2024-12-16 Dana G Moss - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

According to the Court's decision, the FCC failed to provide evidence to support its decision in regard to the non-cancer health effects and that it also failed to respond to the extensive evidence that was filed with the FCC (via the docket which is also called "record") that shows that the current radiofrequency emissions guidelines may cause negative health effects unrelated to cancer. The court stated that, the FCC's failure, undermines the Commission's conclusions regarding the adequacy of its testing procedures, particularly as they relate to children, and its conclusions regarding the implications of long-term exposure to RF radiation, exposure to RF pulsation or modulation, and the effects of wireless technologies that were developed since 1996. The court also found that the FCC 2019 decision was arbitrary and capricious in its failure to respond to comments concerning environmental harm caused by RF radiation. The court's decision continued to say: "...the FCC completely failed to acknowledge, let alone respond to, comments concerning the impact of RF radiation on the environment...The record contains substantive evidence of potential environmental harms." Government Failed to Consider Evidence of Harm, Including to Children, From 5G and Wireless Radiation, Court Rules In a recent landmark ruling in a case brought by Children's Health Defense against the Federal Communications Commission, the court ruled the commission's 1996 health guidelines related to non-cancer harms from 5G and wireless-based technologies were capricious, arbitrary and not evidence-based. by Dafna Tachover, Esa August 18, 2021