Laserfiche WebLink
I for one DO NOT want: More regulation, more taxation, more controls of use of land, more <br /> conservation land (1.4 million is quite enough!), more top-down governance, certainly not more <br /> 'stake-holders' to have say over land use, absolutely not one driven by a deceptive and false <br /> climate change narrative or that sets the stage for a surveillance society! <br /> I DO WANT: More freedom, more innovation (people solve problems, not bureaucracies) lower <br /> taxes, more accountability and transparency, more righteousness, more justice, more privacy and <br /> honoring of the laws of the land and of our creator, more truth and more consequence to those <br /> who violate truth and light. <br /> I honor you and thank you for showing that the people are heard by decisive action that honors us <br /> and honors our Creator. <br /> Willing to talk with directors, commissioners, planners about my thoughts. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Kevin Hill <br /> PS. There are numerous people who could help with the motions to amend. I heard the motion to <br /> discuss the stake-holder definition and e-mailed the following comment. <br /> Aloha. I'm listening to the deliberation on the motion on the table. the defining of stake holder. The issue <br /> is not about just trying to include everybody. The problem is that it is MORE inclusive. <br /> Stakeholders includes INVESTORS. There is a move through out the country to quantify items such as <br /> water, wildlife, pollination etc <br /> These investors... now stakeholders will have a claim on and a voice on use of lands. <br /> It's been the homeowner or business and the county... not investors who are now empowered to control <br /> land through this redefining of assets. <br /> Great information on this movement throughout the country and details of how it was shut down for the <br /> moment at the federal level in January of 2023 can be found by searching "the great taking" by David <br /> Rogers. <br /> Here's one link to a 15-20 minute summary of the documentary. (https://www.youtube.com/watch? <br /> v=E XM1Y0uvea) <br /> Any motion around this topic MUST be appraised of this movement to understand the numerous <br /> objections to the definition of Stakeholders on the GP. It's not to include more people or entities but to <br /> restrict them! <br /> This is why the well-informed public needs to be a part of the discussion following the testimony. Many <br /> testifies know what I've shared here and could give clarity for meaningful change to the gp. There is so <br /> much going on under the water line that we need each other to plot a pono course for the future. <br />