My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-01-15 Sherilyn Wells
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-01-16 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
LPC Testimonies 12/19/24 through 1/16/25 (1/16 LPC Mtg) (65)
>
2025-01-15 Sherilyn Wells
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/7/2025 3:36:15 PM
Creation date
2/7/2025 3:49:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
1/16/2025
Description
GP testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7 <br /> sensitivity to increasing CO2 is on the low end and natural variability is dominant, <br /> then decreasing CO2 emissions won't have much of a noticeable effect. <br /> Further,we are unable to predict SOLAR VARIATIONS,volcanic eruptions, and <br /> multidecadal oscillations, so there's a great deal of uncertainty in the model. <br /> There's a key difference between a scientific consensus and a consensus of scientists: <br /> Scientific consensus reflects our longstanding knowledge base about a topic about <br /> which there is, essentially, no scientific disagreement(e.g., earth orbits the sun). <br /> On the other hand, a consensus of scientists represents a deliberate expression of <br /> collective judgment by a group of scientists on a poorly understood topic. This is <br /> often at the official request of a government or organization, ergo will have political <br /> overtones and pressures. See Dr.Judith Curry testimony to Congressional <br /> subcommittee (link on page 1). <br /> NEW ENERGY SOURCES <br /> The Plan fails to account for emergence of energy systems that have nothing to do <br /> with fossil fuels, that will moot the basis for the assertion of anthropogenic climate <br /> change. <br /> Working models of patents (such as anti-gravity vehicles) already exist, according to <br /> U.S. Navy, in confirming Patent Office inquiries re whether to approve the patents <br /> submitted by Salvatore Cezar Pais, a Romanian-American scientist. <br /> In addition to the U.S. Navy/Salvatore Pais patents, there are thousands of suppressed <br /> patents,including clean (free, anti-gravity,zero point, etc.) energy production and <br /> propulsion systems and medical technology, many of which President Trump is <br /> committed to releasing, as first indicated in his 2017 inaugural address9. <br /> Although administrative agencies resisted his executive order and slowed the release of <br /> such patents to a mere trickle during his first term, there is every reason to believe THIS <br /> time the administrative response will be much livelier, far more in the public interest. <br /> President Trump had better luck in his first term with the category of"mysteries of <br /> space," as referenced in that address, when he oversaw the creation of Space Force. <br /> See quote in footnote and the following screenshot. <br /> 9"We stand at the birth of a new millennium,ready to unlock the mysteries of space,to free the earth <br /> from the miseries of disease,and to harness the energies,industries,and technologies of tomorrow." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.