Laserfiche WebLink
15. The Special Permit background report includes a letter between myself and the former <br /> Head of the Highways Branch of the DOT. The Planning Dept. was CC'd in this letter <br /> and for some reason decided that it should be included as testimony. That was not my <br /> intention. Meanwhile other correspondence to the Planning Dept. concerning this <br /> application was not included as testimony. So I really don't understand how the Planning <br /> Dept. decides what is testimony and what is not. To avoid this confusion in the future, I <br /> recommend that all testimony where for or against be only directed to the Planning <br /> Commission mail inboxes with the appropriate subject headings indicating that it is <br /> testimony. Thus no public testimony should appear in the application nor in the <br /> background report. <br />