My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-01-27 Rebecca Melendez Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-02-24 Leeward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2025-02-20 Leeward Continuance of Speical General Plan Meeting
>
Individual Testimonies 2025-01-17 through 2025-02-18
>
2025-01-27 Rebecca Melendez Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2025 8:47:21 AM
Creation date
2/21/2025 11:11:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i. Establish a TOD overlay zone project district with a minimum size of 15 acres. <br /> ii. Create a TND overlay zone for existing zoned lands within identified residential and <br /> commercial zoning districts. <br /> iii. Allow for residential uses in ML and MCX zoning districts. <br /> iv. Support innovative uses of alternative energy, agriculture, aquaculture, and <br /> others, in MCX zoning district <br /> What exactly does "Establish a TOD overlay zone project district with a minimum size <br /> of 15 acres" mean? <br /> What does a "TND overlay zone" look like? <br /> What does ML and MCX stand for? These are not in their glossary, and I can't find <br /> them in the GP or online. <br /> This General Plan is NOT CLEAR AND NEEDS TO BE OPPOSED, IF NOT ONLY FOR THE <br /> REASON THAT IT IS NOT CLEAR. <br /> Page 98 <br /> 14.1 Support the State Land Use reclassification to Rural in alignment with the <br /> General Plan Rural designation. <br /> What is the General Plan Rural Designation? <br /> The General Plan changes High-End Land Use Titles, for example Hokulia Lands from <br /> "Agriculture" to "Rural". This will allow this High-End developer to by pass things <br /> such as the Environmental Impact Statement and this is NOT good for the land or the <br /> community. <br /> Please OPPOSE ALL HIGH-END DEVELOPERS LAND USE TITLE CHANGES THAT THE <br /> COUNTY WOULD LIKE TO CHANGE TO "RURAL" ALL WHILE CHANGING PRIVATE <br /> LANDS TO RECREATION THAT WILL NOT ALLOW THE PRIVATE LAND OWNER TO <br /> PASS THEIR LAND TO FAMILY OR SELL IT IN THE FUTURE. <br /> 14.2 Support reclassification/rezoning of appropriate General Plan Rural designated <br /> areas where an intermediate land use and a well-defined buffer between Urban and <br /> Productive Agricultural areas are consistent with the surrounding uses and rural <br /> character. <br /> What is the "reclassification/rezoning of appropriate General Plan Rural <br /> designated..."? <br /> They are changing Land Use Titles in the GP and that NEEDS TO BE OPPOSED! <br /> 4.4 Rural-style residential-agricultural developments, such as new small-scale rural <br /> communities or extensions of existing rural communities, should be incentivized to <br /> cluster in appropriate locations. <br /> t5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.