My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2025-03-05 Heidi White Testimony
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-03-10 - Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
Individual Testimonies 02-06-2025 through 03-10-2025 (57)
>
2025-03-05 Heidi White Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/6/2025 9:33:41 AM
Creation date
3/6/2025 9:33:36 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
would feel near wireless sources)at the end of the MRI." <br /> Nor do they have any research on health risks with cell towers that they areal I owing to be placed anywhere,and some of these cell <br /> tower tops are just a few feet from residential homes,HWY,and retirement homes...because a lot of the island is a mountain.If you put <br /> the base of a cell tower on one street,the top could be directly across from the community. <br /> https://mdsafetech.org/cell-tower-health-effects/: <br /> ***Percentage of studies that reported harmful effect of EMR in various groups in MOEF Report <br /> Human Effects-62%showed effects,13%no effect and 25%inconclusive <br /> Plant Effects-87%showed effects and 13%were inconclusive <br /> Wildlife Effects-62%showed effects,4%no effect and 36%inconclusive <br /> Bee Effects-85%showed effects and 15%no effect <br /> Bird Effects-77%showed effects,10%no effect and 13%inconclusive <br /> "Overall results of this review show three types of effects by base station antennas on the health of people:radiofrequency sickness(RS), <br /> cancer(C)and changes in biochemical parameters(CBP).Considering all the studies reviewed globally(n=38),73.6%(28/38)showed <br /> effects:73.9%(17/23)for radiofrequency sickness,76.9%(10/13)for cancer and 75.0%(6/8)for changes in biochemical parameters...Of <br /> special importance are the studies performed on animals or trees near base station antennas that cannot be aware of their proximity <br /> and to which psychosomatic effects can never be attributed." <br /> It's concerning that the Hawai'i County Planning Department isn't providing detailed information about the potential disadvantages of <br /> broadband and smart grid projects.They seem to be focusing on the benefits without addressing the possible negative impacts, <br /> especially when the island lacks the extra power for it. <br /> https://www.scienced i rect.com/science/article/pii/S240584402414011X: <br /> "However smart grids,being computerized remote-control systems overseeing electricity distribution,are vulnerable to cyberattacks." <br /> 30.5 Siting of new communications facilities shall comply with performance standards and site colocation as stated in the Code. <br /> Hawai'i Planning does NOT explain that they use the word"sitting"to mean the laying of cable underground.The term"siting of new <br /> communications facilities"is extremely confusing.It generally refers to the process of selecting and preparing locations for new <br /> infrastructure,such as towers and cables,needed to support broadband and smart grid projects.This often involves road construction <br /> and can lead to increased traffic and disruptions because these cables need to be laid underground. <br /> These cables could be laid shallow as this site states https://orimex.com/fiber-optic-Internet-going-undergroundh <br /> "The terrain and the local conditions need to be taken into account when considering underground broadband deployment.In rocky <br /> terrain,cable must be laid in a shallow trench." <br /> https://uulsefibre.co.uk/2023/06/15/when-more-is-less-the-risks-and-downsides-of-overbuild/: <br /> "Cost:Fibre optic broadband infrastructure can be an expensive endeavour,especially if it involves duplicating existing networks.This <br /> cost can ultimately be passed on to consumers,making broadband services more expensive and potentially reducing the adoption rate <br /> of fibre optic services. <br /> Inefficiency:As mentioned above,overbuilding can lead to dormant infrastructure,creating wasted resources and increased <br /> environmental impact.This is particularly relevant in the case of fibre optic broadband,where installing fibre can be resource intensive. <br /> Fragmentation:When different service providers own and operate various parts of the infrastructure,it can make it difficult for <br /> consumers to switch between providers and could result in reduced competition. <br /> Legal and regulatory issues:Particularly in cases where existing service providers have exclusive rights to operate in certain areas.This <br /> can result in lengthy legal battles that delay the deployment of new infrastructure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.