Laserfiche WebLink
Communications Commission. These RF safety standards shall <br /> apply to the aggregate emissions of co-located and nearby facilities <br /> not just the emissions of a single antenna; <br /> • Liability insurance without a pollution exclusion, pollution being <br /> defined as any solid, liquid, gaseous or thermal pollutant, <br /> irritant or contaminant including but not limited to artificially <br /> produced electric fields, magnetic fields, electromagnetic <br /> fields and all artificially produced ionizing and non-ionizing <br /> radiation; <br /> • The following unique clause was also inserted: no new small <br /> wireless facilities, as defined in 47 CFR 11.6002 (1), shall be <br /> approved unless the applicant can establish that failure to <br /> approve such an application would violate federal or state <br /> law. This clause was inserted to allow the City of White Plains to <br /> deny an application if federal law continues to uphold the <br /> `significant gap' provision. At the same time, it allows the Clty to <br /> approve an antenna if the law changes; <br /> • Link to White Plains New York Ordinance PDF <br /> Ithaca New York Ordinance <br /> • A 1500 foot setback between antennas (old code: 0 feet) <br /> • A 300 foot setback between antennas and homes (old code: 0 <br /> feet) <br /> • Requiring proof of a significant gap in service coverage for <br /> any antenna, proven by `in-kind' testing (such as drive-by tests <br /> and dropped calls) <br /> • Clarifying that an applicant's claim that it needs the proposed <br /> tower for "future capacity" is not sufficient to establish that it <br /> suffers from a significant gap in coverage <br /> • Requiring the least intrusive methods to fill any coverage gap <br /> for antennas <br /> • Requiring that a visual impact analysis be submitted for any <br /> new proposed antennas <br /> • Requiring General Liability Insurance without a pollution <br /> exclusion <br />