My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-21 Testimony Wildfire Safety Advocates
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-01-16 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-11-22 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting - Biocultural/Climate Change
>
LPC Testimony 11/21-11/22 (11/22 LPC Meeting)
>
2024-11-21 Testimony Wildfire Safety Advocates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2024 11:16:57 AM
Creation date
1/7/2025 2:40:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/21/2021
Description
Written testimony given at LPC 11-22-24 hearing from Wildfire Safety Advocates
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WILDFIRE SAFETY General Plan 2045 Comments <br /> 46 A WDF.IKO LUA HAVOCA Y✓AT I ES Leeward Planning Commission Nov 21,2024 <br /> '. <br /> CONTACT:wildfireWaikoloa4gmail.com <br /> Criteria for Prioritizing Access Road Projects. <br /> At best, only one of the three projects in the Waikoloa area that satisfy the policies in <br /> 32h and 32k have the potential to be completed in this decade. We ask that you identify <br /> the extension of Kamakoa Drive to Queen Ka'ahumanu Highway as the first priority for <br /> three reasons: <br /> 1) Kamakoa Drive directly serves the parcels in the north end of the Village where <br /> almost all the new development is planned (including the library), <br /> 2) the costs born by the public will be lowest of the three projects because of <br /> commitments by the landowners, and <br /> 3) it will soon be half built because landowners with a vested interest in the on-going <br /> developments have submitted permit applications to excavate the right-of-way for a <br /> temporary emergency evacuation road that can be upgraded to meet the standards for <br /> a dedicated county arterial road. <br /> Clearly no second arterial road will be completed and open to traffic before the <br /> residential new development is built without public funds. The costs of these projects <br /> are significant within the context of both the County CIP budget and the State CIP. The <br /> odds of getting two funded during the next 5 years are virtually zero, and the odds of <br /> getting the Paniolo extension funded are close to zero without a major infusion of <br /> federal $. The Kamakoa Drive extension is the only option that has a reasonable <br /> chance of being affordable with available public resources this decade. <br /> The economic feasibility of projects should be a critical factor in prioritizing projects. The <br /> public cost of extending Kamakoa Dr to Q-K is far less than extending Paniolo to <br /> Kawaihae Road. The difference between the two could be as much as $100 million. The <br /> land for the Kamakoa extension is being donated by the land owners, they are <br /> constructing the initial alignment for the r-o-w, performing the environmental and cultural <br /> resource reviews, and there are no stream crossings that require bridges. The Paniolo <br /> extension to Kawaihae Road route is more than three times longer, has no commitment <br /> from landowners to donate the land, no work is being performed by private sources to <br /> lay out, excavate and build a r-o-w, and the route crosses four major gulches requiring <br /> expensive bridges. The huge additional cost of the Paniolo route ensures that NO <br /> resources will be available to complete it within this decade. Completing the Kamakoa <br /> route is at least financially feasible before the Village adds 50% more residents and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.