Laserfiche WebLink
Hawaii County Scenic Resources Inventory and Mapping Project <br /> generated from proposed activities, establishes when a visual <br /> assessment may be necessary, explains the components of a <br /> visual assessment when required, and describes avoidance, <br /> mitigation, and offset measures that may eliminate or reduce <br /> unreasonable adverse impacts to existing scenic and aesthetic <br /> uses. <br /> Implementation <br /> Chapter 35 applies to "the alteration of a coastal wetland, great pond, freshwater <br /> wetland, fragile mountain area, river, stream, or brook, as defined in the M.S.R.A § 480- <br /> 8 of the Natural Resources Protection Act, that requires an individual permit or is <br /> eligible for Tier 3 review." <br /> The Chapter requires that the Department determine the following when an activity is <br /> proposed: <br /> • Presence of a scenic resource listed in Section 10 of the NRPA; <br /> • Significance of the scenic resource; <br /> • Character of the surrounding environment; <br /> • Expectations of the current viewer; <br /> • Extent and intransience of the activity; <br /> • Project purpose; and <br /> • Context of the proposed activity. <br /> The Department is instructed that "unreasonable adverse visual impacts are those that <br /> are expected to unreasonably interfere with the general public's visual enjoyment and <br /> appreciation of a scenic resource, or those that otherwise unreasonably impair the <br /> character or quality of such a place." <br /> The Department's visual impact assessment is based on the following: <br /> • Landscape compatibility. The project's impact on the color, form, line <br /> and texture of the environment by whether it differs significantly from its <br /> existing surroundings; <br /> • Scale contrast. The project's size and scope given its location within the <br /> viewshed of a scenic resource; and <br /> Scenic Resource Protection Programs and Strategies Page 119 <br />