Laserfiche WebLink
Merit Appeals Board <br />May 24, 2024 <br />And there's the (inaudible) judiciary has a binder about 4-inches thick on pro se —how to <br />handle pro se's. It's a real problem in court. Yeah. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Yeah. I (inaudible) certain things that are beyond our control. <br />MR. WISEMAN: Yeah. <br />CHR. CABANAS: And I think the informational sheet serves to help both sides because you <br />heard this morning, the County attorney had questions, and we're not going to go into the merits, <br />which the informational sheet will help both of them both parties. <br />MR. KUNZ: I think if —today was a really great example of how understanding procedures <br />not only the lay person but even counsel —and if there's a matter of semantic issues on this <br />sheet —one, would we not be able to act as guideposts during the process, which I think <br />Ms. Bond, kind of, clarified if we say, "Just tell your story." I think because I have a feeling it <br />would be difficult to get around some of the jargon without us dissecting this another time versus <br />if we understand that we create those guideposts, as needed, and there's five of us that are able <br />to, kind of —should be able to catch that. I'd feel comfortable with that versus if we're always <br />having to re-create the moment. <br />And I get, Gay, your point completely because it isI could read this and go, "What does that <br />mean?" So, I can imagine any layperson having the same difficulty, but I believe it would be our <br />responsibility to set that little groundwork as we go forward with each individual. `Cause I think <br />we already know, certain sections, they're going to get caught and it's really up to us to help <br />clarify it. I think that makes it more fair. Thank you. <br />MR. WISEMAN: Yeah. The (inaudible) state of any layperson coming into a governmental <br />hearing whether it's court, here, or otherwise —is intimidation —absent the constant litigator who <br />just loves to litigate. We had one in the —well, you weren't there, J—but the Ethics was iton <br />the Planning Ethics or something. I mean, there was an appellant there who just appeals <br />everything. She was really a constant litigant. In fact, there's one term called "vexatious" <br />litigator, which I declared one time and they appealed it —and the Circuit Court of Appeals <br />actually affirmed that —and what that means is the court would not accept any filings from that <br />person unless it's approved first. <br />But, again, going backso, someone coming in here —it is intimidation. But I think all of us <br />have that awareness and we try to comfort the people, so —and that's all it's going that's what <br />it's going to take. Yeah. <br />MS. BOND: So, it's almost like we should say or defer giving their opening statement —"my <br />mom made me say this" —kind of a thing. <br />So, I mean, if she really insists that we put it in there, then I guess we should put it in there. But, <br />once again, as soon as you start adding word salad into something that people don't understand, <br />then it defeats the purpose of this. <br />Page 26 <br />