My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-21 Written Testimony Pacific Rim Land Inc.
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-02-24 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-11-21 Leeward Special General Plan Meeting - Introduction & Overview
>
LPC Testimony 10/1- 11/21
>
2024-11-21 Written Testimony Pacific Rim Land Inc.
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2024 11:36:33 AM
Creation date
2/21/2025 11:10:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/19/2024
Description
Written testimony given at LPC 11-21-24 hearing from Pacific Rim Land Inc.
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
{ <br /> Mr. Michael Yee,Director <br /> April 8, 2019 <br /> Page 3 <br /> consideration for a "a mix of high density, medium density, low density, industrial, <br /> industrial-commercial and/or open designations in areas where new settlements may <br /> be desirable, but where the specific settlement pattern and mix of uses have not been <br /> determined. " Thus,conceivably all uses,with the exception of resort, could be <br /> considered within an Urban Expansion area. <br /> As noted earlier,the subject site is already entitled for certain type of industrial uses <br /> until the year 2043,which is nearly twenty-five(25)years from now. Thus, these <br /> land use entitlements have,de facto,established a land use pattern for this area. <br /> Given that,future land uses adjacent or proximate to this area can be more <br /> appropriately planned. For example, it would be less likely that a residential <br /> subdivision would be planned adjacent to an area designated Industrial on the LUPAG <br /> map. <br /> c. Having the Industrial designation would make it more feasible for a portion or the <br /> entire site to secure a State Land Use Urban boundary amendment and subsequent <br /> County Industrial zoning. Such designations would then allow a plethora of <br /> industrial uses which could support the community- such as warehousing, self <br /> storage facility and the like-not covered by the specific use limitation of a Special <br /> Permit. This would obviate the need to seek new or amended Special Permits for <br /> uses not expressly covered by the Special Permits. <br /> d. Finally,the site does not have any developmental constraints and is reasonably <br /> serviced with supportive infrastructure. For example, based on studies conducted for <br /> the existing Special Permits,the site does not have any archaeological,topographical, <br /> or drainage issues. Likewise,it has adequate infrastructure,particularly access to <br /> potable water,and all other infrastructure requirements can be reasonably addressed. <br /> Again,we respectfully request your favorable consideration of the Applicant's request. <br /> Should you have any questions or wish further information on this matter, please feel free to <br /> contact me. Thank you very much! <br /> Sincerely, <br /> \.\0\ <br /> SIDNEY M. FUKE <br /> Planning Consultant <br /> Enclosures <br /> Copy—Goodfellow Brothers, LLC w/enclosure via email <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.