My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-01-07 Mike Reimer, Ph.D.
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-02-06 - Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
WPC Additional Testimonies 12/5/24 through 2/06/25 (2/6 WPC Mtg) (124)
>
2025-01-07 Mike Reimer, Ph.D.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2025 2:09:27 PM
Creation date
1/7/2025 2:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
1/7/2025
Description
GP testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TESTIMONY: Hawaii County General Plan 2045: Leeward Planning Commission <br /> January 16-17, 2025 p. 5 <br /> The Army states "While not an enforceable regulatory standard, this represents a <br /> concentration in drinking water that is not expected to produce adverse health effects if <br /> the water is consumed over an entire lifetime." (https-//aec.army.mil/PFAS/HI/PTA,. No <br /> reference to support that claim is given in that notice. <br /> However, this is now in conflict with recent U.S. EPA levels. In April of 2024, the U.S. <br /> EPA set levels for drinking water, depending on the type of forever chemical, at 4-10 <br /> parts per trillion. (ittps://www.epa.gov/sdwa/and-polyfluoroalkyl-substances-pfas). <br /> "EPA expects that over many years the final rule will prevent PFAS exposure in drinking <br /> water for approximately 100 million people, prevent thousands of deaths, and reduce <br /> tens of thousands of serious PFAS-attributable illnesses." Ibid.) This statement from <br /> EPA about PFAS contamination foretells a tremendous health benefit with the <br /> elimination of this toxin in the environment. <br /> Why would fracking be done at PTA? Perhaps for several reasons, not only to increase <br /> water flow from the perched water reservoir but to include underground waste disposal <br /> and energy production. It was noted that when this perched water was found at PTA, <br /> lower levels of that groundwater were found to be at higher temperatures, up to 250 <br /> degrees Fahrenheit. It was suggested at the time of that finding, the warmer water <br /> could be used as a source of steam to run electricity-generating turbines. <br /> (https-//eos.org/articles/underground-water-reserves-found-hawaiis-high-country). <br /> The contamination risk could be exacerbated with fracking operations, opening flow <br /> paths from a larger volume for water migration. Another potential source of <br /> contamination is injecting waste underground. In 2005, when the EPA began enforcing <br /> elimination of cesspools containing human excreta, it provided the U.S. Army at PTA <br /> with minimum regulations to prevent the contamination of groundwater that could be <br /> used for drinking purposes by underground injections of that waste. Fracking is a <br /> means to increase underground storage reservoirs for fluids and gases. The U.S. Army <br /> operated six large capacity cesspools at that time. <br /> (https-//www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-09/docuiiients/calo-pohakuloa05.pdf). <br /> A study conducted by the University of Hawaii showed how injecting wastewater into a <br /> saline underlying reservoir would contaminate a freshwater reservoir above it (Duane L. <br /> Heutmaker, Frank L. Peterson, and Stephen W. Wheatcraft, March 1977, Technical <br /> Report No. 107, A laboratory study of waste injection into a Ghyben-Herzberg <br /> groundwater system under dynamic conditions). Fracking would increase the pollution <br /> potential. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.