My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-07-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2024
>
2024-07-15 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/23/2024 3:31:48 PM
Creation date
12/23/2024 3:22:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
57
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board <br />July 15, 2024 <br />If the Board decides it's a classification issue, then that's another avenue which requires <br />dismissal because Mr. Turner didn't file an internal complaint. <br />So, there's two hurdles that Mr. Turner has to jump through. The 20 -day action requirement to <br />file an appeal—not notice. And then, that this is actually a recruitment issue and not a <br />classification issue. <br />And I would also point out to the Board that there being, I guess, a question of jurisdiction, it's <br />the County's position that this should be referred to the Hawaii Labor Relation Board for a <br />determination of jurisdiction. <br />MS. BOND: Can I ask a question? <br />CHR. CABANAS: Go ahead. <br />MS. BOND: What's the drop dead date on this—on his that you say he's supposed to file the <br />appeal from? <br />MR. LEE: Twenty days from the action. <br />MS. BOND: And 20 -days from the action then so, we're going back and forth about what the <br />date of action is, correct? <br />MR. LEE: No, I would say the issue is—we're talking about notice because the Appellant isn't <br />necessarily contesting the date of the action. They're contesting the date of notice, which is the <br />County's position that is not the rule. <br />CHR. CABANAS: So, you're saying date of action, is date of decision? <br />MR. LEE: Correct. <br />CHR. CABANAS: But he wasn't given a notice. <br />MR. LEE: That's correct. And look, I guess I should address the moral issue here. Mr. Turner <br />did get short -end of the stick here and I think the 20 -days from action rule is stringent—perhaps, <br />too strict. But it's not—the rule is not notice—it's action. <br />And the County takes the position that there was enough going on where Mr. Turner knew that <br />something was happening. In his declaration, I'll refer to when he states that he was informed <br />that his department director was attempting to intercede on his behalf. Presumably, there's no <br />date attached to that statement. Presumably, that was before April 15'h before he got his <br />paycheck. <br />Page 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.