My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-02-16 Dea Rackley Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-03-10 - Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
Individual Testimonies 02-06-2025 through 03-10-2025 (57)
>
2025-02-16 Dea Rackley Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/17/2025 6:43:13 AM
Creation date
2/17/2025 6:43:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Dea Racklev <br /> To: WPCtestimonv;LPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Subject line:DO NOT Recommend the Hawaii GP 2045 <br /> Date: Sunday,February 16,2025 11:57:20 AM <br /> Subject line: DO NOT Recommend the Hawaii GP 2045! <br /> Email to model is below(optional): <br /> Aloha Commissioners, <br /> The Big island Plan cannot go through the way it is designed. It is hard to believe any local helped <br /> design this plan. <br /> Here are some concerns: <br /> There is a huge part of the plan dedicated to "Climate Change".However,why do most experts state <br /> there is NO climate danger? Climate Experts Speak Out Against Climate Danger Click Here! <br /> The word "Stakeholder," defined in the plan,is written 86 times and literally means anyone in the entire <br /> world can have input on this plan. <br /> Please recommend Stakeholder change to the following: "Local Communities". Local Communities are <br /> local Big Island farmers,homeowners,renters,organizations,businesses, and individuals who live on <br /> Big Island or have property on Big Island that will be personally affected by projects,decisions,or <br /> activities in the general plan. Effective local community engagement and management are crucial for <br /> the success and sustainability of any initiative,as it helps ensure that diverse perspectives and interests <br /> are considered. <br /> The OSCER Department in the plan will null and void all public input and leave decisions to unelected <br /> officials. This is NOT okay! This department should not be created. This is on page 188,40.8. <br /> The Planning Department has sent out letters too many homeowners telling them their land use will be <br /> changed from resident to recreation due to the General Plan 2045. This will drastically lower their <br /> property value and opens the door to rezone the area. This is not pono. It breaks the Aloha Spirit law § <br /> 5-7.5. To reduce someone's property value is not okay. This must be made pono again. <br /> There is a huge section on climate change and things that will be affected. This needs to be further <br /> researched. There are over 1900 credentialed scientist that say there is no climate danger.Here is the <br /> pdf showing the scientist and what country they are from.hUs:Hclintel.org/wp- <br /> contenj/=loads/2024/1 O/WCD-241023.pdf John Coleman,the first weather man for Good Morning <br /> America and the Founder of the Weather Channel has gone on CNN and other media outlets stating, <br /> "There is no climate danger".He explain the reason for this narrative is the investors,in renewable <br /> energy,want to make these changes. <br /> Hilo does not have a Community Development Plan.How can a Big Island General Plan move forward <br /> without that?Hilo is 22%of the island. <br /> 1.13 under"Increase the biodiversity and resilience of native habitats"reads, "Incentivize private land <br /> management practices that protect and enhance natural resource values and, when appropriate,pursue <br /> the acquisition of lands for the protection of natural resources." 'Incentives"mean more taxes. <br /> "Protection"means more rules. Who's "values" is this plan referring too because it's not the locals? <br /> "Pursue the acquisition of lands" does this say they are going to pursing taking people's private <br /> property?Again with "protection of natural resources". This plan should be focused on people growing <br /> more food and it is doing the exact opposite! <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.