My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-12-18 Bret Dixon GP Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-02-24 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-12-19 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
LPC Testimony 11/22 - 12/19 Draft GP 2045 (50) (12/19 LPC Meeting)
>
2024-12-18 Bret Dixon GP Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2024 7:33:51 AM
Creation date
2/21/2025 11:11:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
12/18/2024
Description
GP Email testimony
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Pg. 84 Table 19: General Plan Land Use Designations and Maps <br /> No Changes <br /> Pg. 85 Agriculture and Natural Land Use <br /> No Changes <br /> Pg 86 4.1.4 Urban Growth Areas <br /> 2nd para: Red: "Smart Growth" change to something safer, know what it represents not hidden <br /> meanings. Black out: the word "sustainable" and from "More specifically, urban centers have <br /> been designed to create.... Driving." - The government or its agencies should not impede or <br /> alter the rights of citizens to travel it's call our right to travel, which is constitutional. <br /> Pg 87 Objective 13 Increase the use of Smart Growth principles to focus development <br /> within designated urban centers. <br /> Policies Red: change "Smart Growth" to Evaluate and analyze development within designated <br /> urban centers. <br /> Item 13.3 Red: "Incentivize" what is that& how does it benefit the public? <br /> 13.6 Red: "may include additional acreages to account for....." must revise section to make it <br /> clearer as to how this inclusion will work to the advantage or disadvantage of historic sites, <br /> public access, parks, & open spaces. More clarity is necessary because saying ok to unclear <br /> "PLANNING" should never be accepted. <br /> Item #13.12 - Red: Revise entire sentence "Urban renewal, rehabilitation...." need to include <br /> people or the public not just communities, businesses, & governmental agencies. Planning <br /> Boards should always include the people/public. This will give people the power to make <br /> decisions, not just testify for 3 minutes at a Planning Commission hearing. That needs to <br /> change. More people/public involvement needs to be promoted. This involvement may be the <br /> inspiration or motivation for people to become active in planning for themselves, their future <br /> generations. It is time for governments & businesses to take a back seat! <br /> Item 13.13 Red: Revise entire sentence. "Support master planning by ....." it's not"Support" it <br /> should be to Scrutinize, evaluate, analyze and recommend by experts and the people. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.