Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board <br />CHR. CABANAS: Please proceed. <br />July 15, 2024 <br />MR. KUNZ: Yeah. If I'm—and, Sommer, you can maybe clarify this. If I'm reading the graph <br />correctly, though, it's stating the number of inquiries and complaints—and then, right next to <br />that, the number say, "time resolved in days"—and it demonstrates out of the 1816 were—was <br />resolved? <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: Yes, so from that chart it looks 16 would have been resolved in less than 14 <br />days. <br />MR. KUNZ: Fourteen days—(inaudible). <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: And then, there's still two pending which is probably they're probably <br />trying to get clarifying information. <br />MR. KUNZ: Would that not address what your question was, Gabe? <br />MS. CABANAS: In part because I think we also should know that—okay, was reasonable <br />accommodation provided in—what is it -16 cases? Well—yeah, 16. But then, here it says, <br />"12"12 internal and external. <br />MS. TOKIHIRO: That's why it's a combinationso, there were 18 total and (inaudible) 12 <br />(inaudible). <br />MS. CABANAS: Right. So, what happened? It was resolved but then, how was it resolved? <br />Were reasonable accommodations provided? Were there modifications maybe to the work <br />environment? Modifications to the job—some minor job duties? Just to, kind of bring to kind <br />of paint that whole picture. Yeah? Okay. Is that okay, Mr. Kunz? <br />MR.KUNZ: Yes, itis. I was just <br />MS. CABANAS: `Cause it's not only the time element— <br />MR. <br />lement <br />MR. KUNZ: Correct. But <br />MS. CABANAS: —it's the matter at -hand. Yes, you want to be timely. You don't want it <br />going on for months, but was the matter resolved? Were reasonable accommodations provided? <br />MR. KUNZ: So, I was just curious as to what depth of detail that you wanted— <br />CHR. CABANAS: Yeah. <br />MR. KUNZ: `cause you said you didn't want details, so <br />Page 7 <br />