civil Defense on this." <br /> Yes.An areawide emergency evacuation plan would be appropriate.County Civil Defense should work with <br /> all interested and affected parties to develop a clear and comprehensive plan. <br />