2024-08-27 Salary Commission Minutes

Home

Salary Commission August 27, 2024 MS. FRENZ: So, now, once the motion to reconsider passes under Robert's Rules of Order, the original motion is taken back up again. So, it's now being reconsidered. So, it would just be reconsidering whether or not you want to set the salary at 125,000 for the first year and re-evaluate in 2025. CHR. PAVAO: They could amend that existing motion? MS. FRENZ: That motion would, theoretically, possibly fail now, if this Board is in agreement to reconsider and there's enough votes, we need all votes today for that motion to now fail. MS. NAMAHOE: So, in other words, to make it fail this is Namahoewe need to say, "No" we're not seconding that motion. CHR. PAVAO: Should we take another vote? Did you make a motion? MR. NELSON: So, I make a motion—so we're making a motion to rescind the MS. FRENZ: No. So, it would just be a motionso, right now, we would be taking up the original motion from July. And that motion was, to the best of my recollection, to set the OSCER salary at 125,000 for a one-year period and re-evaluate one year from the setting of that salary at $125,000.00. CHR. PAVAO: So, we should just go ahead and vote on that motion and see if it passes— MS. FRENZ: We need someone to make that motion, have a second, discussion, and then a vote. But we don't have that motion back on the table, yet. MS. KAWA`AUHAU: Commissioner Kawa`auhau. I'll bring that motion back to the table. CHR. PAVAO: Is there a second? MR. RIORDAN: Commissioner Riordan. I second it. CHR. PAVAO: Okay. Any further discussion? If not, we'll go ahead and vote on that motion—on the original motion. MR. RIORDAN: Could you clarify what we're voting on? CHR. PAVAO: Basically, what we're doing is either voting to sustain the original motion or voting "no" to the original motion. If the original motion dies then we would have a new motion with a different salary schedule suggested. Page 8