Laserfiche WebLink
warming. The Government’s expert had to accept that this was not the case. <br />5. The film claims that a study showed that polar bears had drowned due to disappearing arctic <br />ice. It turned out that Mr. Gore had misread the study: in fact, four polar bears drowned, and this <br />was because of a particularly violent storm. <br />6. The film threatens that global warming could stop the Gulf Stream, throwing Europe into an <br />ice age. The Claimant’s evidence was that this was a scientific impossibility. <br />7. The film blames global warming for species losses, including coral reef bleaching. The <br />Government could not find any evidence to support this claim. <br />8. The film suggests that sea levels could rise by 7 meters, causing the displacement of millions <br />of people. In fact, the evidence is that sea levels are expected to rise by about 40 centimeters <br />over the next 100 years and there is no such threat of massive migration. <br />9. The film claims that rising sea levels has caused the evacuation of certain Pacific islands to <br />New Zealand. The Government was unable to substantiate this, and the Court observed that <br />this appears to be a false claim. <br />Also, the Court's interim ruling included the following: <br />High Court Judge Michael Burton stated: <br />1. The film suggests that the Greenland ice covering could melt, causing sea levels to rise <br />dangerously. The evidence is that Greenland will not melt for a millennia. <br />2. The film suggests that the Antarctic ice covering is melting; the evidence was that it is, in fact, <br />increasing. <br />“Former Vice President Al Gore, the documentary’s moderator, makes nine <br />statements in the film that are not supported by the current mainstream scientific <br />consensus. For instance, Gore’s script implies that Greenland or West Antarctica <br />might melt soon, creating a sea-level rise of up to 20 feet that would cause <br />devastation from San Francisco to the Netherlands to Bangladesh139.” <br />The judge called this “distinctly alarmist” and said the consensus view is that if <br />Greenland melted, it would release this amount of water “but only after, and over, a millennia.” <br />The climate change narrative will destroy people’s freedom and add more regulations, fines and <br /> <br />