My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Sugg. 25-04
PublicDocuments
>
Finance Department
>
Property Management Division
>
Public Access, Open Space, and Natural Resources Preservation Commission
>
Commission Meeting Information
>
Board Packets
>
2025 Meetings
>
02 - March 10, 2025
>
2025 Suggestions
>
Sugg. 25-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2025 7:32:14 AM
Creation date
3/5/2025 7:31:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the Lymans built their homes,they constructed stone walls to support the foundations and <br /> manage the ocean waters. These"hardened shore Lines"were allowed atthe time of <br /> construction, but are not currently permitted. The shoreline setback requirement had been <br /> 20 feet from the high-water line. At the time of purchase of the property by the current <br /> owner, the shoreline setback requirement was 40 feet,with an exception allowing for 20 <br /> feet when the 40-foot requirement resulted in more than 50%of the property not being <br /> available for construction. Even so,the allowed buildingenvelope was limited to 7,000 <br /> square feet. Recently,that requirement has been extended to 40 feet with no exceptions. <br /> The Special ManagementArea regulations require public hearings when the proposed <br /> construction is greater than$500,000 (SMA Major)or approval of the planning director <br /> when the proposed construction is less than$500,000 (SMA Minor). it was as an SMA <br /> Major project that the condominium project was proposed, and the owner withdrew the <br /> application when the community reaction was so adverse. <br /> Current Status. <br /> The property has been listed for sale with the current listing agent, Peggy Kent of Lava <br /> Luxury Realty since March 2023. It had previously been listed with Kevin McCabe of <br /> RE/MAX Brokers, for two years, during which time the property had been proposed for <br /> purchase by the County under the PONC program and approved by the county council, but <br /> turned down by Mayor Mitch Roth. The PONC acquisition process had gone far enough <br /> along that the property was appraised by the county in preparation for negotiation and <br /> purchase. Earlier,the property had been listed for sale but not aggressively marketed. <br /> The property remains unsold and actively marketed for sale. <br /> According to the previous county planning director,the property, given the current state <br /> and county legislative and regulatory requirements,would require compliance with the 40 <br /> foot setback and Special Management Area guidelines if new construction were <br /> undertaken, but the existing structures could be remodeled or rehabilitated without such <br /> restrictions. This would apply to use or construction by the county as well as by private <br /> buyers or developers. Buyers who have expressed interest in the property are afraid of the <br /> process and timingfor permitting approval for renovating and reconstruction.This is a <br /> result of the public outcry that occurred earlier on with the SMA M-ajor permit application <br /> that was submitted. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.