Laserfiche WebLink
outlets stating; "There is no climate danger". He explain the reason for this narrative is the <br /> investors_ in renewable energy, want to make these changes. <br /> • Hilo does not have a Community Development Plan. How can a Big Island General Plan <br /> move forward without that? Hilo is 22% of the island. <br /> • 1.13 under "Increase the biodiversity and resilience of native habitats" reads, "Incentivize <br /> private land management practices that protect and enhance natural resource values and, <br /> when appropriate,pursue the acquisition of lands for the protection of natural resources." <br /> 'Incentives" mean more taxes. "Protection" means more rules. Who's "values" is this plan <br /> referring too because it's not the locals? "Pursue the acquisition of lands" does this say they <br /> are going to pursing taking people's private property? Again with "protection of natural <br /> resources". This plan should be focused on people growing more food and it is doing the <br /> exact opposite! <br /> • This plan wants to turn land into "conservation". The exact opposite is what is needed for <br /> Big Island! We need to turn land into Ag Villages and grow more food! Steve Shropshire, a <br /> resident of Papaikou,has created an Ag Villages plan. <br /> Ag Village to add to the General Plan: <br /> Papaikou Ag Village Objectives: <br /> https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/_files/ugd/86fc0c_2cblcc6d604f4cdd971ad4083lc745bc.pdf <br /> Papaikou Site Plan: <br /> https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/_files/ugd/86fc0c_5e4cdb02efeb46a5ae949a3579aff00d.pdf <br /> Papaikou Development: <br /> https://www.standtogetherhawaii.com/_files/ugd/86fc0c_c2af52c8b3c645bla6868a724eee8304.pdf <br /> A Hawaiian born Kanaka revised the Collaborative Biocultural Stewardship that is in the plan. <br /> You can see it in the pdf below: <br />