HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-03-09 Sherilyn Wells From: Sherilyn Wells
To: Council Testimony;Kimball, Heather; Kaaiwada.Jennifer; Kierkiewicz.Ashley; LPCtestimonv;WPCtestimonv;
Onishi,Dennis; Kanealii-Kleinfelder. Matt;Villeaas. Rebecca;Galimba. Michelle M.;Inaba. Holeka; Hustace.
James;cohmavoolhawaiicountv.aov
Subject: Additional testimony re proposed 2045 plan for Hawai"i County. March 2025 hearing.
Date: Sunday,March 9,2025 10:26:04 PM
Attachments: 20200403 SARS CoV Patent Corpus Lit Review.odf
Hawaii General Plan Proposed Chances 2025 comments by Sherilyn Wells January 2025(4)(2).doc
Proposed 2045 Plan for Hawai.doc
Sherilyn Wells March 2025 testimony on the proposed 2045 Plan, supplement to January 2025
testimony.
Many people have already offered expert testimony and very perceptive criticism of this Plan.
Rather than repeat their observations, for this second submission I have chosen to go beneath
the surface, to reveal the nature of the underlying system, the organizations and people, that
appear to be the engine behind many, if not all, of the Plan concepts.
Let's bring everything into the light: "The phrase "sunlight is the best disinfectant" is a
well-known quote by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis,which he used
metaphorically to emphasize the importance of transparency and openness in society and
governance."
FULL TEXT in attachment - Proposed 2045 Plan for Hawaii.
Sherilyn Wells March 2025 testimony on the proposed 2045 Plan, supplement to January
2025 testimony.
Many people have already offered expert testimony and very perceptive criticism of this
Plan.
Rather than repeat their observations, for this second submission I have chosen to go
beneath the surface, to reveal the nature of the underlying system,the organizations and
people,that appear to be the engine behind many,if not all, of the Plan concepts.
Let's bring everything into the light: "The phrase "sunlight is the best disinfectant" is a
well-known quote by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis,which he used
metaphorically to emphasize the importance of transparency and openness in society and
governance."
L RESPONSE REQUIRED as per HRS §226-109(9)—page 2
IL ARE YOU PREPARED TO ADDRESS ONE VERY REAL (SUPER WEALTHY)
ISSUE?—page 3
III. PRO FORMA vs. REALLY INCORPORATING TESTIMONY—HOW WILL
THIS PROCESS END?—page 3
IV. HALT THE SLIDE INTO A "WEE GREAT RESET CLONE" PLAN—page 4
V. DR DAVID MARTIN ON TRIGGERS USED TO CALL FOR THE GREAT RESET
—page 5
VI. PYRAMID—page 5
VII. USING CRISES—page 6
VIII. WHERE'S HOMEOWNER? —page 6
IX. HAPPINESS,PROPERTY,AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT—page 7
X. PROPERTY AND PERSONHOOD BY MARGARET JANE RADIN—page 8
XI. CONNECTING STAKEHOLDERS TO COVID/CRISIS (WEF)—page 8
XII. WEF: COVID WAS A LITMUS TEST FOR"STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM"—
page 9
XIII. DR DAVID MARTIN'S RESEARCH—page 9
XIV. THE COVID ORCHESTRA INCLUDES WEF—NAMING NAMES. page 11
XV. MEDIA OWNERSHIP DICTATES CONTENT (Manipulation System Mouthpiece
—MSM)—page 12
XVI. PHILANTHROPY.. or is it? PUBLIC RETENTION OF POWER. -page 14
XVII. ARTFUL LANGUAGE ON BEHALF OF DECEPTION—page 14
XVIII. LIFE EXPERIENCE—page 14
XIX. Hawai'i General Plan re Proposed Changes in 2025—Submission Number One
(January 2025)—page 15
XX. Article-Editor of major newspaper says he planted stories for CIA—page 28
XXI. Article-Dr. David Martin Exposes the Names and Faces of the People Who Are
Killing Humanity; Red Pill Expo,November 19,2021 —page 31
XXIL Article- TRANSCRIPT Of Dr David E. Martin's Speech At The European Union
Parliament, Covid Summit,MAY 2023—page 39
XXIIL Article -Breaking The WEF Matrix: How To Resist The Great Reset -page 45
1. RESPONSE REQUIRED as per HRS §226-109(9)
1 am including my January testimony again re the requirement, as per HRS §226-109 (9)
(a statute cited in the Plan), for a response to this new information on the topic of climate
change.
HRS §226-109(9) -Use management and implementation approaches that encourage the
continual collection, evaluation, and integration of new information and strategies into
new and existing practices,policies, and plans; and
The 2045 Plan language does not reflect the broader, more scientific nature of
comprehensive (not limited to alleged anthropogenic) climate change studies, as
well as noting where there are uncertainties or deficiencies in the data and
conclusions.
• It does not reflect where there is professional dissent(reminiscent of the
censorship/exclusion of professional Covid dissent at the beginning).
• It does not address studies that show positive effects from increasing CO2.
• The Plan does not address the missing elements and inabilities of climate change
modeling systems.
• The Plan does not address the emergence of new energy systems, already patented,
awaiting sufficient political support for their release, systems that will NOT
introduce greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Relevant terms like Zero Point
and Free Energy, etc., are nowhere in the Plan.
11. ARE YOU PREPARED TO ADDRESS ONE VERY REAL (SUPER WEALTHY)
ISSUE?
1
Given the great transfer of wealth during Covid , from the lower and middle class into
a growing group of(existing and) newly created super wealthy...
Where is the REAL (no holds barred) discussion re robust, community-driven solutions
to -
• address affordability and availability of housing ownership when wealthy
corporations/individuals buy up properties well above market value,putting home
ownership even further out of reach for the "average"local resident and
significantly altering the property taxes of surrounding homeowners (a backdoor
approach to gradually,financially forcing them out, too?) -PAGE 181 —Housing
Challenges;
• a discussion about how to protect the integrity and the "fabric" of communities
when local businesses who have been a part of the community, some for decades or
longer, are suddenly closed down after wealthy corporations/individuals buy up the
land beneath them;
• a discussion about how much disproportionate influence we can then expect these
super wealthy "stakeholders" to have on our community development and
planning processes,including via their public/private projects (see who comprises
the WEF Great Reset stakeholders in footnote 3 — hint—it's NOT the average
person). And take the verb "improving" (quote below)with a huge grain of salt...
"One of the stated aims of the WEF is that it will be "...committed to
improving the state of the world through public private cooperation."
htt sn .//thegeopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-great-reset/
CONCLUSION:
MISSING from the plan: this issue of the SUPER WEALTHY and their impact on our
island, our ohana, our community. More below on the need for private/public
partnership transparency at the inception of any process.
III. PRO FORMA vs. REALLY INCORPORATING TESTIMONY—HOW WILL
THIS PROCESS END?
I've attended many meetings where it was clear that hearings were "pro forma," done
for the purpose of fulfilling a legal or statutory requirement, but without any intention of
actually reflecting on, of incorporating or integrating, any testimony that goes contrary
to the plan that's already been chosen behind closed doors.
Donna Thompson of Waimea, whose excellent testimony I herein incorporate via reference,
has made similar observations.
IV. HALT THE SLIDE INTO A "WEF GREAT RESET CLONE" PLAN
You can still step back from this slippery slope and HALT THE SLIDE towards the
ultimate result of creating,in "2045," a WEF-Great-Reset-like plan (Agenda 21, as per
Ms. Thompson), but it may well require refusing to let this island's backroom power
players have their way and empowering the people instead.
In June 2019, the WEFsigned a Strategic Partnership Framework agreement with
the United Nations. The WEF and the UN agreed to collaboratively "accelerate
the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: milestones
to complete the UN's plan for the 21st century, also known as Agenda 2121 —the
UN's vision for a centrally managed global society. The policies required to
achieve these sustainable development goals (SDGs) are developed by themulti
stakeholder partnership. https://e f�gazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-great-
reset
Even in the face of growing widespread opposition, governments are pursuing
WEF's strategy as it is no secret that the international organisation has managed
to infiltrate them through its Young Global Leaders.
https://thegeopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-great-reset/
In his book, Kahn explores subverting democracy by training a certain group in
society as potential leaders,with those pre-selected few groomed for power being
able to define what our shared values as a society should be. Sound familiar?
Today's World Economic Forum's Young Global Leader scheme is the exact
manifestation of his original proposal. In essence,they will hold all the cards,
whilst the common people will be left with illusory pseudo-democratic processes,
poverty, and constant absurd psychological operations (P Y P ) to sow chaos
and distract us all unceasingly. https://Xfsmagazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-
great-reset
Sidenote— one of my Waimea friends recently asked the Mayor if this plan will go
forward regardless of all the citizen opposition and the Mayor's reply was that we
DON'T have to adopt the 2045 Plan.. (Now THERE's a concept.)
Just remember —WEF's oh-so-well-crafted rhetoric (the velvet glove) seldom matches
their intended outcome (the iron fist inside the glove). 2Focus group research and
decades of mind control research by our government and universities give these elite
groups "pathways into persuasion" that don't have to reflect reality.
1. Velvet glove— Covid concerns.
2. Velvet glove— climate change* concerns (*the erroneous WEF-type—see my January
testimony about a more comprehensive and scientific approach).
3. Iron fist—control over the public.
SMART city— Surveilling the Masses And Restricting Transactions (thanks to China for
showing us the reality,within a "SMART" city, of consequences for failure to follow
prescribed social actions).
V. DR DAVID MARTIN ON TRIGGERS USED TO CALL FOR THE GREAT RESET
Refer to Dr. David Martin's research and information,included below,in which he
presents the evidence for WEF's disingenuous history with Covid and the experimental
injection (which they secretly co-participated in creating, then used as a rationale for
launching their Great Reset).
WEF is NOW using "climate change" as the new,post-Covid driver to impose their
control agenda.
Notice how much the deliberately limited. non-comprehensive. WEF version of"climate
change"is used in this 2045 plan. Why use something so flawed, unless it was in service
to an agenda, ergo NOT a commitment to best available science?
See my January testimony for a more science-based consideration of climate change.
VI. PYRAMID
Therefore, this plan is a pyramid attempting to look like a level playing field,in which
the pyramid's capstone will be a small cadre of"stakeholders al" (WEF term, used 86
limts in the proposed plan) and many of the goals (and omissions)look remarkably
similar to the WEF Great Reset. For instance, observe this Plan-consultant's profile:
Consultants, Page 2; Page 86, footnote 3 — SMART GROWTH AMERICA
Smart Growth America focuses on threespecific priorities: Climate change and
resilience, advancing racial equity, and creating healthy communities.
https:Hsmartgrowthamerica.org/our-work/
Great Reset— a glob alist-driven initiative to establish Schwab's vision
of stakeholder capitalism,where corporations are positioned as "trustees of
society" to address the world's economic and social woes.
https:Hyfsmagazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-great-reset
Therefore,it is important to now address WEF as the background basis for 2045's
characteristics,in the hopes that the 2045 planners might want to seriously reconsider
whether taking cues —covertly -from WEF is truly in the best interests of the people of
this island, this state.
And here's why...
VIL USING CRISES
Unfortunately, WEF history is typically that of pursuing more centralized control of and
power over the individual, the public, regardless of deceptive rhetoric claiming
otherwise.
The opportunistic use and/or deliberate creation of"crises"IQ area common tool for
expanding control (see WEF articles on taking advantage of Covid to advance
stakeholder capitalism).
A more sinister aspect of the WEF/Covid connection is revealed by Dr. David Martin's
research,which will be referenced below (see also Footnote 4).
VIII. WHERE'S HOMEOWNER?
WEF's 2018 Predictions for 2030: "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy."
It is telling that THE TERM "STAKEHOLDER" IN THE 2045 PLAN'S GLOSSARY
DOES NOT EXPLICITLY INCLUDE HOMEOWNER, nor do we find HOMEOWNER
elsewhere in the document. In litigation citing a statute or code, the deliberate absence of
a term is considered dispositive.
In this plan, there are:
EIGHTY-SIX (86) matches for STAKEHOLDER.
ZERO (0) matches for HOMEOWNER(although Homeownership does show up twice).
There are also NO matches for SELF SUFFICIENT,which is a cornerstone of how
people are better able to weather change and maintain their freedom and personal
power. Coincidence?
Freedom is the greatest fruit of self-sufficiency.
Epicurus
IX. HAPPINESS, PROPERTY, AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT
This article reviews the WEF's 2018 prediction for 2030 - "You'll own nothing. And
you'll be happy" - and finds property ownership to be a cornerstone of personal
happiness.
A future with no individual ownership is not a happy one:Property theory shows
why.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/SO016328723001131
The greatest fine art of the future will be the making of a comfortable living from
a small piece of land.
Abraham Lincoln
Notice that"..the pursuit of happiness"was considered a self-evident truth and
unalienable RIGHT,important enough by the founders of this nation to be mentioned in
the preamble of one of our country's foundational documents.
Therefore, happiness of the people is an important benchmark indicating "success" as
further development of our island communities takes place.
"You'll own nothing. Anrl you'll be happy." This prediction, based on just one of
eight made by the World Economic Forum's (REF) network of Global Future
Councils (Parker. 2016), assumed this expression in a video produced by the REF in
November 2016.As a tool intended to disseminate its content, the video was
published both to the REF's own website4 and its Facebook page,!and was then
shared across other media platforms...
Very few of the commentO could be characterised as being in any sense positive
toward the prediction.
After the WEF announcer.its `Great Reset'agenda to the world.in June 2020
(Schwab. 2020), reaction to the prediction became stronger and lower still.
COVID-19 was identified as the principal reason for pursuing the agenda, but the
WEF claimer.that it also addressed the "...climate and social crises"emerging even
before the pandemic's onset(Schwab. 2020).
A diverse cross-section of concerned citizenry across the world was, however, having
none of it.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/nii/SO016328723001131
X. PROPERTY AND PERSONHOOD BY MARGARET JANE RADIN
Margaret Jane Radin is known for her influential article "Property and Personhood,"
which was published in the Stanford Law Review in 1982.
This article has been cited over 700 times and has been recognized as one of the 100 most
cited law review articles of all time.
In this article, Radin argues that individuals require secure control over certain aspects
of their external environment in the form of properly rights to achieve Wiper self-
development or personhood.
She also discusses how property rights for personhood serve as a justification for
property rights in general and for some current schemes of property entitlement.
In the article Professor Radin makes a compelling case that proper self-development, or
personhood, requires individuals to have secure control over certain things—e.g., one's
home residence—in their external environment in the form of property rights.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/45457879_Property_and_Personhood_Revisited
XI. CONNECTING STAKEHOLDERS TO COVID/CRISIS (WEF)
The changes we have already seen in response to COVID-19 prove that a reset of our
economic and social foundations is possible.
This is our best chance to instigate stakeholder capitalism- and here's how it can be
achiever.
http s://www.wefo rum.org/stories/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/
XIL WEF: COVID WAS A LITMUS TEST FOR "STAKEHOLDER CAPITALISM"
According to WEF, Covid 19 is a litmus test for stakeholder capitalism—with remotely
tracking people and remote teaching lauded by WEF as great examples of how a
company can meet that stakeholder capitalism goal.
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/03/covid-l9-is-a-litmus-test-for-stakeholder-
ca_pitalism/
By contrast, other companies used profits to invest in digital transformation, talent,
research and development, and their customer relations. That now gives them an
ability to react that other companies lack. Microsoft,for example, ranked first in
JUST Capital's stakeholder companies ranking, is a collaborator on Johns Hopkins'
coronavirus tracker, and is providing teachers with access and training for its Teams
program to teach remotely. It can do so because of its business model, but also
because its stakeholders expect it to step up at times such as these.
XIIL DR DAVID MARTIN'S RESEARCH
6
Dr. David Martin was able, thanks to his remarkable CV and decades of investigative
work for the government, to track patents and the history of Covid.
See attached document-20200403_SARS_CoV_Patent_Corpus_Lit_Review.pdf.
The perpetrators' (including WEF) shocking willingness to inflict harm via the Covid
experience (see Dr. David Martin's Red Pill Expo, November 19, 2021,talk in the video
7
link )is in utter/complete antagonism to Hawai'i's values of ALOHA, as described in
8
the state statute. And remember, WEF used Covid to trot out The Great Reset,which
this 2045 Plan emulates.
As Dr. Martin points out,if any of his facts are false, he could be sued. And no one has...
The following quote should be a massive wakeup call to the public re those behind the
unleashing of Covid and the experimental injections:
"So .. the fact of the matter is, they actually stated in 2014 that this was about
investors responding if they see profit at the end of the process."
Dr. David Martin I National Citizens Inquiry Canada I March 6th 20251
Edmonton, Alberta
https://rumble,com/v6gds3o-national-citizens-inquiry-with-dr.-david-martin-
march-6th-2025-edmonton-alb.html?e9s=src_vl_ucp
Dr. Martin was also invited to speak at the European Union Parliament's Covid Summit
in 2023. https://rumble.com/v2ncp8w-dr-david-e.-martin-phd-covid-summit-european-
union-parliament-may-2023.html
XIV. THE COVID ORCHESTRA INCLUDES WEF—NAMING NAMES
Dr. Martin refers to the major players orchestrating the plandemic as The Covid
Orchestra, his research having proved that it was accurate to designate Covid and the
experimental injection as a planned event(plandemic).
Even in the face of growing widespread opposition, governments are pursuing
WEF's strategy as it is no secret that the international organisation has managed
to infiltrate them through its Young Global Leaders.
htt sp .//thegeopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-great-reset/
The full article, summarizing Dr. Martin's Red Pill Expo speech and identifying the
organizations, as well as the people,involved in creating the plandemic,is reproduced at
the bottom of this testimony. In the meantime, notice that WEF is represented FOUR
TIMES in the "Covid Orchestra" of major players.
Excerpt from Dr. David Martin's speech at the Red Pill Expo:
THE COVID ORCHESTRA
"But this, Ladies and Gentlemen is the slide you wanted to see. This is actually the
names and faces of the people who are,in fact killing humanity. And that's ALL
of them. ...Let's make sure that we don't ever forget the names and the faces of
the people who decided to kill us..."
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe, Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees WEF
Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman, WEF
Marc Benioff, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce, WEF Trustee,
WEF Young Global Leader
Luis Alberto Moreno, WEF Young Global Leader
(Aerilyn—the remainder of the Orchestra list is at the end of this testimony, where
the full article- about the extensive origins of/patents associated with Covid and the
experimental injection -is reprinted).
As Dr. Martin points out,if any of his facts are false, he could be sued. And no one has...
This list is a horrifying indictment, but words alone cannot begin to impress upon us the
true/ultimate consequences of following any plan mapped out,in part, by such an
organization.
SO... let's personalize what happened to humanity as a result of that trigger for THE
GREAT RESET (Great Reset being a role model this plan is following).
Start by watching these links, a testament to the death and damage unleashed on
humanity via all those companies and people named by Dr. David Martin.
FOLLOW THE SILENCED
https://followthesilenced.com/
"the filmmakers uncovered a larger story behind a successful campaign to conceal the true scope
of injuries from these vaccines"
WITNESS STATEMENT
https://rumble,com/v6px9fk-witness-statement-australian-documentary-biggest-crime-
in-human-history-j an.html?e9s=re1_v2_nr
Japan's most senior cancer doctor: COVID shots are `essentially murder'
https://www.lifesitenews,com/news/japans-most-senior-cancer-doctor-covid-shots-are-
essentially-murder/
Dr. Michael Goodkin -Letter to HHS Secretary RFK Jr.: `I Urge You to Act Now.
Expose the Corruption.'
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/michael-goodkin-letter-hhs-secretary-rik-jr-
expose-corru tp ion/
XV. MEDIA OWNERSHIP DICTATES CONTENT (Manipulation System Mouthpiece
—MSM)
I add this part because,while we're looking at this WEF role model, the WEF also
stressed what THEY called misinformation in the obstacles to getting their Great Reset
underway.
Of course,what they called misinformation proved to be accurate information... it just
did not support their WEF-control agenda.
9
Complicit media,whose ownership is now concentrated in six companies , come in
handy for the power brokers to narrow information available to the public in order to
create a preferred public response. That is just as true here in Hawai'i as elsewhere.
Cooperation with/involvement/infiltration of the intelligence agencies is also common.
William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer,in his testimony before the
Senate Intelligence Committee, said:
"There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don't need to
manipulate Time magazine, for example, because there are [Central Intelligence]
Agency people at the management level."
And then there's Project Mockingbird(see Church Committee testimony and report).
German journalist Udo Ulfkotte authored a confessional titled Presstitutes Embedded In
The Pay Of The CIA, further proving that the CIA's Project Mockingbird infiltration of
mainstream media is still "alive and well."
Udo also mentions George Soros (who is affiliated with WEF and is a regular speaker at
their DAVOS meetings).
So when you see SOROS/OPEN SOCIETY, also think WEF. When it says "American" in
the next excerpt, Udo means CIA.
Udo: "Those dismissive of the role of the financier George Soros will be interested
to learn of the prominence the Soros backed European Council of Foreign Relations
plays in policy formation, something UyWotte experienced first hand...how Soros
was part and parcel of the political regime in Germany, and essential to efforts
expanding American hegemony in Eastern and Central Europe.
Udo Ulfkotte, deceased German journalist and author of the confessional,
Presstitutes Embedded In The Pay Of The CIA.
https://www.theburkean.ie/articles/2020/09/20/udo-ulfkotte-was-a-nationalist-
journalist-murdered-in-germany
This next article, based on leaked internal documents (CCDH),poses a powerful question
about censorship. Once again, notice the Soros connection,intelligence agencies, etc.
Are U.S. Taxpayers Funding `Corrupt Dark-money Network' That Censored CHD, RFK
Jr. and Others?
A new analysis of government spending shows that several U.S. taxpayer funded
organizations are linked to the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
Last year, reporting by Thacker and Matt Taibbi, based on internal documents
leaked by CCDH insiders, revealed that CCDH planned to "kill" X, shut down
popular social media accounts on other platforms, censor non-establishment
voices and"bring back" attacks on "antivaxx" voices, among other things.
According to the documents, CCDH planned to organize "black ops" against
Kennedy,who was a U.S.presidential candidate at the time. The group also
planned to pressure Substack to remove COVID-19 vaccine critics Mercola and
Alex Berenson from its platform.
A subsequent investigation by Ji traced some of the organizations that financially
support CCDH,including several U.K.-based nonprofits affiliated with legacy
media organizations, the U.K. government and major philanthropic organizations
such as the Open Society Foundations (Soros) and the Ford Foundation.
"These hidden contributions reveal a coordinated pipeline of financial influence
involving U.S.intelligence-adjacent entities, UK Crown interests, and Soros-
backed organizations like the Tides Foundation," Ji wrote.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-taxpayer-funds-ccdh-dark-money
censorship rfk-jr-chd/
XVL PHILANTHROPY.. or is it? PUBLIC RETENTION OF POWER.
A power/control chess move is often disguised as philanthropy, too (just look at Bill
Gates as one example,whose philanthropy "somehow" seemed to routinely/exponentially
increase his personal wealth—vaccine stocks bought, then sold,with remarkably
prescient timing— and to increase his influence—GAVI, WHO).
SO—public/private partnerships MUST be transparent,projects required to be revealed
at the inception of the process and examined VERY closely to ensure that NO such
transfer of power away from the citizens is taking place as quid pro quo .
***How this public retention of power might be achieved is another topic worthy of
soliciting deeper community input/solutions.***
XVII. ARTFUL LANGUAGE ON BEHALF OF DECEPTION
The language employed by plans following in the footsteps of the Great Reset(whose
ultimate, albeit hidden,purpose is to reduce choice/freedom) may adeptly hide the true
intent, thanks in part to (1) focus group research to learn which phrases are most
persuasive for the general public and(2) decades of mind control experimentation (e.g.,
Monarch,MKUltra, etc.), as revealed by whistleblowers like Cathy O'Brien (Access
Denied For Reasons Of National Security; The Tranceformation of America).
XVIIL LIFE EXPERIENCE
I have been -
• a former public interest environmental litigator (including in favor of growth
management),
• a former co-president of the Washington Environmental Council who helped craft
legislative language for amendments to the state statute RCW 36.70A,
• a former Board member of the Washington Toxics Coalition,
• a co-founder of and reporter for a local newspaper that didn't depend on external
agents for its funding (ergo was not obligated to slant the news in favor of any
particular monied entity),
• a co-founder of a local environmental organization (Watershed Defense Fund,
which became the Clean Water Alliance),
• a former candidate for countywide public office (Democrat, although the office
itself was non-partisan),
• a speaker within the educational system on both (1)issues of the day and(2) active
citizenship,
• a mother/grandmother whose stake in a positive future is thus both personal as
well as societal,
• a relative of people (1)who covertly worked for the CIA and (2)who were high-
security-clearance law enforcement on an international border (and who witnessed
the corruption within our system,too), and
• I was raised in countries which did not enjoy even the appearance of a democratic
process, so my appreciation for a constitutional republic and genuine, accurate
elections* (*which we do NOT yet have in Hawai'i—lots of evidence on that topic!)
is amplified.
1
https:Htotainews.com/another-massive-transfer-of-wealth-incoming(
lZ
Breaking The WEF Matrix: How To Resist The Great Reset- http://Ifsmagazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-
resist-th e-great-reset/
The WEF and the Great Reset by Wasif Chaudry
htt :/n /thegeopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-great-reset/
"A global network of stakeholder capitalist partners are collaborating to usher in
what they claim to be a new model of enhanced democratic accountability that includes
"civil society." Continued...
However, beneath their deceptive use of the term civil society lies an ideology which
offers this network an unprecedented degree of political control that threatens to
extinguish representative democracy entirely.
"What is further obfuscated is that civil society stakeholders are selected.
"Representatives from NGOs, religious communities, unions, and philanthropic
foundations are the selected stakeholders whose only role is to agree with the policies
placed on the table by the public-private partnership," Davis adds. Their consent is
deemed your consent. http://Xfsmagazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-great-reset
4
Dr.David Martin:Who "They"Are,"The Names and Faces"-Dr.David Martin Exposes the Names and
Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/202l/l l/2O/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-
names-and-faces
Dr.David Martin reveals Fauci's Trail of Covid Patents' since 2002(includes additional links to source
documents)
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/07/12/breaking-news-patents-filed-in-america-
as-far-back-as-2002-concerning-sars-cov-2-coronavirus
Dr.David Martin's Covid Bioweapon Speech at'An Injection of Truth' Town Hall Held March 3/25 in
Calgary,Alberta
https://rumble,com/v6g6rt2-dr-david-martin-calgary.htmI
WEF article (ah,the irony if you've read Dr. David Martin's evidence) -A New York
simulation showed we weren't prepared for coronavirus. But it's not too late to act
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/03/covid-19-coronavirus-new-york-simulation-
lessons-not-too-late-to-act/
1-5-1 "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy" is a phrase from 2018 predictions for 2030
published by the World Economic Forum, cited as being based on input from members
of the World Economic Forum Global Futures Councils,likely in turn based on a 2016
article in which Danish Social Democrat Ida Auken outlines her vision of the future.
Dr. David Martin is the founding CEO of M•CAM Inc. M•CAM is the international leader in intellectual property-
based financial risk management. From auditing patent quality for governments and patent offices,to providing
state-of-the-art actuarial risk management systems and solutions to the largest banks and insurance companies,
M•CAM has established a global standard in patent quality and commercial validity assessment and management.
A spokesperson for global intellectual property accountability and quality reform, Dr. Martin has worked closely with
the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe and Asia,
in advocating and deploying infrastructure to support growing reliance on proprietary rights in business
transactions. M•CAM has supported the modernization of intellectual property,tax,and accounting laws through its
work with oversight agencies and policy makers.
Dr. Martin has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations and serves of several boards.
He was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc.,a company that developed and commercialized advanced
computational linguistics technologies,dynamic data compression and encryption technologies,electrical field
transmission technology,medical diagnostics,and stealthlanechoic technology. He was a founding member of
Japan's Institute for Interface Science&Technology. He founded and served as Executive Director of the
Charlottesville Venture Group. He has served as a board member for the Research Institute for Small and Emerging
Business(Washington D.C.),the Academy for Augmenting Grassroots Technological Innovations(India),the IST
(Japan)the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce(Virginia),and the Charlottesville Industrial
Development Agency(Virginia).
As former Assistant Professor at the University of Virginia's School of Medicine, Dr. Martin founded the University's
first wholly-owned,for-profit, research and development and technology transfer corporation. Engaged in domestic
and international technology transfer, clinical research,and financing,this company pioneered new techniques
innovation management that have become industry standards.In 1999, Dr. Martin was appointed by the Governor of
the Commonwealth of Virginia to serve on the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and has served the
General Assembly and Virginia's Center for Innovative Technology on numerous occasions.
Dr. Martin's work with the Batten Institute at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the
University of Virginia and his related work at the Indian Institute for Management in Ahmedabad India has brought
unprecedented curricular focus to areas of intangible asset risk management,finance,and accounting standards.In
addition to his academic work, Dr. Martin has closely advised intellectual property based finance and investment
programs in India,China, Denmark,the European Union,the United Kingdom,South Africa,the Islamic Republic of
Iran,the United States,and the United Arab Emirates.
Dr. Martin has publications in law,medicine,engineering,finance and education. He maintains active research in the
fields of linguistic genomics,fractal financial risk modeling,as well as continuing his over 15 years of research in
cellular membrane ionic signaling.
https://www.wil2o.int/meetings/en/2006/scp of ae 06/speakers/martin.htmi
https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/
Dr.David Martin:Who"They"Are,"The Names and Faces"-Dr.David Martin Exposes the Names and
Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity
https://www.algora.com/Algora blog/2021/11/20/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-
names-and-faces
Dr.David Martin reveals Fauci's Trail of Covid Patents' since 2002 (includes additional links to source
documents)
https://www.algora.com/Algora—blog/2021/07/12/breaking-news-patents-filed-in-america-
as-far-back-as-2002-concerning-sars-cov-2-coronavirus
Dr.David Martin's Covid Bioweapon Speech at'An Injection of Truth' Town Hall Held March 3/25 in
Calgary,Alberta
https:Hrumble.com/v6g6rt2-dr-david-martin-calgare
Dr. David E. Martin PhD.—Covid Summit—European Union Parliament May 2023
https://rumble,com/v2ncp8w-dr-david-e.-martin-nhd-covid-summit-euro_pean-union-
narliament-may-2023.htm1
8
https://www.hawaii.edu/uhwo/clear/home/lawaloha.html
§ 5-7.5 "Aloha Spirit". (a) "Aloha Spirit" is the coordination of mind and heart within
each person. It brings each person to the self.Each person must think and emote good
feelings to others. In the contemplation and presence of the life force, "Aloha",the
following unuhi laula loa may be used:
"Akahai", meaning kindness to be expressed with tenderness;
"Lokahi", meaning unity, to be expressed with harmony;
"`Olu`olu" meaning agreeable,to be expressed with pleasantness;
"Ha`aha`a", meaning humility, to be expressed with modesty;
"Ahonui", meaning patience,to be expressed with perseverance.
These are traits of character that express the charm,warmth and sincerity of Hawaii's
people. It was the working philosophy of native Hawaiians and was presented as a gift to
the people of Hawaii. "Aloha" is more than a word of greeting or farewell or a
salutation. "Aloha" means mutual regard and affection and extends warmth in caring
with no obligation in return. "Aloha" is the essence of relationships in which each person
is important to every other person for collective existence. "Aloha" means to hear what is
not said,to see what cannot be seen and to know the unknowable.
(b) In exercising their power on behalf of the people and in fulfillment of their
responsibilities, obligations and service to the people, the legislature, governor,lieutenant
governor, executive officers of each department,the chief justice, associate justices, and
judges of the appellate, circuit, and district courts may contemplate and reside with the
life force and give consideration to the "Aloha Spirit". [L 1986, c 202, § 11
9
https://www.webfx.com/blog/internet/the-6-companies-that-own-almost-all-media-
infographic104 /
Cambridge Dictionary: something that you give to someone in return for them
giving something back to you:
a quid pro quo -It's all legal as long as contributions aren't a quid roguo for political
favors.
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
The following data is being made publicly available for the
Commons by M 'CAM International LLC based on a series of
reviews of patent literature derived from references found in:
A novel bat coronavirus reveals natural insertions at the S I/S2 2 cleavage site of the Spike
protein and a possible recombinant 3 origin of HCoV-79 4 Hong Zhou 1 ,8, Xing Chen2,8, Tao
Hu 1 ,8 , Juan Li 1 ,8, Hao Song3 , Yanran Liu 1 , Peihan Wang 1 5 , Di Liu4 , Jing Yang5 , Edward
C. Holmes6 , Alice C. Hughes2,*, Yuhai Bi5,*, Weifeng Shil ,7,*
The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 Kristian G. Andersenl,2*, Andrew Rambaut3, W. Ian Lipkin4,
Edward C. Holmes5 & Robert F. Garry6,7
And sequences leading to the reporting of genomic epidemiology at https://nextstrain.ora/ncov
Polybasic cleavage site for SARS CoV with novel spike protein and ACE2 RBD
US9834595 Amino acid sequences directed against envelope proteins of a virus and polypeptices comprising 5-Jun-08
29-Oct-15V.
the same for the treatment of viral diseases Ablynx N. 5-Dec-17
US9193780 Amino acid sequences directed against envelope proteins of a virus and polypeptices comprising 5-Jun-08
5-Jun-09V.
the same for the treatment of viral diseases Ablynx N. 24-Nov-15
US20190077847 AMINO ACID SEQUENCES DIRECTED AGAINST ENVELOPE PROTEINS OF A VIRUS AND 5-Jun-08
14-Mar-19 POLYPEPTIDES COMPRISING THE SAME FOR THE TREATMENT OF VIRAL DISEASES Ablynx N.V. 17-Oct-17
14-Mar-19
US20160152693 AMINO ACID SEQUENCES DIRECTED AGAINST ENVELOPE PROTEINS OF A VIRUS AND 5-Jun-08
2-Rui-16 POLYPEPTIDES COMPRISING THE SAME FOR THE TREATMENT OF VIRAL DISEASES Ablynx N.V. 29-Oct-15
2-Jun-16
Amino acid sequences directed against envelope proteins of a virus and polypeptides comprising 5-Jun-08
US105501747-Oct-17V
the same for the treatment of viral diseases Ablynx N.V.N4-Feb-20
US10407492 Amino acid sequences directed against envelope proteins of a virus and polypeptices comprising 5-Jun-08
17-Oct-17the same for the treatment of viral diseases Ablynx N.V. 10-Sep-19
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
0-linked glycans and SARS CoV Spike Protein Data disclosures
r� Priority
Document date
number Assignee name File date
Issue
h— JENEEMENNEEMML —AREM date
r18-Nov-13
U59644180 Synthetic membrane receiver complexes RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 112-Jun-15
9-May-17
27-Mar-09
USS741311 Methods and compositions for immunization against virus Academia Sinica 26-Mar-10
�3-Jun-14
r
Technische Universitaet Carolo- 121-Sep-05
U58735416 Antiviral therapies 23-Apr-12
Wilhelmina zu Braunschweig 27-May-14
r 15-Apr-99
US7604960 Transient protein expression methods Crucell Holland B.V. 11-Jun-07
20-Oct-09
r 27-Mar-09
US20200046826 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMMUNIZATION AGAINST VIRUS Academia Sinica 4-Jun-19
13-Fe-20
13-Feb-20
20200040042 �30-Mar-17
US CHIMERIC MOLECULES AND USES THEREOF Not Available 29-Mar-18
6-202
6-Feb-20
18-Nov-13
US20200002674 ERYTHROID CELLS COMPRISING PHENYLALANINE HYDROXYLASE Not Available 16-Sep-19
2-Jan-20
2-Jan-20
US201.90376034 PLATELETS COMPRISING EXOGENOUS POLYPEPTIDES AND USES 18-Nov-13
Not Available 23-Aug-19
1z-Dee-19 THEREOF 12-Dec-19
US20190316091 V-Oct-19
-Nov-13
l 019 ERYTHROID CELLS COMPRISING ARGINASE Not Available -May-19
US20190316090 r18-Nov-13
l 019 ERYTHROID CELLS COMPRISING ARGININE DEIMINASE (RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 30-May-19
17-Oct-19
18-Nov-13
US20190316089 II
1� 019 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 10-May-19
17-Oct-19
18-Nov-13
US20190309262IERYTHROID CELLS COMPRISING SERINE DEHYDRATASE Not Available 4-Jun-19
10-opt-19
10-Oct-19
US20190309261I 118-Nov-13
10-oet-19 ERYTHROID CELLS COMPRISING LYSINE OXIDASE Not Available 4-Jun-19
10-Oct-19
US20190264177 18-Nov-13
29-Aug.19 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 10-May-19
29-Aug-19
US20190263934 FC VARIANTS WITH ENHANCED BINDING TO FCRN AND PROLONGED 26-Jan-18
Not Available 25-Jan-19
29-Aug-19 HALF-LIFE 129-Aug-19
S20190144827 18-Nov-13
U
16-May-19 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 19-Nov-18
16-May-19
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
US20180265847 18-Nov-13
zo2018 SYNTHETIC MEM BRAN E-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 29-Mar-18
20-Sep-18
US20180216067 �18-Nov-13
2-Aug-18 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES INot Available 29-Mar-18
2-Aug-18
8-Nov-13
US20180208897 12018 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 19-Mar-18
26-Jul-18
18-Nov-13
US20180187154 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 20-Feb-18
5-Jul-18
I5-Jul-18
18-Nov-13
US20180187153
5 01 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 20-Feb-18
15-Jul-18
US20180135012 MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEX THERAPEUTICS Not Available 1117-May-18
13-May-16
17-May-18
UUS20180030411 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 11-Feb-18
13-Occt-17
1 Feb-18
US20170369843 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 1128-Dec-17
29-Mar-17
28-Dee-17r
US20170174783 Single-Arm Monovalent Antibody Constructs and Uses Thereof Not Available 120-Oct 16
22-Jun-17
22-Jun-17
US20160257932 GENETICALLY ENGINEERED ENUCLEATED ERYTHROID CELLS '[118-Nov-13
8 2016 COMPRISING A PHENYLALANINE AMMONIA LYASE RECEIVER Not Available 17-May-16
POLYPEPTIDE 8-Sep-16
27-Mar-09
US20150335728-r15 METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMMUNIZATION AGAINST VIRUS Academia Sinica 18-Feb-14
�26-Nov-15
18-Nov-13
US20150306212
z9-Oct-15 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 12-Jun-15
29-Oct-15
�C13-Dec-12
US20150297677 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING VIRAL ENTRY Children Medical Center Corporation 12-Dec-13
22-Oct-15
I J22-Oct-15
_[�
US20150182588 18-Nov-13
z 01 SYNTHETIC MEMBRANE-RECEIVER COMPLEXES Not Available 23-Dec-14
I 2-Jul-15
10-May-12
US20150125449 201 Single-Arm Monovalent Antibody Constructs and Uses Thereof Not Available 8-May-13
1�7-May-15
r21-Sep-05
US20140113923- 14r-14 NOVEL ANTIVIRAL THERAPIES Not Available 23-Apr-12
1124-Apr-14
US20100247571 r ar-09
27-M
3o-se�lo METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMMUNIZATION AGAINST VIRUS ACADEMIA SINICA 26-Mar-10
1i30-Sep-10
US20090042793 r21-Sep-05
lz-Feb-o9 Novel Antiviral Therapies BALZARINI JAN 21-Sep-06
02-Feb-09
US20080113409 r15-Apr-99
15-May-o8 Transient protein expression methods HATEBOER GUUS 1-Jun-07
.15-May-08
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
18-Nov-13
US10557119 Erythroid cells comprising phenylalanine ammonia lyase RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 10-May-19
1�11-Feb-20
r18-Nov-13
FUS103144263 Synthetic membrane receiver complexes RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 29-Mar-17
9-Jul-19
.... .... .... _
18-Nov-13
US10329531 Synthetic membrane-receiver complexes RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 13-Oct-17
[�25-Jun-19 27-Mar-09
US10307475 Methods and compositions for immunization against virus Academia Sinica 18-Feb-14
4-Jun-19
18-Nov-13
US10301594 Synthetic membrane-receiver complexes RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC 119-Nov-18
�28-May-19
[2i&
-Nov-13
US10301593 Synthetic membrane-receiver complexes RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. -Mar-18
May-19
18-Nov-13
US10253296 Synthetic membrane-receiver complexes RUBIUS THERAPEUTICS, INC. 28-Nov-17
�9-Apr-19
1
SARS-CoV research specifically on ACE2 binding
II Priority
Document date
number Title Assignee name File date
Issue
II date
Ludwi Maximilians-Universitaet 11-Mar-14
US941� (Compositions and methods for treating coronavirus infection Muen hen 8-May-15
16-Aug-16
Vectors expressing SARS immunogens, compositions containing such 20-Jun-03
US8541003 vectors or expression products thereof, methods and assays for making Protein Sciences Corporation 21-Jun-04
and using �24-Sep-13
25-Nov-03
US7750123 Antibodies against SARS-CoV and methods of use thereof Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Inc. 24-Nov-04
1 16-Jul-10
19-May-06
US7728110 Antibodies to SARS coronavirus Amgen, Inc. 21-May-07
�1-Jun-10
E-Apr-10
-Jul-03
US7696330 Binding molecules against SARS-coronavirus and uses thereof Crucell Holland B.V. -Jan-06
US7687475 University of Iowa Research 9-Jul-04
- RNA interference in respiratory epithelial cells Foundation 16-Oct-07
�30-Mar-10
�US7629443 Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against severe acute respiratory 2-Jun-04
New York Blood Center, Inc. 8-Feb-06
syndrome-associated coronavirus �8-Dec-09
K-Oct-09
-Apr-99
US7604960 Transient protein expression methods Crucell Holland B.V. Jun-07
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
Synthetic peptide targeting critical sites on the SARS-associated V-Feb-09
-Nov-04
US7491489 coronavirus spike protein responsible for viral infection and method of use he University of Hong Knog -Oct-05
thereof
Characterization of the earliest stages of the severe acute respiratory Chinese National Human Genome 9-Jul-04
U S7320857 g p y 9-Jul-04
syndrome (SARS) virus and uses thereof Center at Shanghai 22-Jan-08
US7297786 University of Iowa Research 9-Jul-04
- RNA interference in respiratory epitheial cells Foundation 11-Jul-05
20-Nov-07
Antiviral agents for the treatment, control and prevention of infections b 28-Apr-03
U57151163 g p y Sequoia Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 28-Apr-04
r� coronaviruses �19-Dec-06
US20200079781 Substituted 2,4 diamino-quinoline as new medicament for fibrosis, 5-Sep-18
lz-rul20 autophagy and cathepsins B (CTSB), L(CTSL) and D (CTSD) related Not Available 1-Aug-19
diseases 112-Mar-20
�V-Feb-20
-Oct-16
US20200061185 PREFUSION CORONAVIRUS SPIKE PROTEINS AND THEIR USE he Scripps Research Institute -Oct-17
27-Fetr20
13-Jun-18
US20200009244 NANOPARTICLE VACCINES WITH NOVEL STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS Not Available 13-Jun-19
9-Jan-20
�9-Jan-20
US20190328865 I M-Oct-19
-Jul-14
sl2019 IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITION FOR MERS CORONAVIRUS INFECTION Not Available -Nov-17
US20190256579 MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS IMMUNOGENS, he U.S.A., as represented by the 24-Feb-15
22-Aug.19 (ANTIBODIES,AND THEIR USE Secretary, Department of Health 3-May-19
and Human Services 22-Aug-19
US20190194299 MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS NEUTRALIZING P-Jun-19
-Apr-14
27-Jm-19 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF Not Available -Nov-18
11-Apr-16
US20190192691_ 19 REGULATED BIOCIRCUIT SYSTEMS Not Available 11-Apr-17
�27-Jun-19
US20180334480 RAMOT AT TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY 17-Sep-15
22-Nov CORONAVIRUSES EPITOPE BASED VACCINES LTD. 15-Sep-16
�22-Nov-18
11-May-05
FS22_Tv-18
18803328851REDUCED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME Not Available 25-May-18
�22-Nov-18
he United States of America, as 24-Feb-15
US20180244756`MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS IMMUNOGENS, Represented by the Secretary, 24-Feb-16
so-augas (ANTIBODIES, AND THEIR USE Dept. of Health and Human 30-Aug-18
Services
US20180230447 ACTIVE LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT VARIANTS OF ANGIOTENSIN 24-Jan-17
16-Aug.18 CONVERTING ENZYME 2 (ACE2) Northwestern University 24-Jan-18
16-Aug-18
US20180177860 VACCINE CONTAINING VIRUS INACTIVATED BY GREEN TEA EXTRACT,
AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR 11-Jun-15
zs-Jun-ls Not Available 7-Jun
28-Jun-1n-18
US20170158752(MIDDLE EAST RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS NEUTRALIZING 25-Apr-14
8-Jun-17 ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF Not Available 27-Apr-15
8-Jun-17
11-May-05
US20170055566
z_r 1. REDUCED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME Not Available 22-Aug-16
I2-Mar-17
26-Nov-13
US20160376321 A NOVEL SARS IMMUNOGENIC COMPOSITION BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE 21-Nov-14
29-Dee-16
�29-Dec-161
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
US20160082074 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING CORONAVIRUS LUDWIG-MAXIMILIANS- 11-Mar-14
24-Mar-16 INFECTION UNIVERSITAET MUENCHEN 8-May-15
24-Mar-16
13-Dec-12
US20150297677 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING VIRAL ENTRY Children Medical Center Corporation 12-Dec-13
22-Oct-15
22-Oct-15
US20150275183 Human Betacoronavirus Lineage C and Identification of N-Terminal 23-Sep-12
I
1-oeta5 Dipeptidyl Peptid Not Available �1-Oct-15
23-Sep-13ase As Its Virus Receptor
US20150150878 Methods For Inhibiting Viruses By Targeting Cathepsin-L Cleavage Sites 4-Apr-12
4-Jun-15 In The Viruses' Glycoproteins Not Available 4-Apr-13
I4-Jun-15
11-May-05
F26 240174460-1a a (REDUCED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND METHODS OF MAKING SAME ECTOR TOBACCO INC. 10-Dec-13
_jal �26-Jun-14
US20130216566 Vectors expressing SARS immunogens, compositions containing such V-Aug-13
-Jun-03
-013 vectors or expression products thereof, methods and assays for making DAMS DANIEL -Jun-04
and using
11-Aug-10
US20130196903
1-Auga3 Multimeric Inhibitors of Viral Fusion and Uses Thereof V BIO SRL 11-Aug-11
�1-Aug-13
US20100204286 METHOD FOR REDUCING GASTROINTESTINAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF 12-Feb-09
[BYRNES JOHN J 11-Feb-10
1z-AugaO CYTOTOXIC AGENTS �12-Aug-10,
22-Jul-03
US20100172917 Binding molecules against SARS-coronavirus and uses thereof Crucell Holland B.V. 16-Nov-09
8-Jul-10
�8-Jul-10
US20100150923 FUSION PROTEINS OF RECOMBINANT SARS CORONAVIRUS STRUCTURAL Chinese Academy of Medical 20-Jun-05
17-Jut,-10 PROTEINS,THEIR PRODUCTION AND USES Sciences, Institute of Basic Medical 13-Jun-06
Sciences 17-Jun-10
US20100092470 V-Apr-10
-Sep-08
1 201.0 ANTIBODIES,ANALOGS AND USES THEREOF ICB International, Inc. -Sep-09
US20100047767 F4Fe
b-07
S201 PATHOGEN BINDING ITI SCOTLAND LIMITED b-08
eb-10
10-Mar-08
US20100035848 THERAPY FOR DISORDERS OF THE PROXIMAL DIGESTIVE TRACT BARNES THOMAS MICHAEL 10-Mar-09
11-Feb-10
��11-Feb-10
19-Jan-07
US20090304683 Soluble Fragments of The Sars-Cov Spike Glycoprotein DIMITROV DIMITER S 19-Jan-07
10-Dec-09
�10-Dec-09
K-Jul-09
-Oct-07
US20090186014 METHOD FOR TREATMENT OF PANCREATITIS Ore Pharmaceuticals Inc. Oct-08
23-Jul-09
US20090130691 SCREENING PROTEINASE MODULATORS USING A CHIMERIC PROTEIN Institut de Recherches Cliniques de 16-Sep-05
21-May-09 AND SKI-I PROPROTEIN CONVERTASE SUBSTRATES AND INHIBITORS Montreal 14-Sep-06
1121-May-09
28-Feb-06
US20090099259 Method for regulating gene expression ANTHONY JOSHUA 28-Feb-07
16-Apr-09
1116-Apr-09
22-Jul-05
US20090098530 Cell Line For Producing Coronaviruses CRUCELL HOLLAND B.V. 21-Jul-06
16-Apr-09
� 116-Apr-09
11-Jan-06
US200900838�Transgenic Mouse Lines Expressing Human Ace2 and Uses Thereof CHAN TEH-SHENG 11-Jan-07
26-Mar-09
�26-Mar-O9
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
US20080248043 00ct-08
-May-06
9-o Antibodies to SARS coronavirus mgen Inc. -May-07
US20080234345 METHOD FOR REDUCING OR ALLEVIATING INFLAMMATION IN THE 8-Sep-06
Gene Logic Inc. 7-Sep-07
z5-Sep-08 DIGESTIVE TRACT 125-Sep-08
US20080159962 Use of Inhibitors of the Renin-Angiotensin System for the Treatment of IMBA-INSTITUTE FUR MOLEKULARE 19-May-05
3-Jul-08 Lung Injuries BIOTECHNOLOGIE GMBH 19-May-06
�3-Jul-08
US20080113409 15-Apr-99
l5-May-o8 Transient protein expression methods HATEBOER GUUS 1-Jun 07
15-May-08
US20080107650 METHOD FOR TREATING INFLAMMATORY DISEASES OF THE DIGESTIVE 8-Sep-06
Gene Logic Inc. 7-Sep-07
s-May-os TRACT �8-May-08
US20080044437 �L-Feb-08
Sep-04
zl-008 Encapsidation System for Production of Recombinant Virus-Like Particles I
CHEN QUN Sep-05
US20070298498 Adenoviral Amplicon and Producer Cells for the Production of Replication- 2-Nov-04
27-Dee-07 Defective Adenoviral Vectors, Methods of Preparation and Use Thereof CATALUCCI DANIELE 27-Oct-05
�27-Dec-07
L-Oct-07
Nov-06
US20070238681 MODULATION OF ACE2 EXPRESSION BENNETT C F Dec-06
l l-Oct-07
US20070203073 SARS and Ebola inhibitors and use thereof, and methods for their N-Aug-07
-Jun-05
BATES PAUL -Jun-06
30-Aug-07 discovery
8-Mar-05
US20070185044
9-Aug-07 Modulation of ace2 expression BENNETT C F 8-Mar-05
9-Aug-07
US20070185027 ANTIVIRAL AGENTS FOR THE TREATMENT, CONTROL AND PREVENTION 28-Apr-03
9-Aug-07 OF INFECTIONS BY CORONAVIRUSES SEQUOIA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. 9-Nov-06
9-Aug-07
US20070003577 Purified trimeric S protein as vaccine against severe acute respiratory 28-Jun-05
4-Jan-07 syndrome virus infections SUBBARAO KANTA 27-Jun-064-Jan-07
US20060258577 ANTIVIRAL AGENTS FOR THE TREATMENT, CONTROL AND PREVENTION 28-Apr-03
16-Ncv-06 OF INFECTIONS BY CORONAVIRUSES IERICKSON JOHN W 28-Apr-04
�16-Nov-06
10-Apr-03
US20060257852-r06 Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus Chiron Corporation 9-Apr-04
�16-Nov-06
US20060240551 Neutralizing monoclonal antibodies against severe acute respiratory 2-Jun-04
26-oct-06 syndrome-associated coronavirus HE YUXIAN 8-Feb-0626-Oct-06
21-Jul-03
US20060240515 Soluble fragments of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein DIMITROV DIMITER S 19-Jan-06
26-Oct-06
�26-Oct-06
15-Jul-04
US20060199176 Coronavirus S peptides ICHONG PELE C S 14-3ul-05
7-Sep-06
ll7-Sep-06
22-Jul-03
US20060121580 Binding molecules against SARS-coronavirus and uses thereof CRUCELL 20-3an-06
8-Jun-06
l l8-Jun-06
US20060110758 Synthetic peptide targeting critical sites on the SARS-associated 22-Nov-04
2520066 coronavirus spike protein responsible for viral infection and method of use UNIV HONG KONG 28-Oct-05
thereof 25-May-06
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979.7240
M•CAM
INTERNATIONAL
US20060093616 Process for vaccinating eucaryotic hosts and for protecting against SARS- 29-Sep-04
4-May-06 CoV infection LTMEYER RALF 28-Sep-054-May-06
N-Nov-05
-Nov-03
US20050249739 Antibodies against SARS-CoV and methods of use thereof MARASCO WAYNE -Nov-04
]0-Nov-05
10-Mar-04
US20050203038 Modulation of ACE2 expression 10-Mar-04
15-Sep-05
�15-Sep-05
15-Sep-03
US20050113298
26-May Receptor binding peptides derived from the SARS S protein 13-Sep-04
�26-May-05
US20050112554 Characterization of the earliest stages of the severe acute respiratory 9-Jul-04
26-May-05 syndrome (SARS) virus and uses thereof HENG XU RUI 9-Jul-0426-May-05
i i i f i h i l l l i ctve ow molecular weight variants o angotensn converting enzyme 2 24-Jan-17
US10443049 A (Northwestern University 1115-Oct-19
24-Jan-18
(ACE2)
The United States of America, as 24-Feb-15
FS10301377 Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus immunogens, antibodies, Represented by the Secretary, 24-Feb-16
and their use Department of Health and Human 28-May-19
Services
Middle east respiratory syndrome coronavirus neutralizing antibodies and DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, 25-Apr-14
US10131704 p y y g(methods of use thereof INC. 27-Apr-1520-Nov-18
ANIMATE VALUE TM
Info@m-cam.com 513 E Main Street #2014 Charlottesville, VA 22902 T: 434.979•7240
1
Hawai'i General Plan re Proposed Changes in 2025 — Submission Number One (January
2025)
• Need to study plan's foundational topic(s) more inclusively —review scientific
dissent/dialogue for a more scientific approach and better informed choicest,
• Need to broaden the range of future scenario assumptions to include inventions
already in existence and patents that will no longer remain suppressed,
• Preconceived (but unstated) alliances and their premises apparently exist in this
plan, thus immediately narrowing the field of options under consideration: Is this
plan on the verge of becoming a WEF Great Reset clone, based/focused on, for
one example, prevalent terms like STAKEHOLDER, while neglecting to mention
the essential, fundamental notion of HOMEOWNER?If our Plan is going to ally
itself with an entity, let's make that choice transparent and let's choose one that
values humanity and freedom, not one that seeks to dominate and control.
Sherilyn Wells
Waikoloa Village
Submission Number One
January 2025
Climate change (natural climate variation) is and has always been real (reflect on
the mini Ice Age of a few centuries ago; reflect on the warning in the 1970's that
another such ice age was almost upon us2).
Recently,the term was narrowed by a small group of researchers to refer ONLY to
the human factor,based on these underlying assumptions -
• that there is a high level of anthropogenic/human influence on climate due to
burning fossil fuels,
• that that influence is uniformly negative,
• that global climate modeling can predict the future complexities of climate,
• that a continuation down that fossil fuel energy path is leading to disaster.
"The narrow and politicized framing of the climate change debate has resulted in an
oversimplification of the scientific problem and its solutions."
The three incontrovertible facts about global warming, as listed by Prof. Emeritus
Judith Curry:
Average global surface temperatures have overall increased since about 1860.
'https://iudithcM.com/blog-rules-and-netiguette/
2 On April 28, 1975,Newsweek published a provocative article,"The Cooling World,"in which writer and
science editor Peter Gwynne described a significant chilling of the world's climate,with evidence
accumulating"so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it."He raised the
possibility of shorter growing seasons and poor crop yields,famine,and shipping lanes blocked by ice,
perhaps to begin as soon as the mid-1980s.Meteorologists,he wrote,were"almost unanimous"in the
opinion that our planet was getting colder. Over the years that followed, Gwynne's article became one of
the most-cited stories in Newsweek's history.... Scores of similar articles,some with even more dire
predictions of a"little ice age"to come,appeared during the 1970s in such mainstream publications as
Time, Science Digest, The Los Angeles Times,Fortune, The Chicago Tribune,New York Magazine, The
New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor,Popular Science, and National Geographic.
2
Carbon dioxide has infrared emission spectra and thus acts to warm the planet.
Humans have been adding CO2 to the atmosphere by the emissions from burning of
fossil fuels.'
BUT....
1. De2ree of human influence on climate is not settled, however 4, despite dire
pronouncements prematurely posted (a)by a highly controlled media owned by agenda-
driven, vastly reduced (concentrated) ownership and (b)by editors of journals who curate
publications to favor only those studies expressing one particular viewpoint.
Judith Curry's five minutes of testimony to Commerce/Science/Transportation
subcommittee re SR253 —
https://x.com/TakingoutTrash7/status/1682911250437611521
This restriction on information via"official channels" is why a scientist who co-authored
the Hurricane Katrina study that was a major accelerant for the Climate Change
movement in 2005 now suggests publishing online, bypassing those journal-gatekeepers.
Publishing online allows for much broader peer review, often far superior in depth of
analysis and more nuanced observations, along with much greater transparency regarding
data sets and methodology.
"Science is a process of continuously evaluating the evidence, challenging our
assumptions, and critically reassessing our conclusions, rather than a collective of
decreed truths." Dr. Judith Curry
Rather than dismiss critics of her Hurricane Katrina study, which the Climate Change
community adored, Prof. Judith Curry took a deeper look at their criticisms and published
a thoughtful review entitled "Mixing Politics and Science in Testing the Hypothesis
That Greenhouse Warming Is Causing a Global Increase in Hurricane Intensity."s
'hLtps://www.youtube.com/results?search guely=stem-talk+podcast+ihmc+iudith+cM
4 hops://youtu.be/_2Bw52FjYi4
5 hops://ioumals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/87/8/bams-87-8-1025.xml
The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active and costly season on record.Recent publications
linking an increase in hurricane intensity to increasing tropical sea surface temperatures have fueled the
debate on whether or not global warming is causing an increase in hurricane intensity.Because of the
substantial implications of the hurricane—global warming issue for society and the immediate policy
relevance associated with decision making related to Hurricane Katrina,attacks and rebuttals related to this
research are being made in the media and on the World Wide Web without the rigor or accountability
expected of scientific discourse.In this paper,we aim to promote a balanced and thoughtful examination of
this subject by
• clarifying the debate surrounding the subject as to whether or not global warming is causing an
increase in global hurricane intensity,
• illustrating a methodology of hypothesis testing to address multiple criticisms of a complex
hypothesis that involves a causal chain,and
• providing a case study of the impact of politics,the media,and the World Wide Web on the
scientific process.
3
2. But then the shock of CLIMATEGATE, circa 2009, reverberated throughout the
climate change community. The revelation, due to an unauthorized release of
HADCRU emails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia(part
of the IPCC), that some researchers were manipulating climate data to make it appear the
earth was heating up dangerously, was a game-changer for ethical scientists who had
previously trusted the IPCC to present honest and accurate reports.
The emails revealed that a number of IPCC authors (1)had evaded FOIA requests for
data, (2)had cherry-picked data, (3) had manipulated the peer review process, (4) had
downplayed uncertainty, and (5)had otherwise attempted to squash and discredit
skeptics.
The IPCC had been funded to study/discover only negative, anthropogenic influences on
climate change, thus avoiding a comprehensive look at all influences and all results,
both positive and negative, which would have been the most scientific approach to the
topic. And Climategate was, apparently, one result of this narrow directive.
In the aftermath of Climategate, one scientist—Judith Curry —posted this commentary6
"ON THE CREDIBILITY OF CLIMATE RESEARCH" on Climate Audit, an award-
winning skeptics blog'. The Climate Audit site is worth reviewing, to read alternate
professional viewpoints on issues (the essence of what science is supposed to do—
discuss/debate in an arena where all information is welcomed, where all voices may be
heard).
Prof. Curry points to the need for the climate scientists to do better at making data
publicly available, to be completely transparent about their methods, to be honest about
uncertainties, and to be more respectful to scientists critical of the research.
"..two broader issues raised by these emails that are impeding the public
credibility of climate research: lack of transparency in climate data, and
"tribalism" in some segments of the climate research community that is
impeding peer review and the assessment process."
School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta,Georgia;National
Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder,Colorado
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Judith A.Curry,School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,Georgia
Institute of Technology,311 Ferst Drive,Atlanta.,GA 30332-0340,E-mail:cMiageas.gatech.edu
6 hops://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/
'hLtps://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcii&re/re/
4
Dr. Curry's entire commentary on the aftermath of CLIMATEGATE is posted at the end
of my testimony.
3. What global climate models can and can't do well:
Global climate models create a coarse grained simulation of earth's climate system
using computers. These models simulate atmosphere, ocean, land surface, sea ice, and
glaciers. Models use complex mathematical equations that can only be approximately
solved on computers.
Some of the equations and climate models are based on laws of physics.. However, there
are key processes in climate models that are approximated and not based on physical
laws. Hence, there are a LOT of"tunable parameters" in these climate models,
including solar direct effects and CLOUDS. Climate models can't tell us anything
about climate sensitivity to CO2g, but recent studies may be shedding more light on
CO2 saturation dynamics —
Two recently-published papers found that doubling COz in the atmosphere led to minimal
temperature increases. The calculated figures can be considered to be in margin of error territory and
on past observational evidence they pose no threat to the climate on Earth. They also destroy the shaky
scientific foundation upon which Net Zero rests.
Eight Taiwanese scientists led by Professor Peng-Sheng Wei found that the sensitivity of the
climate to a rise in COz atmospheric levels from 100 to 400 parts per million(ppm)was"negligibly
small" at 0.3°C. The paper is complex and examines heat transfers as a function of longitude,
latitude and altitude "as well as diffuse radiation determined by absorption bands based on
wavelength,temperature and the concentration or pressure of carbon dioxide vapour."
The rest of the article above is posted at the end of this testimony.
And there is still a factor of 3 uncertainty in these models, as per Dr. Curry.
In addition, the effect of our solar system transiting through a highly magnetized
interstellar cloud(which appears to be a factor in changes observed on ALL the
planets, as per extensive David Wilcock references on Gaiam to scientific articles)is
not included in these models -
https://web.archive.org/web/20230604143301/https://science.nasa.gov/science-
news/science-at-nasa/2009/23dec_voyager
Global models are exceedingly complex .. and are amazing tools for trying to understand
how global climate works, but are NOT fit for making future predictions, simulating
regional climates or extreme weather or climate events.
'https://www.youtube.coliVwatch?v=YHhV RY ac
https://mindandmatter.substack.com/p/judith-curry-climatology-climate
https://www.nickiikomes.com/post/Judith-curry-climatology-climate-change-computer-modelinggreen-
energy-greenhouse-gasses-84-1
5
The Global Warming Policy Foundation —Climate Models For The Layman
https://www.thegwpf.org > content> uploads > 2017 > 02 > Curry-2017.pdf
Global Warming Policy Foundation —2024 Annual GWTF Lecture(with
transcript)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=icisZV8i3OlE
The most important gaps in current understanding of climate change (Climate
Uncertainty and Risk by Judith A. Curry,page 8):
• Solar impacts on climate,including indirect effects beyond solar heating
• Multi-decadal and century-scale natural internal variability associated with
large-scale ocean circulations
• Mechanisms of vertical heat transfer in the ocean
• Fast thermodynamic feedbacks (water vapor, clouds, atmospheric lapse rate)
that determine the climate sensitivity to increases in atmospheric greenhouse
gases
• Earth's carbon budget and carbon cycle
• Ice sheet dynamics
• Geothermal heat transfer under the oceans and ice sheets
Disagreement—Causes of Recent Climate Change
Climate is generally stable/Change caused by external inputs
VERSUS
Climate is dynamic/Change primarily occurs naturally
E.G. Chart shows global sea level rise began around 1860,well before fossil carbon
emissions became significant
https://youtu.be/ 2Bw52FiYi4
6
There remains a factor of 3 uncertainty in the sensitivity of the climate to increasing
CO2. For radically reducing CO2 emissions to make any sense in terms of the
climate, the climate sensitivity of CO2 would need to be on the high end and natural
climate variability would need to be discounted. On the other hand,if the climate
7
sensitivity to increasing CO2 is on the low end and natural variability is dominant,
then decreasing CO2 emissions won't have much of a noticeable effect.
Further,we are unable to predict SOLAR VARIATIONS,volcanic eruptions, and
multidecadal oscillations, so there's a great deal of uncertainty in the model.
There's a key difference between a scientific consensus and a consensus of scientists:
Scientific consensus reflects our longstanding knowledge base about a topic about
which there is, essentially, no scientific disagreement(e.g., earth orbits the sun).
On the other hand, a consensus of scientists represents a deliberate expression of
collective judgment by a group of scientists on a poorly understood topic. This is
often at the official request of a government or organization, ergo will have political
overtones and pressures. See Dr.Judith Curry testimony to Congressional
subcommittee (link on page 1).
NEW ENERGY SOURCES
The Plan fails to account for emergence of energy systems that have nothing to do
with fossil fuels, that will moot the basis for the assertion of anthropogenic climate
change.
Working models of patents (such as anti-gravity vehicles) already exist, according to
U.S. Navy, in confirming Patent Office inquiries re whether to approve the patents
submitted by Salvatore Cezar Pais, a Romanian-American scientist.
In addition to the U.S. Navy/Salvatore Pais patents, there are thousands of suppressed
patents,including clean (free, anti-gravity,zero point, etc.) energy production and
propulsion systems and medical technology, many of which President Trump is
committed to releasing, as first indicated in his 2017 inaugural address9.
Although administrative agencies resisted his executive order and slowed the release of
such patents to a mere trickle during his first term, there is every reason to believe THIS
time the administrative response will be much livelier, far more in the public interest.
President Trump had better luck in his first term with the category of"mysteries of
space," as referenced in that address, when he oversaw the creation of Space Force.
See quote in footnote and the following screenshot.
9"We stand at the birth of a new millennium,ready to unlock the mysteries of space,to free the earth
from the miseries of disease,and to harness the energies,industries,and technologies of tomorrow."
8
Regarding patents for new energy options,propulsion, etc., with some working models
already in existence.
Listen to inventor Salvatore Cezar Pais (affiliated with U.S. Navy) on Curt Jaimungal's
Theory of Everything.
hlt2s://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E6QyAhTB3o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PE4C70I7Fr_&g t=0s
9
NEW STUDIES ON SATURATION OF CO2 AND ITS PLANETARY BENEFITS
Dramatic evidence has been published in a number of recent science papers that carbon dioxide levels are already
`saturated',meaning little or no further warming is to be expected and rising CO2 levels are all beneficial.
Half of human emissions are being quickly pushed back into the biosphere,the scientists say,causing substantial,
famine-busting plant growth, while the rest is entering a `saturated' atmosphere and having a minimal effect on
global temperatures. One of the papers accepting the human involvement in rising CO2 is published by the CO2
Coalition,which notes: "We like CO2,so should you."
None of this work will be reported in the mainstream since it disrupts a`settled'climate science narrative tied to the
political Net Zero fantasy. But the opinion that humans control the climate thermostat by releasing CO2, leading to
runaway temperatures, belongs to a dark period in science when it was captured to promote political aims.
10
However, work continues in skeptical climate circles to understand how a number of gases with warming
properties behave in a chaotic, non-linear atmosphere. Two recently-published papers found that doubling CO2 in
the atmosphere led to minimal temperature increases. The calculated figures can be considered to be in margin of
error territory and on past observational evidence they pose no threat to the climate on Earth. They also destroy
the shaky scientific foundation upon which Net Zero rests.
Eight Taiwanese scientists led by Professor Peng-Sheng Wei found that the sensitivity of the climate to a
rise in CO2 atmospheric levels from 100 to 400 parts per million(ppm)was"negligibly small" at 0.3°C.The
paper is complex and examines heat transfers as a function of longitude, latitude and altitude"as well as
diffuse radiation determined by absorption bands based on wavelength, temperature and the
concentration or pressure of carbon dioxide vapour."
What the scientists are looking at here is the narrow absorption bands within the infrared (IR) spectrum
that allow `greenhouse' gases to trap heat and warm the planet. Many argue that after a certain level the
gases `saturate' and lose most of their warming properties. One simple way to understand this is to
observe that doubling insulation in a loft will not trap twice as much heat.
The saturation hypothesis would appear to explain how CO2 has been 10-15 times higher in the past without
runaway temperatures,while the anthropogenic warming opinion does little more than provide scientific cover for a
dodgy but fashionable extreme eco scare.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change claims a climate sensitivity number based on doubling CO2
levels of around 3°C. But many climate models ramp up mass public hysteria by using`pathways'with much larger
and highly improbable estimates.The latter form the basis of numerous`scientists say'stories faithfully reported by
unquestioning mainstream media. The Taiwanese scientists found that ground temperature warming of 0.3°C
was associated with the increase from 100 ppm to 350 ppm and there was no additional warming at all as
CO2 rose further from 350 ppm to 400 ppm.The current level of CO2 in the atmosphere is 420 ppm.
Seven Austrian scientists have also recently concentrated on CO2 and the infrared spectrum, noting that a
future doubling of the gas up to 800 ppm "shows no increase in the IR absorption for the 15 u-central
peak". It is concluded that this can lead to 0.5°C warming at most. The scientists argue that climate
models and their CO2 influences should be revised. Much more experimental evidence about IR radiation
should be collected "before appointing current warming trends and climate change mechanisms
monocausal to greenhouse gas theories."
The recent papers on CO2 saturation are not the only ones to have been published lately. Earlier this year a
group of Polish scientists led by Dr.Jan Kubicki supplied three papers arguing that above 400 ppm, "the
CO2 concentration can no longer cause any increase in temperature." In 2023, three scientists including
Atmospheric Professor Yi Huang of McGill University stated that: "in the CO2 band centre is unchanged by
increased CO2 as the absorption is already saturated." In Chen et al. 20237 it is reported that CO2 had a
severely reduced warming effect past pre-industrial concentrations. It was also noted that water vapour
and cloud influences overlap and thus dominate absorption in the CO2 IR band. In 2022, the German
Physics Professor Dieter Schildnecht set the CO2 saturation level at must 300 ppm.
The CO2 Coalition is an educational foundation that says it provides facts, resources and information about the
"vital role" CO2 plays in the environment. It recently published a detailed paper that accepted humans had
contributed most of the CO2 that has entered the atmosphere in industrial times. The paper is sub-titled: "How
11
human emissions are restoring vital atmospheric CO2." The coalition has long promoted the role that saturation
plays in tempering the effect of a number of gases with warming properties. Attention is often drawn in its work to
the part played by water vapour that makes up around 4%of the atmosphere and contributes as much as 80%of
the Earth's vital warming. It saturates over large parts of the IR spectrum, reducing the effect of other gases in their
own specific bands. The coalition's board includes the distinguished Professor William Happer, who has long
argued the merits of the saturation hypothesis, and it was recently joined by the 2022 Nobel Physics Laureate Dr.
John Clauser.
Levels of CO2 have been much higher in the past, with evidence of vibrant animal and plant life. Many plants
evolved to thrive with higher levels than they feed on today, a period some scientists argue is one of CO2
denudation. In its recently published paper, the coalition observes that the higher the CO2 content in the
atmosphere,the greater the pressure from physical processes to drive CO2 into the oceans and vegetation.
This is borne out by considerable evidence, although the recent substantial `greening' of the planet is largely
hidden from readers reliant on mainstream media. In fact the new `green revolution' is feeding the world. The
authors of a recent science paper, Charles Taylor and Wolfram Schlenker, state: "We consistently find a large
fertilisation effect; a 1 ppm increase in CO2 equates to a 0.4%, 0.6%, 1% yield increase for corn, soybean and
wheat respectively." The heavy greening of the Earth can be seen in a map first published in Donohue/CSIRO
2015 and republished in another recent paper from the CO2 Coalition. This examined the nutritive value of plants
growing in enhanced CO2 concentrations.
The map was produced from satellite leaf data and shows that greening between 1982-2012 grew by 20-30% in
India, West Australia, the Sahel and the Anatolian highlands. A more recent paper Chen et al. 2024 found that
greening had actually accelerated in the last two decades. The increase in CO2 was found to be the dominant
driver of the positive trend of the Leaf Area Index over most of the global land surface.
Article author: Chris Morrison
Curry — On The Credibility Of Climate Research
Nov. 22, 2009
Having been riveted for the last few days by posts in the blogosphere on the HADCRU
hack and the increasing attention being given to this by the mainstream media, I would
12
like to provide an "external but insider" assessment and perspective. My perspective is as
a climate researcher that is not involved directly in any of the controversies and issues in
the purloined HADCRU emails, but as one that is familiar with this research, the
surrounding controversies, and many of the individuals who sent these emails. While the
blogosphere has identified many emails that allegedly indicate malfeasance, clarifications
especially from Gavin Schmidt have been very helpful in providing explanations and the
appropriate context for these emails. However, even if the hacked emails from HADCRU
end up to be much ado about nothing in the context of any actual misfeasance that
impacts the climate data records, the damage to the public credibility of climate
research is likely to be significant. In my opinion,there are two broader issues
raised by these emails that are impeding the public credibility of climate research:
lack of transparency in climate data, and "tribalism" in some segments of the
climate research community that is impeding peer review and the assessment
process.
1. Transparency. Climate data needs to be publicly available and well documented. This
includes metadata that explains how the data were treated and manipulated, what
assumptions were made in assembling the data sets, and what data was omitted and why.
This would seem to be an obvious and simple requirement, but the need for such
transparency has only been voiced recently as the policy relevance of climate data has
increased. The HADCRU surface climate dataset and the paleoclimate dataset that has
gone into the various "hockeystick" analyses stand out as lacking such transparency.
Much of the paleoclimate data and metadata has become available only because of
continued public pressure from Steve McIntyre. Datasets that were processed and
developed decades ago and that are now regarded as essential elements of the climate
data record often contain elements whose raw data or metadata were not preserved (this
appears to be the case with HADCRUT). The HADCRU surface climate dataset needs
public documentation that details the time period and location of individual station
measurements used in the data set, statistical adjustments to the data, how the data were
analyzed to produce the climatology, and what measurements were omitted and why. If
these data and metadata are unavailable, I would argue that the data set needs to be
reprocessed(presumably the original raw data is available from the original sources).
Climate data sets should be regularly reprocessed as new data becomes available and
analysis methods improve. There are a number of aspects of the surface climate record
that need to be understood better. For example, the surface temperature bump ca. 1940
needs to be sorted out, and I am personally lacking confidence in how this period is being
treated in the HADCRUT analysis. In summary, given the growing policy relevance of
climate data, increasingly higher standards must be applied to the transparency and
availability of climate data and metadata. These standards should be clarified, applied and
enforced by the relevant national funding agencies and professional societies that publish
scientific journals.
2. Climate tribalism. Tribalism is defined here as a strong identity that separates one's
group from members of another group, characterized by strong in-group loyalty and
regarding other groups differing from the tribe's defining characteristics as inferior. In
the context of scientific research, tribes differ from groups of colleagues that collaborate
and otherwise associate with each other professionally. As a result of the politicization of
climate science, climate tribes (consisting of a small number of climate researchers)were
13
established in response to the politically motivated climate disinformation machine that
was associated with e.g. ExxonMobil, CEI, Inhofe/Morano etc. The reaction of the
climate tribes to the political assault has been to circle the wagons and point the guns
outward in an attempt to discredit misinformation from politicized advocacy groups. The
motivation of scientists in the pro AGW tribes appears to be less about politics and more
about professional ego and scientific integrity as their research was under assault for
nonscientific reasons (I'm sure there are individual exceptions, but this is my overall
perception). I became adopted into a"tribe" during Autumn 2005 after publication of the
Webster et al. hurricane and global warming paper. I and my colleagues were totally
bewildered and overwhelmed by the assault we found ourselves under, and associating
with a tribe where others were more experienced and savvy about how to deal with this
was a relief and very helpful at the time.
After becoming more knowledgeable about the politics of climate change (both the
external politics and the internal politics within the climate field),I became
concerned about some of the tribes pointing their guns inward at other climate
researchers who question their research or don't pass various loyalty tests. I even
started spending time at climateaudit, and my public congratulations to Steve
McIntyre when climateaudit won the "best science blog award" was greeted with a
rather unpleasant email from one of the tribal members. While the "hurricane wars"
fizzled out in less than a year as the scientists recovered from the external assault and got
back to business as usual in terms of arguing science with their colleagues, the"hockey
wars" have continued apparently unabated. With the publication of the IPCC 4th
Assessment report, the Nobel Peace Prize, and energy legislation near the top of the
national legislative agenda, the"denialists" were becoming increasingly irrelevant(the
Heartland Conference and NIPCC are not exactly household words). Hence it is difficult
to understand the continued circling of the wagons by some climate researchers with guns
pointed at skeptical researchers by apparently trying to withhold data and other
information of relevance to published research, thwart the peer review process, and keep
papers out of assessment reports. Scientists are of course human, and short-term
emotional responses to attacks and adversity are to be expected, but I am particularly
concerned by this apparent systematic and continuing behavior from scientists that hold
editorial positions, serve on important boards and committees and participate in the major
assessment reports. It is these issues revealed in the HADCRU emails that concern me
the most, and it seems difficult to spin many of the emails related to FOIA, peer review,
and the assessment process. I sincerely hope that these emails do not in actuality reflect
what they appear to, and I encourage Gavin Schmidt et al. to continue explaining the
individual emails and the broader issues of concern.
In summary, the problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed
by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks
against climate science are now being used against other climate researchers and the
more technical blogs (e.g. Climateaudit, Lucia, etc). Particularly on a topic of such great
public relevance, scientists need to consider carefully skeptical arguments and either
rebut them or learn from them. Trying to suppress them or discredit the skeptical
researcher or blogger is not an ethical strategy and one that will backfire in the long run. I
have some sympathy for Phil Jones' concern of not wanting to lose control of his
personal research agenda by having to take the time to respond to all the queries and
14
requests regarding his dataset, but the receipt of large amounts of public funding pretty
much obligates CRU to respond to these requests. The number of such requests would be
drastically diminished if all relevant and available data and metadata were made publicly
accessible, and if requests from Steve McIntyre were honored(I assume that many
spurious requests have been made to support Steve McIntyre's request, and these would
all disappear).
The HADCRU hack has substantially increased the relevance of Climateaudit, WUWT,
etc. The quickest way for HADCRU et al. to put Climateaudit and the rest of this tribe
out of business is make all climate data and metadata public and make every effort to
improve the datasets based on all feedback that you receive. Do this and they will quickly
run out of steam and become irrelevant . Gavin Schmidt's current efforts at
realclimate are a good step in the right direction of increasing transparency.
But the broader issue is the need to increase the public credibility of climate science. This
requires publicly available data and metadata, a rigorous peer review process, and
responding to arguments raised by skeptics. The integrity of individual scientists that are
in positions of responsibility (e.g. administrators at major research institutions, editorial
boards, major committees, and assessments) is particularly important for the public
credibility of climate science. The need for public credibility and transparency has
dramatically increased in recent years as the policy relevance of climate research has
increased. The climate research enterprise has not yet adapted to this need, and our
institutions need to strategize to respond to this need.
https://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/
1
Sherilyn Wells March 2025 testimony on the proposed 2045 Plan, supplement to January
2025 testimony.
Many people have already offered expert testimony and very perceptive criticism of this
Plan.
Rather than repeat their observations, for this second submission I have chosen to go
beneath the surface, to reveal the nature of the underlying system, the organizations and
people, that appear to be the engine behind many, if not all, of the Plan concepts.
Let's bring everything into the light: "The phrase "sunlight is the best disinfectant"
is a well-known quote by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis,which he used
metaphorically to emphasize the importance of transparency and openness in
society and governance."
L RESPONSE REQUIRED as per HRS §226-109(9)—page 2
II. ARE YOU PREPARED TO ADDRESS ONE VERY REAL (SUPER
WEALTHY) ISSUE?—page 3
III. PRO FORMA vs. REALLY INCORPORATING TESTIMONY—HOW WILL
THIS PROCESS END?—page 3
IV. HALT THE SLIDE INTO A "WEF GREAT RESET CLONE" PLAN—page 4
V. DR DAVID MARTIN ON TRIGGERS USED TO CALL FOR THE GREAT
RESET—page 5
VI. PYRAMID—page 5
VIL USING CRISES—page 6
VIIL WHERE'S HOMEOWNER? —page 6
IX. HAPPINESS,PROPERTY,AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT—page 7
X. PROPERTY AND PERSONHOOD BY MARGARET JANE RADIN—page 8
XI. CONNECTING STAKEHOLDERS TO COVID/CRISIS (WEF)—page 8
XIL WEF: COVID WAS A LITMUS TEST FOR"STAKEHOLDER
CAPITALISM"—page 9
XIIL DR DAVID MARTIN'S RESEARCH—page 9
XIV. THE COVID ORCHESTRA INCLUDES WEF—NAMING NAMES. page 11
2
XV. MEDIA OWNERSHIP DICTATES CONTENT (Manipulation System
Mouthpiece—MSM)—page 12
XVL PHILANTHROPY.. or is it? PUBLIC RETENTION OF POWER. -page 14
XVII. ARTFUL LANGUAGE ON BEHALF OF DECEPTION—page 14
XVIII. LIFE EXPERIENCE —page 14
XIX. Hawai'i General Plan re Proposed Changes in 2025 — Submission Number
One (January 2025)—page 15
XX. Article -Editor of major newspaper says he planted stories for CIA—page 28
XXI. Article -Dr. David Martin Exposes the Names and Faces of the People Who
Are Killing Humanity; Red Pill Expo,November 19,2021 —page 31
XXIL Article - TRANSCRIPT Of Dr David E. Martin's Speech At The European
Union Parliament, Covid Summit,MAY 2023—page 39
XXIII. Article -Breaking The WEF Matrix: How To Resist The Great Reset-page
45
L RESPONSE REQUIRED as per HRS §226-109(9)
I am including my January testimony again re the requirement, as per HRS §226-109
(9) (a statute cited in the Plan), for a response to this new information on the topic of
climate change.
HRS §226-109(9) -Use management and implementation approaches that
encourage the continual collection, evaluation, and integration of new information
and strategies into new and existing practices,policies, and plans; and
• The 2045 Plan language does not reflect the broader, more scientific nature of
comprehensive (not limited to alleged anthropogenic) climate change studies, as
well as noting where there are uncertainties or deficiencies in the data and
conclusions.
• It does not reflect where there is professional dissent(reminiscent of the
censorship/exclusion of professional Covid dissent at the beginning).
• It does not address studies that show positive effects from increasing CO2.
• The Plan does not address the missing elements and inabilities of climate change
modeling systems.
• The Plan does not address the emergence of new energy systems, already
patented, awaiting sufficient political support for their release, systems that will
NOT introduce greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Relevant terms like Zero
Point and Free Energy, etc., are nowhere in the Plan.
3
II. ARE YOU PREPARED TO ADDRESS ONE VERY REAL (SUPER
WEALTHY) ISSUE?
Given the great transfer of wealth during Covidi, from the lower and middle class into a
growing group of(existing and)newly created super wealthy...
Where is the REAL (no holds barred) discussion re robust, community-driven solutions
to -
• address affordability and availability of housing ownership when wealthy
corporations/individuals buy up properties well above market value,putting
home ownership even further out of reach for the "average" local resident
and significantly altering the property taxes of surrounding homeowners (a
backdoor approach to gradually, financially forcing them out, too?) -PAGE
181 —Housing Challenges;
• a discussion about how to protect the integrity and the"fabric" of communities
when local businesses who have been a part of the community, some for
decades or longer, are suddenly closed down after wealthy
corporations/individuals buy up the land beneath them;
• a discussion about how much disproportionate influence we can then expect
these super wealthy "stakeholders" to have on our community development and
planning processes, including via their public/private projects (see who
comprises the WEF Great Reset stakeholders in footnote 3 —hint—it's NOT the
average person). And take the verb "improving" (quote below)with a huge grain
of salt...
"One of the stated aims of the WEF is that it will be "...committed to
improving the state of the world through public private cooperation."
https:Hthe2eopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-2reat-reset/
CONCLUSION:
MISSING from the plan: this issue of the SUPER WEALTHY and their impact on
our island, our ohana, our community. More below on the need for private/public
partnership transparency at the inception of any process.
III. PRO FORMA vs. REALLY INCORPORATING TESTIMONY—HOW WILL
THIS PROCESS END?
I've attended many meetings where it was clear that hearings were "pro forma," done for
the purpose of fulfilling a legal or statutory requirement, but without any intention of
actually reflecting on, of incorporating or integrating, any testimony that goes contrary to
the plan that's already been chosen behind closed doors.
Donna Thompson of Waimea, whose excellent testimony I herein incorporate via
reference, has made similar observations.
'https://totalnews.com/another-massive-transfer-of-wealth-incoming/
4
IV. HALT THE SLIDE INTO A "WEF GREAT RESET CLONE" PLAN
You can still step back from this slippery slope and HALT THE SLIDE towards the
ultimate result of creating, in "2045," a WEF-Great-Reset-like plan (Agenda 21, as
per Ms. Thompson), but it may well require refusing to let this island's backroom
power players have their way and empowering the people instead.
In June 2019, the WEF signed a Strategic Partnership Framework agreement
with the United Nations. The WEF and the UN agreed to collaboratively
"accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development:
milestones to complete the UN's plan for the 20 century, also known as Agenda
21 —the UN's vision for a centrally managed global society. The policies
required to achieve these sustainable development goals (SDGs) are developed by
the multi-stakeholder partnership. httys://yfsma2azine.com/2023/07/30/wef-
resist-the-treat-reset
Even in the face of growing widespread opposition, governments are
pursuing WEF's strategy as it is no secret that the international organisation
has managed to infiltrate them through its Young Global Leaders.
httys:Hthe2eopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-2reat-reset/
In his book, Kahn explores subverting democracy by training a certain group in
society as potential leaders, with those pre-selected few groomed for power being
able to define what our shared values as a society should be. Sound familiar?
Today's World Economic Forum's Young Global Leader scheme is the exact
manifestation of his original proposal. In essence,they will hold all the cards,
whilst the common people will be left with illusory pseudo-democratic
processes,poverty, and constant absurd psycholo2ical operations (PSYOPs)
to sow chaos and distract us all unceasingly.
htti)s:Hvfsma2azine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-2reat-reset
Sidenote—one of my Waimea friends recently asked the Mayor if this plan will
go forward regardless of all the citizen opposition and the Mayor's reply was
that we DON'T have to adopt the 2045 Plan.. (Now THERE's a concept.)
Just remember—WEF's oh-so-well-crafted rhetoric (the velvet glove) seldom
matches their intended outcome (the iron fist inside the glove).2 Focus group research
and decades of mind control research by our government and universities give these elite
groups "pathways into persuasion" that don't have to reflect reality.
2 Breaking The WEF Matrix:How To Resist The Great Reset-
httn://Yfsma2azine.com/2023/07/30/Wef-resist-the-treat-reset/
The WEF and the Great Reset by Wasif Chaudry
hILtp://thegeopolily.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-great-reset/
5
1. Velvet glove— Covid concerns.
2. Velvet glove— climate change* concerns (*the erroneous WEF-type— see my
January testimony about a more comprehensive and scientific approach).
3. Iron fist—control over the public.
SMART city —Surveilling the Masses And Restricting Transactions (thanks to China for
showing us the reality, within a"SMART" city, of consequences for failure to follow
prescribed social actions).
V. DR DAVID MARTIN ON TRIGGERS USED TO CALL FOR THE GREAT
RESET
Refer to Dr. David Martin's research and information, included below, in which he
presents the evidence for WEF's disingenuous history with Covid and the
experimental injection (which they secretly co-participated in creating,then used as
a rationale for launching their Great Reset).
WEF is NOW using "climate change" as the new, post-Covid driver to impose their
control agenda.
Notice how much the deliberately limited, non-comprehensive,WEF version of
"climate change" is used in this 2045 plan.Why use something so flawed, unless it
was in service to an agenda, ergo NOT a commitment to best available science?
See my January testimony for a more science-based consideration of climate change.
VI. PYRAMID
Therefore, this plan is a pyramid attempting to look like a level playing field, in which
the pyramid's capstone will be a small cadre of"stakeholders"' (WEF term, used 86
3 "A global network of stakeholder capitalist partners are collaborating to usher in
what they claim to be a new model of enhanced democratic accountability that includes
"civil society." Continued...
However, beneath their deceptive use of the term civil society lies an ideology which
offers this network an unprecedented degree of political control that threatens to
extinguish representative democracy entirely.
"What is further obfuscated is that civil society stakeholders are selected.
"Representatives from NGOs, religious communities, unions, and philanthropic
foundations are the selected stakeholders whose only role is to agree with the
policies placed on the table by the public-private partnership," Davis adds. Their
consent is deemed your consent. http://yfsmagazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-
great-reset
6
times in the proposed plan) and many of the goals (and omissions) look remarkably
similar to the WEF Great Reset. For instance, observe this Plan-consultant's profile:
Consultants, Page 2; Page 86, footnote 3 — SMART GROWTH AMERICA
Smart Growth America focuses on three specific priorities: Climate change and
resilience, advancing racial equity, and creating healthy communities.
hit2s://smartgrowthamerica.org/our-work/
Great Reset— a glob ali st-driven initiative to establish Schwab's vision
of stakeholder capitalism,where corporations are positioned as "trustees of
society" to address the world's economic and social woes.
hllps://yfsmagazine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-great-reset
Therefore, it is important to now address WEF as the background basis for 2045's
characteristics, in the hopes that the 2045 planners might want to seriously reconsider
whether taking cues— covertly - from WEF is truly in the best interests of the people of
this island, this state.
And here's why...
VIL USING CRISES
Unfortunately, WEF history is typically that of pursuing more centralized control of
and power over the individual, the public, regardless of deceptive rhetoric claiming
otherwise.
The opportunistic use and/or deliberate creation of"crises"4 are a common tool for
expanding control (see WEF articles on taking advantage of Covid to advance
stakeholder capitalism).
A more sinister aspect of the WEF/Covid connection is revealed by Dr. David Martin's
research, which will be referenced below(see also Footnote 4).
VIIL WHERE'S HOMEOWNER?
WEF's 2018 Predictions for 2030: "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy."5
4Dr.David Martin:Who"They"Are,"The Names and Faces"-Dr.David Martin Exposes the
Names and Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/11/20/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-names-and-faces
Dr. David Martin reveals Fauci's Trail of Covid Patents' since 2002 (includes additional links to
source documents)
hilps://www.algora.com/Algom blog/2021/07/12/breaking-news-patents-filed-in-america-as-far-back-as-
2002-cone erring-sars-cov-2-coronavirus
Dr.David Martin's Covid Bioweapon Speech at'An Injection of Truth'Town Hall Held March 3/25
in Calgary,Alberta
hilps://rumble.com/v6g6rt2-dr-david-martin-caIgM.htm
WEF article(ah,the irony if you've read Dr.David Martin's evidence) -A New York simulation
showed we weren't prepared for coronavirus.But it's not too late to act
hops://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/03/covid-19-coronavirus-new-york-simulation-lessons-not-too-late-
to-act/
7
It is telling that THE TERM "STAKEHOLDER" IN THE 2045 PLAN'S
GLOSSARY DOES NOT EXPLICITLY INCLUDE HOMEOWNER, nor do we
find HOMEOWNER elsewhere in the document. In litigation citing a statute or
code,the deliberate absence of a term is considered dispositive.
In this plan, there are:
EIGHTY-SIX (86) matches for STAKEHOLDER.
ZERO (0) matches for HOMEOWNER(although Homeownership does show up
twice).
There are also NO matches for SELF SUFFICIENT, which is a cornerstone of how
people are better able to weather change and maintain their freedom and personal
power. Coincidence?
Freedom is the greatest fruit of self-sufficiency.
Epicurus
IX. HAPPINESS,PROPERTY,AND PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT
This article reviews the WEF's 2018 prediction for 2030 - "You'll own nothing.And
you'll be happy" - and finds property ownership to be a cornerstone of personal
happiness.
A future with no individual ownership is not a happy one:Property theory
shows why.
httys://www.s ciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/SO016328723001131
The greatest fine art of the future will be the making of a comfortable living
from a small piece of land.
Abraham Lincoln
Notice that "..the pursuit of happiness"was considered a self-evident truth and
unalienable RIGHT,important enough by the founders of this nation to be
mentioned in the preamble of one of our country's foundational documents.
Therefore, happiness of the people is an important benchmark indicating "success"
as further development of our island communities takes place.
"You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy." This prediction, based on just one of
eight made by the World Economic Forum's (WEF) network of Global Future
Councils (Parker, 2016), assumed this expression in a video produced by the
WEF in November 2016. As a tool intended to disseminate its content, the video
s "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy"is a phrase from 2018 predictions for 2030 published by the
World Economic Forum,cited as being based on input from members of the World Economic Forum
Global Futures Councils,likely in turn based on a 2016 article in which Danish Social Democrat Ida Auken
outlines her vision of the future.
8
was published both to the WEF's own website4 and its Facebookpage,s and was
then shared across other media platforms...
Very few of the comments6 could be characterised as being in any sense positive
toward the prediction.
After the WEF announced its `Great Reset'agenda to the world in June 2020
(Schwab, 2020 ,) reaction to the prediction became stronger and louder still.
COVID-19 was identified as the principal reason for pursuing the agenda, but
the WEF claimed that it also addressed the "...climate and social crises"
emerging even before the pandemic's onset(Schwab, 2020).
A diverse cross-section of concerned citizenry across the world was, however,
having none of it.
httys://www.s ciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/SO016328723001131
X. PROPERTY AND PERSONHOOD BY MARGARET JANE RADIN
Margaret Jane Radin is known for her influential article "Property and
Personhood," which was published in the Stanford Law Review in 1982.
This article has been cited over 700 times and has been recognized as one of the 100
most cited law review articles of all time.
In this article, Radin argues that individuals require secure control over certain
aspects of their external environment in the form of property rights to achieve
proper self-development or personhood.
She also discusses how property rights for personhood serve as a justification for
property rights in general and for some current schemes of property entitlement.
In the article Professor Radin makes a compelling case that proper self-
development, or personhood, requires individuals to have secure control over
certain things—e.g., one's home residence—in their external environment in the
form of property rights.
httys://www.research2ate.net/publication/45457879 Property and Personhood Re
visited
XI. CONNECTING STAKEHOLDERS TO COVID/CRISIS (WEF)
The changes we have already seen in response to COVID-19 prove that a reset
of our economic and social foundations is possible.
This is our best chance to instigate stakeholder capitalism-and here's how it
can be achieved.
hops://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/06/now-is-the-time-for-a-great-reset/
9
XII. WEF: COVID WAS A LITMUS TEST FOR"STAKEHOLDER
CAPITALISM"
According to WEF, Covid 19 is a litmus test for stakeholder capitalism-with
remotely tracking people and remote teaching lauded by WEF as great examples of
how a company can meet that stakeholder capitalism goal.
hllps://www.weforum.org/stories/2020/03/covid-19-is-a-litmus-test-for-stakeholder-
capitalism/
By contrast, other companies used profits to invest in digital transformation,
talent, research and development, and their customer relations. That now gives
them an ability to react that other companies lack. Microsoft,for example,
ranked first in JUST Capital's stakeholder companies rankin,-, is a collaborator
on Johns Hopkins'coronavirus tracker, and is providing teachers with access
and training for its Teams program to teach remotely. It can do so because of
its business model, but also because its stakeholders expect it to step up at times
such as these.
XIIL DR DAVID MARTIN'S RESEARCH
Dr. David Martin was able, thanks to his remarkable CV and decades of investigative
work for the government, to track patents and the history of Covid.
6 Dr. David Martin is the founding CEO of M-CAM Inc. M-CAM is the international leader in intellectual property-
based financial risk management. From auditing patent quality for governments and patent offices,to providing
state-of-the-art actuarial risk management systems and solutions to the largest banks and insurance companies,
M-CAM has established a global standard in patent quality and commercial validity assessment and management.
A spokesperson for global intellectual property accountability and quality reform, Dr. Martin has worked closely
with the United States Congress, numerous trade and finance regulatory agencies in the United States, Europe
and Asia, in advocating and deploying infrastructure to support growing reliance on proprietary rights in business
transactions. M-CAM has supported the modernization of intellectual property,tax, and accounting laws through its
work with oversight agencies and policy makers.
Dr. Martin has founded several for-profit and non-profit companies and organizations and serves of several boards.
He was the founding CEO of Mosaic Technologies Inc.,a company that developed and commercialized advanced
computational linguistics technologies,dynamic data compression and encryption technologies,electrical field
transmission technology, medical diagnostics, and stealth/anechoic technology. He was a founding member of
Japan's Institute for Interface Science&Technology. He founded and served as Executive Director of the
Charlottesville Venture Group. He has served as a board member for the Research Institute for Small and
Emerging Business(Washington D.C.),the Academy for Augmenting Grassroots Technological Innovations
(India),the IST(Japan)the Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Commerce (Virginia), and the Charlottesville
Industrial Development Agency(Virginia).
As former Assistant Professor at the University of Virginia's School of Medicine, Dr. Martin founded the University's
first wholly-owned,for-profit, research and development and technology transfer corporation. Engaged in domestic
and international technology transfer, clinical research, and financing,this company pioneered new techniques
innovation management that have become industry standards. In 1999, Dr. Martin was appointed by the Governor
of the Commonwealth of Virginia to serve on the Joint Commission on Technology and Science and has served
the General Assembly and Virginia's Center for Innovative Technology on numerous occasions.
Dr. Martin's work with the Batten Institute at the Darden Graduate School of Business Administration at the
University of Virginia and his related work at the Indian Institute for Management in Ahmedabad India has brought
unprecedented curricular focus to areas of intangible asset risk management,finance,and accounting standards.
In addition to his academic work, Dr. Martin has closely advised intellectual property based finance and investment
programs in India, China, Denmark,the European Union,the United Kingdom, South Africa,the Islamic Republic
of Iran,the United States, and the United Arab Emirates.
10
See attached document- 20200403_SARS_CoV_Patent Corpus_Lit_Review.pdf.
The perpetrators' (including WEF) shocking willingness to inflict harm via the Covid
experience (see Dr. David Martin's Red Pill Expo, November 19, 2021, talk in the video
link) is in utter/complete antagonism to Hawai'i's values of ALOHA, as described in the
state statute.$ And remember, WEF used Covid to trot out The Great Reset, which this
2045 Plan emulates.
As Dr. Martin points out, if any of his facts are false, he could be sued. And no one has...
The following quote should be a massive wakeup call to the public re those behind the
unleashing of Covid and the experimental injections:
Dr. Martin has publications in law, medicine,engineering,finance and education. He maintains active research in
the fields of linguistic genomics,fractal financial risk modeling,as well as continuing his over 15 years of research
in cellular membrane ionic signaling.
https://www.wipo.int/meetings/en/2006/scp of ge 06/speakers/martin.html
https://www.m-cam.com/about-us/
7 Dr.David Martin:Who"They"Are,"The Names and Faces"-Dr.David Martin Exposes the
Names and Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity
hops://www.algora.com/Algom btog/2021/11/20/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-names-and-faces
Dr. David Martin reveals Fauci's Trail of Covid Patents' since 2002 (includes additional links to
source documents)
hops://www.algora.com/Algom blog/2021/07/12/breaking-news-patents-filed-in-america-as-far-back-as-
2002-cone erring-sars-cov-2-coronavirus
Dr.David Martin's Covid Bioweapon Speech at'An Injection of Truth'Town Hall Held March 3/25
in Calgary,Alberta
hLtps://rumble.com/v6g6rt2-dr-david-martin-caIgm.htm
Dr.David E.Martin PhD.—Covid Summit—European Union Parliament May 2023
hops://rumb le.com/v2ncp8w-dr-david-e.-martin-phd-covid-summit-europe an-union-parliament-ma-
2023.html
'hLtps://www.hawaii.edu/uhwo/clear/home/lawaloha.html
§5-7.5"Aloha Spirit".(a) "Aloha Spirit"is the coordination of mind and heart within each person.It
brings each person to the self.Each person must think and emote good feelings to others.In the
contemplation and presence of the life force, "Aloha",the following unuhi laula loa may be used:
"Akahai",meaning kindness to be expressed with tenderness;
"Lokahi",meaning unity,to be expressed with harmony;
"`Olu`olu"meaning agreeable,to be expressed with pleasantness;
"Ha`aha`a",meaning humility,to be expressed with modesty;
"Ahmmi",meaning patience,to be expressed with perseverance.
These are traits of character that express the charm,warmth and sincerity of Hawaii's people.It was the
working philosophy of native Hawaiians and was presented as a gift to the people of Hawaii. "Aloha"is
more than a word of greeting or farewell or a salutation. "Aloha"means mutual regard and affection and
extends warmth in caring with no obligation in return. "Aloha"is the essence of relationships in which each
person is important to every other person for collective existence."Aloha"means to hear what is not said,
to see what cannot be seen and to know the unknowable.
(b)In exercising their power on behalf of the people and in fulfillment of their responsibilities,
obligations and service to the people,the legislature,governor,lieutenant governor,executive officers of
each department,the chief justice,associate justices,and judges of the appellate,circuit,and district courts
may contemplate and reside with the life force and give consideration to the"Aloha Spirit". [L 1986,c 202,
§ 11
11
"So .. the fact of the matter is, they actually stated in 2014 that this was about
investors responding if they see profit at the end of the process."
Dr. David Martin I National Citizens Inquiry Canada I March 6th 2025
Edmonton, Alberta
hllps://rumble.com/v6gds3o-national-citizens-inquiry-with-dr.-david-martin-
march-6th-2025-edmonton-alb.html?e9s=src vl ucp
Dr. Martin was also invited to speak at the European Union Parliament's Covid Summit
in 2023. https://rumble.com/v2ncp8w-dr-david-e.-martin-phd-covid-summit-european-
union-parliament-may-2023.html
XIV. THE COVID ORCHESTRA INCLUDES WEF—NAMING NAMES
Dr. Martin refers to the major players orchestrating the plandemic as The Covid
Orchestra, his research having proved that it was accurate to designate Covid and the
experimental injection as a planned event(plandemic).
Even in the face of growing widespread opposition, governments are
pursuing WEF's strategy as it is no secret that the international organisation
has managed to infiltrate them through its Young Global Leaders.
https:Hthe2eopolity.com/2023/01/26/the-wef-and-the-2reat-reset/
The full article, summarizing Dr. Martin's Red Pill Expo speech and identifying the
organizations, as well as the people, involved in creating the plandemic, is reproduced at
the bottom of this testimony. In the meantime, notice that WEF is represented FOUR
TIMES in the "Covid Orchestra" of major players.
Excerpt from Dr. David Martin's speech at the Red Pill Expo:
THE COVID ORCHESTRA
"But this, Ladies and Gentlemen is the slide you wanted to see. This is actually
the names and faces of the people who are, in fact killing humanity. And that's
ALL of them. ...Let's make sure that we don't ever forget the names and the
faces of the people who decided to kill us..."
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe,Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees WEF
Klaus Schwab,Founder and Executive Chairman,WEF
Marc Benioff, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce,WEF Trustee,
WEF Yount Global Leader
Luis Alberto Moreno,WEF Young Global Leader
(Sherilyn the remainder of the Orchestra list is at the end of this testimony,
where the full article -about the extensive origins of/patents associated with
Covid and the experimental injection - is reprinted).
As Dr. Martin points out, if any of his facts are false, he could be sued. And no one has...
12
This list is a horrifying indictment, but words alone cannot begin to impress upon us the
true/ultimate consequences of following any plan mapped out, in part, by such an
organization.
SO... let's personalize what happened to humanity as a result of that trigger for THE
GREAT RESET (Great Reset being a role model this plan is following).
Start by watching these links, a testament to the death and damage unleashed on
humanity via all those companies and people named by Dr. David Martin.
FOLLOW THE SILENCED
https://followthesilenced.com/
"the filmmakers uncovered a larger story behind a successful campaign to conceal the true scope
of injuries from these vaccines"
WITNESS STATEMENT
hllps://rumble.com/v6px9fk-witness-statement-australian-documentary-biggest-crime-in-
human-history-i an.html?e9s=rel_v22r
Japan's most senior cancer doctor: COVID shots are `essentially murder'
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/j ilpans-most-senior-cancer-doctor-covid-shots-are-
essentially-murder/
Dr. Michael Goodkin -Letter to HHS Secretary RFK Jr.: `I Urge You to Act Now.
Expose the Corruption.'
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/mi chael-goodkin-letter-hhs-secretary-rfk-j r-
expose-corruption/
XV. MEDIA OWNERSHIP DICTATES CONTENT (Manipulation System
Mouthpiece—MSM)
I add this part because, while we're looking at this WEF role model, the WEF also
stressed what THEY called misinformation in the obstacles to getting their Great Reset
underway.
Of course, what they called misinformation proved to be accurate information... it just
did not support their WEF-control agenda.
Complicit media, whose ownership is now concentrated in six companies9, come in
handy for the power brokers to narrow information available to the public in order
to create a preferred public response. That is just as true here in Hawai'i as elsewhere.
Cooperation with/involvement/infiltration of the intelligence agencies is also common.
William B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer, in his testimony before the
Senate Intelligence Committee, said:
"There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don't need to
manipulate Time magazine, for example,because there are [Central
Intelligence] Agency people at the management level."
And then there's Project Mockingbird (see Church Committee testimony and report).
9 https://www.webfx.com/blov,/intemet/the-6-companies-that-own-almost-all-media-infoyrUhic/
13
German journalist Udo Ulfkotte authored a confessional titled Presstitutes Embedded
In The Pay Of The CIA, further proving that the CIA's Project Mockingbird infiltration
of mainstream media is still "alive and well."
Udo also mentions George Soros (who is affiliated with WEF and is a regular
speaker at their DAVOS meetings).
So when you see SOROS/OPEN SOCIETY, also think WEF. When it says
"American" in the next excerpt, Udo means CIA.
Udo: "Those dismissive of the role of the financier George Soros will be
interested to learn of the prominence the Soros backed European Council of
Foreign Relations plays in policy formation, something U aotte experienced first
hand...how Soros was part and parcel of the political regime in Germany, and
essential to efforts expanding American hegemony in Eastern and Central
Europe.
Udo Ulfkotte, deceased German journalist and author of the confessional,
Presstitutes Embedded In The Pay Of The CIA.
https://www.theburkean.ie/articles/2020/09/20/udo-ulfkotte-was-a-nationalist-
j oumalist-murdered-in-_eg rmany
This next article, based on leaked internal documents (CCDH),poses a powerful
question about censorship. Once again, notice the Soros connection,intelligence
agencies, etc.
Are U.S. Taxpayers Funding `Corrupt Dark-money Network' That Censored CHD,
RFK Jr. and Others?
A new analysis of government spending shows that several U.S. taxpayer funded
organizations are linked to the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
Last year, reporting by Thacker and Matt Taibbi, based on internal documents
leaked by CCDH insiders, revealed that CCDH planned to"kill" X, shut down
popular social media accounts on other platforms, censor non-establishment
voices and "brine back" attacks on "antivaxx" voices, among other things.
According to the documents, CCDH planned to organize "black ops" against
Kennedy, who was a U.S. presidential candidate at the time. The group also
planned to pressure Substack to remove COVID-19 vaccine critics Mercola
and Alex Berenson from its platform.
A subsequent investigation_ by Ji traced some of the organizations that financially
support CCDH, including several U.K.-based nonprofits affiliated with legacy
media organizations, the U.K. government and major philanthropic
organizations such as the Open Society Foundations (Soros) and the Ford
Foundation.
14
"These hidden contributions reveal a coordinated pipeline of financial influence
involving U.S. intelligence-adjacent entities, UK Crown interests, and Soros-
backed organizations like the Tides Foundation," Ji wrote.
hllps://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/us-taxpayer-funds-ccdh-dark-money-
censorship-rfk-j r-chd/
XVI. PHILANTHROPY.. or is it? PUBLIC RETENTION OF POWER.
A power/control chess move is often disguised as philanthropy, too (just look at Bill
Gates as one example, whose philanthropy "somehow" seemed to routinely/exponentially
increase his personal wealth—vaccine stocks bought, then sold, with remarkably
prescient timing— and to increase his influence— GAVI, WHO).
SO—public/private partnerships MUST be transparent,projects required to be
revealed at the inception of the process and examined VERY closely to ensure that
NO such transfer of power away from the citizens is taking place as quid pro quolo.
***How this public retention of power might be achieved is another topic worthy of
soliciting deeper community input/solutions.***
XVII. ARTFUL LANGUAGE ON BEHALF OF DECEPTION
The language employed by plans following in the footsteps of the Great Reset(whose
ultimate, albeit hidden,purpose is to reduce choice/freedom) may adeptly hide the true
intent, thanks in part to (1) focus group research to learn which phrases are most
persuasive for the general public and (2) decades of mind control experimentation (e.g.,
Monarch, MKUltra, etc.), as revealed by whistleblowers like Cathy O'Brien (Access
Denied For Reasons Of National Security; The Tranceformation of America).
XVIIL LIFE EXPERIENCE
I have been -
• a former public interest environmental litigator(including in favor of growth
management),
• a former co-president of the Washington Environmental Council who helped craft
legislative language for amendments to the state statute RCW 36.70A,
• a former Board member of the Washington Toxics Coalition,
• a co-founder of and reporter for a local newspaper that didn't depend on external
agents for its funding (ergo was not obligated to slant the news in favor of any
particular monied entity),
10 Cambridge Dictionary: something that you give to someone in return for them giving
something back to you:
a quid pro quo -It's all legal as long as contributions aren't a quid pro quo for political
favors.
15
• a co-founder of a local environmental organization (Watershed Defense Fund,
which became the Clean Water Alliance),
• a former candidate for countywide public office (Democrat, although the office
itself was non-partisan),
• a speaker within the educational system on both (1) issues of the day and (2)
active citizenship,
• a mother/grandmother whose stake in a positive future is thus both personal as
well as societal,
• a relative of people (1)who covertly worked for the CIA and (2)who were high-
security-clearance law enforcement on an international border(and who
witnessed the corruption within our system, too), and
• I was raised in countries which did not enjoy even the appearance of a democratic
process, so my appreciation for a constitutional republic and genuine, accurate
elections` (`which we do NOT yet have in Hawai'i —lots of evidence on that
topic!) is amplified.
XIX. Hawai'i General Plan re Proposed Changes in 2025 — Submission Number
One (January 2025)
• Need to study plan's foundational topic(s) more inclusively —review scientific
dissent/dialogue for a more scientific approach and better informed choicesii
• Need to broaden the range of future scenario assumptions to include inventions
already in existence and patents that will no longer remain suppressed,
• Preconceived(but unstated) alliances and their premises apparently exist in this
plan, thus immediately narrowing the field of options under consideration: Is this
plan on the verge of becoming a WEF Great Reset clone, based/focused on, for
one example,prevalent terms like STAKEHOLDER, while neglecting to mention
the essential, fundamental notion of HOMEOWNER? If our Plan is going to ally
itself with an entity, let's make that choice transparent and let's choose one that
values humanity and freedom, not one that seeks to dominate and control.
Sherilyn Wells
Submission Number One
January 2025
Climate change (natural climate variation)is and has always been real (reflect on
the mini Ice Age of a few centuries ago; reflect on the warning in the 1970's that
another such ice age was almost upon us12).
"https://iudithcM.com/blog-rules-and-netiguette/
12 On April 28, 1975,Newsweek published a provocative article,"The Cooling World,"in which writer and
science editor Peter Gwynne described a significant chilling of the world's climate,with evidence
accumulating"so massively that meteorologists are hard-pressed to keep up with it."He raised the
possibility of shorter growing seasons and poor crop yields,famine,and shipping lanes blocked by ice,
perhaps to begin as soon as the mid-1980s.Meteorologists,he wrote,were"almost unanimous"in the
opinion that our planet was getting colder. Over the years that followed, Gwynne's article became one of
the most-cited stories in Newsweek's history.... Scores of similar articles,some with even more dire
16
Recently, the term was narrowed by a small group of researchers to refer ONLY to
the human factor, based on these underlying assumptions -
• that there is a high level of anthropogenic/human influence on climate due to
burning fossil fuels,
• that that influence is uniformly negative,
• that global climate modeling can predict the future complexities of climate,
• that a continuation down that fossil fuel energy path is leading to disaster.
"The narrow and politicized framing of the climate change debate has resulted in an
oversimplification of the scientific problem and its solutions."
The three incontrovertible facts about global warming, as listed by Prof. Emeritus
Judith Curry:
Average global surface temperatures have overall increased since about 1860.
Carbon dioxide has infrared emission spectra and thus acts to warm the planet.
Humans have been adding CO2 to the atmosphere by the emissions from burning of
fossil fuels.13
BUT....
1. De2ree of human influence on climate is not settled, however 14, despite dire
pronouncements prematurely posted (a)by a highly controlled media owned by agenda-
driven, vastly reduced (concentrated) ownership and(b)by editors of journals who curate
publications to favor only those studies expressing one particular viewpoint.
Judith Curry's five minutes of testimony to Commerce/Science/Transportation
subcommittee re SR253 —
https://x.com/TakingoutTrash7/status/1682911250437611521
This restriction on information via "official channels" is why a scientist who co-
authored the Hurricane Katrina study that was a major accelerant for the Climate
Change movement in 2005 now suggests publishing online, bypassing those
journal-gatekeepers. Publishing online allows for much broader peer review,
often far superior in depth of analysis and more nuanced observations, along
with much greater transparency regarding data sets and methodology.
"Science is a process of continuously evaluating the evidence, challenging our
assumptions, and critically reassessing our conclusions, rather than a collective
of decreed truths." Dr. Judith Curry
Rather than dismiss critics of her Hurricane Katrina study, which the Climate
Change community adored, Prof. Judith Curry took a deeper look at their
criticisms and published a thoughtful review entitled "Mixing Politics and
predictions of a"little ice age"to come,appeared during the 1970s in such mainstream publications as
Time, Science Digest, The Los Angeles Times, Fortune, The Chicago Tribune,New York Magazine, The
New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor Popular Science, and National Geographic.
�s https://www.youtube.coliVresults?search guerv=stem-talk+podcast+ilu-nc+iudith+cuLry
is https://Youtu.be/_2Bw52FiYi4
17
Science in Testing the Hypothesis That Greenhouse Warming Is Causing a
Global Increase in Hurricane Intensity."15
2. But then the shock of CLIMATEGATE, circa 2009, reverberated throughout the
climate change community. The revelation, due to an unauthorized release of
HADCRU emails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia(part
of the IPCC), that some researchers were manipulating climate data to make it appear the
earth was heating up dangerously, was a game-changer for ethical scientists who had
previously trusted the IPCC to present honest and accurate reports.
The emails revealed that a number of IPCC authors (1)had evaded FOIA requests for
data, (2) had cherry-picked data, (3) had manipulated the peer review process, (4) had
downplayed uncertainty, and(5) had otherwise attempted to squash and discredit
skeptics.
The IPCC had been funded to study/discover only negative, anthropogenic influences on
climate change, thus avoiding a comprehensive look at all influences and all results,
both positive and negative, which would have been the most scientific approach to the
topic. And Climategate was, apparently, one result of this narrow directive.
In the aftermath of Climategate, one scientist—Judith Curry —posted this commentary16
"ON THE CREDIBILITY OF CLIMATE RESEARCH" on Climate Audit, an award-
winning skeptics blog". The Climate Audit site is worth reviewing, to read alternate
professional viewpoints on issues (the essence of what science is supposed to do—
discuss/debate in an arena where all information is welcomed, where all voices may be
heard).
15 hLtps://ioumals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/bams/87/8/bams-87-8-1025.xml
The 2005 Atlantic hurricane season was the most active and costly season on record.Recent publications
linking an increase in hurricane intensity to increasing tropical sea surface temperatures have fueled the
debate on whether or not global warming is causing an increase in hurricane intensity.Because of the
substantial implications of the hurricane—global warming issue for society and the immediate policy
relevance associated with decision making related to Hurricane Katrina,attacks and rebuttals related to this
research are being made in the media and on the World Wide Web without the rigor or accountability
expected of scientific discourse.In this paper,we aim to promote a balanced and thoughtful examination of
this subject by
• clarifying the debate surrounding the subject as to whether or not global warming is causing an
increase in global hurricane intensity,
• illustrating a methodology of hypothesis testing to address multiple criticisms of a complex
hypothesis that involves a causal chain,and
• providing a case study of the impact of politics,the media,and the World Wide Web on the
scientific process.
School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,Georgia Institute of Technology,Atlanta,Georgia;National
Center for Atmospheric Research,Boulder,Colorado
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: Judith A.Curry,School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences,Georgia
Institute of Technology,311 Ferst Drive,Atlanta,GA 30332-0340,E-mail:cMiageas.gatech.edu
16 hilps://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/
"hLtps://climateaudit.org/author/stevemcii&re/re/
18
4Ythe'007
web[o
award
winner
best science blog
Prof. Curry points to the need for the climate scientists to do better at making data
publicly available, to be completely transparent about their methods, to be honest about
uncertainties, and to be more respectful to scientists critical of the research.
"..two broader issues raised by these emails that are impeding the public
credibility of climate research: lack of transparency in climate data, and
"tribalism" in some segments of the climate research community that is
impeding peer review and the assessment process."
Dr. Curry's entire commentary on the aftermath of CLIMATEGATE is posted at the end
of my testimony.
3. What global climate models can and can't do well:
Global climate models create a coarse grained simulation of earth's climate system
using computers. These models simulate atmosphere, ocean, land surface, sea ice, and
glaciers. Models use complex mathematical equations that can only be aproximately
solved on computers.
Some of the equations and climate models are based on laws of physics.. However, there
are key processes in climate models that are aproximated and not based on physical
laws. Hence, there are a LOT of"tunable parameters" in these climate models,
including solar direct effects and CLOUDS. Climate models can't tell us anything
about climate sensitivity to CO218,but recent studies may be shedding more light on
CO2 saturation dynamics —
Two recently-published papers found that doubling CO2 in the atmosphere led to minimal
temperature increases. The calculated figures can be considered to be in margin of error territory and
on past observational evidence they pose no threat to the climate on Earth.They also destroy the shaky
scientific foundation upon which Net Zero rests.
Eight Taiwanese scientists led by Professor Peng-Sheng Wei found that the sensitivity of the
climate to a rise in CO2 atmospheric levels from 100 to 400 parts per million(ppm)was"negligibly
small" at 0.3°C. The paper is complex and examines heat transfers as a function of longitude,
latitude and altitude "as well as diffuse radiation determined by absorption bands based on
wavelength,temperature and the concentration or pressure of carbon dioxide vapour."
18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHhV_RY ac
https://mindandmatter.sub stack.com/p/judith-curry-climato to gy-climate
hLtps://www.nickjikomes.coM/post/judith-curry-climatology-climate-change-computer-modeling-green-
energy-greenhouse-gasses-84-1
19
The rest of the article above is posted at the end of this testimony.
And there is still a factor of 3 uncertainty in these models, as per Dr. Curry.
In addition, the effect of our solar system transiting through a highly magnetized
interstellar cloud (which appears to be a factor in changes observed on ALL the
planets, as per extensive David Wilcock references on Gaiam to scientific articles) is
not included in these models -
https://web.archive.org/web/20230604143301/hLtps://science.nasa.gov/science-
news/science-at-nasa/2009/23dec_vo tiger
Global models are exceedingly complex .. and are amazing tools for trying to understand
how global climate works, but are NOT fit for making future predictions, simulating
regional climates or extreme weather or climate events.
The Global Warming Policy Foundation—Climate Models For The Layman
hllps://www.thegwpf.org > content> uploads > 2017 > 02 > Curry-2017.pdf
Global Warming Policy Foundation—2024 Annual GWTF Lecture (with
transcript)
httys://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iasZV8i3OlE
The most important gaps in current understanding of climate change Climate
Uncertainty and Risk by Judith A. Curry,page 8):
• Solar impacts on climate,including indirect effects beyond solar heating
• Multi-decadal and century-scale natural internal variability associated with
large-scale ocean circulations
• Mechanisms of vertical heat transfer in the ocean
• Fast thermodynamic feedbacks (water vapor, clouds, atmospheric lapse rate)
that determine the climate sensitivity to increases in atmospheric greenhouse
gases
• Earth's carbon budget and carbon cycle
• Ice sheet dynamics
• Geothermal heat transfer under the oceans and ice sheets
Disagreement—Causes of Recent Climate Change
Climate is generally stable/Change caused by external inputs
VERSUS
Climate is dynamic/Change primarily occurs naturally
E.G. Chart shows global sea level rise began around 1860,well before fossil carbon
emissions became significant
httys://youtu.be/ 2Bw52FiYi4
20
200
'Ange,-Ornate change Men;torr
ai kNu
shift in r:
50 t, ) ..►
0
0 tw W.
so
4 ocx)
-100
-150
levreleva t al 12014)
18000 law tow 11150 2000
Y�r
• Global sea level rise started -1860, well before
' fossil carbon emissions became significant
wwjQq gw,4 w •l Iraq[oil w
I
Climate is generally stable Climate is dynamic
Change caused by external inputs Change primarily occurs naturally
'r rnary cliniale F, ,'f �� complex dyn al system
"control knob' • No ,nnpie cause and effect
• CO., warming is amplified by • Climate shifts naturally in
known factors unexpected ways.
• Key driver: large-scale ocean
• circulations and changes in
cloudiness
There remains a factor of 3 uncertainty in the sensitivity of the climate to increasing
CO2. For radically reducing CO2 emissions to make any sense in terms of the
climate, the climate sensitivity of CO2 would need to be on the high end and natural
climate variability would need to be discounted. On the other hand,if the climate
21
sensitivity to increasing CO2 is on the low end and natural variability is dominant,
then decreasing CO2 emissions won't have much of a noticeable effect.
Further,we are unable to predict SOLAR VARIATIONS,volcanic eruptions, and
multidecadal oscillations, so there's a great deal of uncertainty in the model.
There's a key difference between a scientific consensus and a consensus of scientists:
Scientific consensus reflects our longstanding knowledge base about a topic about
which there is, essentially, no scientific disagreement(e.g., earth orbits the sun).
On the other hand, a consensus of scientists represents a deliberate expression of
collective judgment by a group of scientists on a poorly understood topic. This is
often at the official request of a government or organization, ergo will have political
overtones and pressures. See Dr.Judith Curry testimony to Congressional
subcommittee (link on page 1).
NEW ENERGY SOURCES
The Plan fails to account for emergence of energy systems that have nothing to do
with fossil fuels, that will moot the basis for the assertion of anthropogenic climate
change.
Working models of patents (such as anti-gravity vehicles) already exist, according to
U.S. Navy, in confirming Patent Office inquiries re whether to approve the patents
submitted by Salvatore Cezar Pais, a Romanian-American scientist.
In addition to the U.S. Navy/Salvatore Pais patents, there are thousands of suppressed
patents,including clean (free, anti-gravity,zero point, etc.) energy production and
propulsion systems and medical technology, many of which President Trump is
committed to releasing, as first indicated in his 2017 inaugural address19
Although administrative agencies resisted his executive order and slowed the release of
such patents to a mere trickle during his first term, there is every reason to believe THIS
time the administrative response will be much livelier, far more in the public interest.
President Trump had better luck in his first term with the category of"mysteries of
space," as referenced in that address, when he oversaw the creation of Space Force.
See quote in footnote and the following screenshot.
19"We stand at the birth of a new millennium,ready to unlock the mysteries of space,to free the earth
from the miseries of disease,and to harness the energies,industries,and technologies of tomorrow."
22
M �
1riS71,Y'II rr,M.At N1I+-,, an.9N w«Riy.N,r.x+r.
Rr,
•Ir�rW rlRRrwr Nf ipra^ilNl VIANIMC 11Y�'y TMMI
1 hr«r� a r"'I,'b er*k h"x t x 6aa l 9 10 ad
ARRI«Vrr««y dmces <--
04M tsmrvrc Arurc r.M•
� 'QMrt.An«�eaJ' "wu.+rt��trueai l A�L"i h^�gv.o�r«r'ra.Yaw<�r idr�ws t1ae�;mn:�.S'.n�Wk�,e'1rw 7V
6 Olds u««rCM«'.'aorr�r..lrer ly«c�ezrera9 kYr�r 4�f p,Jrr«.r .Yucae�r«,a u.�
C��aGI«�«l4f1�«�«i r i^�� `t�-`• t' r t rrr .,�
.,�.w.�, r.q�,.�,a �..-,...a r„ .,.,,.� `°�nd'r.kA•aur. ���ar'k6mr ��a+y rc�•rt�m.ih�+W n�i`�a'a�,r�
Regarding patents for new energy options,propulsion, etc., with some working models
already in existence.
Listen to inventor Salvatore Cezar Pais (affiliated with U.S. Navy) on Curt Jaimungal's
Theory of Everything.
hlt2s://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5E6QyAhTB3o
h—ttps://www.voutube.com/watch?v=PE4C7017Fr &t=0s
PAN
THE �r
PHYSICS
OF UFOs y�
sahratort F.w. u.t:
t
Gravity,URP Patents, Pats «�
r+ r N
ra
a �
a
d V f
1
H,«rrrG�,nl�
23
ell-
Ah
iz
r ,
NEW STUDIES ON SATURATION OF CO2 AND ITS PLANETARY BENEFITS
Dramatic evidence has been published in a number of recent science papers that carbon dioxide levels are already
`saturated',meaning little or no further warming is to be expected and rising CO2 levels are all beneficial.
Half of human emissions are being quickly pushed back into the biosphere,the scientists say,causing substantial,
famine-busting plant growth, while the rest is entering a `saturated' atmosphere and having a minimal effect on
global temperatures. One of the papers accepting the human involvement in rising CO2 is published by the CO2
Coalition,which notes: "We like CO2,so should you."
None of this work will be reported in the mainstream since it disrupts a`settled'climate science narrative tied to the
political Net Zero fantasy. But the opinion that humans control the climate thermostat by releasing CO2, leading to
runaway temperatures, belongs to a dark period in science when it was captured to promote political aims.
24
However, work continues in skeptical climate circles to understand how a number of gases with warming
properties behave in a chaotic, non-linear atmosphere. Two recently-published papers found that doubling CO2 in
the atmosphere led to minimal temperature increases. The calculated figures can be considered to be in margin of
error territory and on past observational evidence they pose no threat to the climate on Earth. They also destroy
the shaky scientific foundation upon which Net Zero rests.
Eight Taiwanese scientists led by Professor Peng-Sheng Wei found that the sensitivity of the climate to a
rise in CO2 atmospheric levels from 100 to 400 parts per million(ppm)was"negligibly small" at 0.3°C.The
paper is complex and examines heat transfers as a function of longitude, latitude and altitude"as well as
diffuse radiation determined by absorption bands based on wavelength, temperature and the
concentration or pressure of carbon dioxide vapour."
What the scientists are looking at here is the narrow absorption bands within the infrared (IR) spectrum
that allow `greenhouse' gases to trap heat and warm the planet. Many argue that after a certain level the
gases `saturate' and lose most of their warming properties. One simple way to understand this is to
observe that doubling insulation in a loft will not trap twice as much heat.
The saturation hypothesis would appear to explain how CO2 has been 10-15 times higher in the past without
runaway temperatures,while the anthropogenic warming opinion does little more than provide scientific cover for a
dodgy but fashionable extreme eco scare.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change claims a climate sensitivity number based on doubling CO2
levels of around 3°C. But many climate models ramp up mass public hysteria by using`pathways'with much larger
and highly improbable estimates. The latter form the basis of numerous`scientists say'stories faithfully reported by
unquestioning mainstream media. The Taiwanese scientists found that ground temperature warming of 0.3°C
was associated with the increase from 100 ppm to 350 ppm and there was no additional warming at all as
CO2 rose further from 350 ppm to 400 ppm.The current level of CO2 in the atmosphere is 420 ppm.
Seven Austrian scientists have also recently concentrated on CO2 and the infrared spectrum, noting that a
future doubling of the gas up to 800 ppm "shows no increase in the IR absorption for the 15 u-central
peak". It is concluded that this can lead to 0.5°C warming at most. The scientists argue that climate
models and their CO2 influences should be revised. Much more experimental evidence about IR radiation
should be collected "before appointing current warming trends and climate change mechanisms
monocausal to greenhouse gas theories."
The recent papers on CO2 saturation are not the only ones to have been published lately. Earlier this year a
group of Polish scientists led by Dr.Jan Kubicki supplied three papers arguing that above 400 ppm, "the
CO2 concentration can no longer cause any increase in temperature." In 2023, three scientists including
Atmospheric Professor Yi Huang of McGill University stated that: "in the CO2 band centre is unchanged by
increased CO2 as the absorption is already saturated." In Chen et al. 20237 it is reported that CO2 had a
severely reduced warming effect past pre-industrial concentrations. It was also noted that water vapour
and cloud influences overlap and thus dominate absorption in the CO2 IR band. In 2022, the German
Physics Professor Dieter Schildnecht set the CO2 saturation level at must 300 ppm.
The CO2 Coalition is an educational foundation that says it provides facts, resources and information about the
"vital role" CO2 plays in the environment. It recently published a detailed paper that accepted humans had
contributed most of the CO2 that has entered the atmosphere in industrial times. The paper is sub-titled: "How
25
human emissions are restoring vital atmospheric CO2." The coalition has long promoted the role that saturation
plays in tempering the effect of a number of gases with warming properties. Attention is often drawn in its work to
the part played by water vapour that makes up around 4%of the atmosphere and contributes as much as 80%of
the Earth's vital warming. It saturates over large parts of the IR spectrum, reducing the effect of other gases in their
own specific bands. The coalition's board includes the distinguished Professor William Happer, who has long
argued the merits of the saturation hypothesis, and it was recently joined by the 2022 Nobel Physics Laureate Dr.
John Clauser.
Levels of CO2 have been much higher in the past, with evidence of vibrant animal and plant life. Many plants
evolved to thrive with higher levels than they feed on today, a period some scientists argue is one of CO2
denudation. In its recently published paper, the coalition observes that the higher the CO2 content in the
atmosphere,the greater the pressure from physical processes to drive CO2 into the oceans and vegetation.
This is borne out by considerable evidence, although the recent substantial `greening' of the planet is largely
hidden from readers reliant on mainstream media. In fact the new `green revolution' is feeding the world. The
authors of a recent science paper, Charles Taylor and Wolfram Schlenker, state: "We consistently find a large
fertilisation effect; a 1 ppm increase in CO2 equates to a 0.4%, 0.6%, 1% yield increase for corn, soybean and
wheat respectively." The heavy greening of the Earth can be seen in a map first published in Donohue/CSIRO
2015 and republished in another recent paper from the CO2 Coalition. This examined the nutritive value of plants
growing in enhanced CO2 concentrations.
Deserts 'greening' from rising CO2
W ` -
10%
p
10% v d
20% a
The map was produced from satellite leaf data and shows that greening between 1982-2012 grew by 20-30% in
India, West Australia, the Sahel and the Anatolian highlands. A more recent paper Chen et al. 2024 found that
greening had actually accelerated in the last two decades. The increase in CO2 was found to be the dominant
driver of the positive trend of the Leaf Area Index over most of the global land surface.
Article author: Chris Morrison
Curry — On The Credibility Of Climate Research
Nov. 22, 2009
Having been riveted for the last few days by posts in the blogosphere on the HADCRU
hack and the increasing attention being given to this by the mainstream media, I would
26
like to provide an "external but insider" assessment and perspective. My perspective is as
a climate researcher that is not involved directly in any of the controversies and issues in
the purloined HADCRU emails, but as one that is familiar with this research, the
surrounding controversies, and many of the individuals who sent these emails. While the
blogosphere has identified many emails that allegedly indicate malfeasance, clarifications
especially from Gavin Schmidt have been very helpful in providing explanations and the
appropriate context for these emails. However, even if the hacked emails from HADCRU
end up to be much ado about nothing in the context of any actual misfeasance that
impacts the climate data records, the damage to the public credibility of climate
research is likely to be significant. In my opinion,there are two broader issues
raised by these emails that are impeding the public credibility of climate research:
lack of transparency in climate data, and "tribalism" in some segments of the
climate research community that is impeding peer review and the assessment
process.
1. Transparency. Climate data needs to be publicly available and well documented. This
includes metadata that explains how the data were treated and manipulated, what
assumptions were made in assembling the data sets, and what data was omitted and why.
This would seem to be an obvious and simple requirement, but the need for such
transparency has only been voiced recently as the policy relevance of climate data has
increased. The HADCRU surface climate dataset and the paleoclimate dataset that has
gone into the various "hockeystick" analyses stand out as lacking such transparency.
Much of the paleoclimate data and metadata has become available only because of
continued public pressure from Steve McIntyre. Datasets that were processed and
developed decades ago and that are now regarded as essential elements of the climate
data record often contain elements whose raw data or metadata were not preserved (this
appears to be the case with HADCRUT). The HADCRU surface climate dataset needs
public documentation that details the time period and location of individual station
measurements used in the data set, statistical adjustments to the data, how the data were
analyzed to produce the climatology, and what measurements were omitted and why. If
these data and metadata are unavailable, I would argue that the data set needs to be
reprocessed(presumably the original raw data is available from the original sources).
Climate data sets should be regularly reprocessed as new data becomes available and
analysis methods improve. There are a number of aspects of the surface climate record
that need to be understood better. For example, the surface temperature bump ca. 1940
needs to be sorted out, and I am personally lacking confidence in how this period is being
treated in the HADCRUT analysis. In summary, given the growing policy relevance of
climate data, increasingly higher standards must be applied to the transparency and
availability of climate data and metadata. These standards should be clarified, applied and
enforced by the relevant national funding agencies and professional societies that publish
scientific journals.
2. Climate tribalism. Tribalism is defined here as a strong identity that separates one's
group from members of another group, characterized by strong in-group loyalty and
regarding other groups differing from the tribe's defining characteristics as inferior. In
the context of scientific research, tribes differ from groups of colleagues that collaborate
and otherwise associate with each other professionally. As a result of the politicization of
climate science, climate tribes (consisting of a small number of climate researchers)were
27
established in response to the politically motivated climate disinformation machine that
was associated with e.g. ExxonMobil, CEI, Inhofe/Morano etc. The reaction of the
climate tribes to the political assault has been to circle the wagons and point the guns
outward in an attempt to discredit misinformation from politicized advocacy groups. The
motivation of scientists in the pro AGW tribes appears to be less about politics and more
about professional ego and scientific integrity as their research was under assault for
nonscientific reasons (I'm sure there are individual exceptions, but this is my overall
perception). I became adopted into a"tribe" during Autumn 2005 after publication of the
Webster et al. hurricane and global warming paper. I and my colleagues were totally
bewildered and overwhelmed by the assault we found ourselves under, and associating
with a tribe where others were more experienced and savvy about how to deal with this
was a relief and very helpful at the time.
After becoming more knowledgeable about the politics of climate change (both the
external politics and the internal politics within the climate field),I became
concerned about some of the tribes pointing their guns inward at other climate
researchers who question their research or don't pass various loyalty tests. I even
started spending time at climateaudit, and my public congratulations to Steve
McIntyre when climateaudit won the "best science blog award" was greeted with a
rather unpleasant email from one of the tribal members. While the "hurricane wars"
fizzled out in less than a year as the scientists recovered from the external assault and got
back to business as usual in terms of arguing science with their colleagues, the"hockey
wars" have continued apparently unabated. With the publication of the IPCC 4th
Assessment report, the Nobel Peace Prize, and energy legislation near the top of the
national legislative agenda, the"denialists" were becoming increasingly irrelevant(the
Heartland Conference and NIPCC are not exactly household words). Hence it is difficult
to understand the continued circling of the wagons by some climate researchers with guns
pointed at skeptical researchers by apparently trying to withhold data and other
information of relevance to published research, thwart the peer review process, and keep
papers out of assessment reports. Scientists are of course human, and short-term
emotional responses to attacks and adversity are to be expected, but I am particularly
concerned by this apparent systematic and continuing behavior from scientists that hold
editorial positions, serve on important boards and committees and participate in the major
assessment reports. It is these issues revealed in the HADCRU emails that concern me
the most, and it seems difficult to spin many of the emails related to FOIA, peer review,
and the assessment process. I sincerely hope that these emails do not in actuality reflect
what they appear to, and I encourage Gavin Schmidt et al. to continue explaining the
individual emails and the broader issues of concern.
In summary, the problem seems to be that the circling of the wagons strategy developed
by small groups of climate researchers in response to the politically motivated attacks
against climate science are now being used against other climate researchers and the
more technical blogs (e.g. Climateaudit, Lucia, etc). Particularly on a topic of such great
public relevance, scientists need to consider carefully skeptical arguments and either
rebut them or learn from them. Trying to suppress them or discredit the skeptical
researcher or blogger is not an ethical strategy and one that will backfire in the long run. I
have some sympathy for Phil Jones' concern of not wanting to lose control of his
personal research agenda by having to take the time to respond to all the queries and
28
requests regarding his dataset, but the receipt of large amounts of public funding pretty
much obligates CRU to respond to these requests. The number of such requests would be
drastically diminished if all relevant and available data and metadata were made publicly
accessible, and if requests from Steve McIntyre were honored(I assume that many
spurious requests have been made to support Steve McIntyre's request, and these would
all disappear).
The HADCRU hack has substantially increased the relevance of Climateaudit, WUWT,
etc. The quickest way for HADCRU et al. to put Climateaudit and the rest of this tribe
out of business is make all climate data and metadata public and make every effort to
improve the datasets based on all feedback that you receive. Do this and they will quickly
run out of steam and become irrelevant . Gavin Schmidt's current efforts at
realclimate are a good step in the right direction of increasing transparency.
But the broader issue is the need to increase the public credibility of climate science. This
requires publicly available data and metadata, a rigorous peer review process, and
responding to arguments raised by skeptics. The integrity of individual scientists that are
in positions of responsibility (e.g. administrators at major research institutions, editorial
boards, major committees, and assessments) is particularly important for the public
credibility of climate science. The need for public credibility and transparency has
dramatically increased in recent years as the policy relevance of climate research has
increased. The climate research enterprise has not yet adapted to this need, and our
institutions need to strategize to respond to this need.
hrips://climateaudit.org/2009/11/22/curry-on-the-credibility-of-climate-research/
XX. Editor of major newspaper says he planted stories for CIA
hlt 2s://www.di gitali oumal.com/world/editor-of-maj or-german-newspaper-saw
planted-stori es-for-ci a/arti cle/424470
By Ralph Lopez
Published
January 26, 2015
Saying he believes a medical condition gives him only a few years to live, and that he is
filled with remorse, Dr. Udo Ulfkotte, the editor of Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, one
of Germany's largest newspapers, said in an interview that he allegedly accepted news
stories written and given to him by the CIA and published them under his own
name. Ulfkotte said he gathered the aim of much of the deception was to drive
nations toward war.
Dr. Ulfkotte says the corruption of journalists and major news outlets by the CIA is
routine, accepted, and widespread in the western media, and that journalists who do
not comply either cannot get jobs at any news organization, or find their careers cut short.
Dr. Ulfkotte is the author of a book currently available only in German, `Bought
Journalists" (Kopp 2014. —now available in the U.S. as Presstitutes Embedded In The
29
Pay Of The CIA.) Aged 55, he was also once an advisor to the government of German
Chancellor Helmet Kohl.
Among the stories Ulfkotte says he was ordered to plant in his newspaper over the years
was a story that Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi was building poison gas factories in
2011. Ulfkotte also claims he was an eyewitness to Saddam Hussein's use of poison gas
against Iranians in the war between Iran and Iraq, but that the editors he worked for at the
time were not interested, because Iraq was a US ally at the time.
It should be noted his allegations have not been corroborated by a third party.
Ulfkotte says he is better positioned to come forward than many journalists because
he does not have children who could be threatened. Ulfkotte told the Russian
newspaper Russian Insider(RI):
"When I told the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (Ulfkotte's newspaper)that I would
publish the book, their lawyers sent me a letter threatening with all legal consequences if
I would publish any names or secrets —but I don't mind. You see, I don't have children to
take care of. And you must know I was severely injured during the gas attack I
witnessed in Iran in 1988. I'm the sole German survivor from a German poison gas
attack. I'm still suffering from this. I've had three heart attacks. I don't expect to
live for more than a few years."
Ulfkotte says that remorse of having "lied" to mass audiences over the years drove
him to come forward. He told RI that he was:
"taught to lie, to betray and not to tell the truth to the public."
Ulfkotte says:
"I'm ashamed I was part of it. Unfortunately I cannot reverse this."
Among the admissions that Ulfkotte makes in the interview are putting his own name to
articles completely written by intelligence agencies. He said:
"I ended up publishing articles under my own name written by agents of the CIA
and other intelligence services, especially the German secret service."
Ulfkotte detailed the pattern of cajolery and outright bribery used by the CIA and
other US-allied intelligence agencies, for the purpose of advancing political agendas.
Ulfkotte said:
"once you're connected, you make friends with selected Americans. You think they are
your friends and you start cooperating. They work on your ego, make you feel like you're
important. And one day one of them will ask you `Will you do me this favor'..."
30
Ulfkotte noted that a journalists on international press trips paid for by organizations
close to the government are unlikely to submit a storyline not favorable to the sponsor.
Dr. Udo Ulfkotte
hungarytoday.hu
Of the gassing of Iranians he had witnessed in the Eighties, Ulfkotte said:
"they asked me to hand over the photos that I had made to the German association of
chemical companies in Frankfurt, Verband der Chemischen Industrie. This poison gas
that had killed so many Iranians was made in Germany."
In an interview with Russia Today, Ulfkotte said that it was "not right" what he had done,
and that his fear was that politicians were actively driving the world toward war:
"it is not right what I have done in the past,to manipulate people,to make
propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do, and have done in
the past, because they are bribed to betray the people not only in Germany, all over
Europe. ... I am very fearful of a new war in Europe, and I don't like to have this
situation again, because war is never coming from itself, there is always people who push
for war, and this is not only politicians, it is journalists too. ... We have betrayed our
readers,just to push for war. ... I don't want this anymore, I'm fed up with this
propaganda. We live in a banana republic, and not in a democratic country where
we have press freedom..."
In his book"The CIA and the Media," Watergate reporter Carl Bernstein quotes William
B. Bader, former CIA intelligence officer,in his testimony before the Senate
Intelligence Committee. Baeder said:
"There is quite an incredible spread of relationships. You don't need to manipulate
Time magazine, for example,because there are [Central Intelligence] Agency people
at the management level."
Bernstein writes:
"The Agency's relationship with the Times was by far its most valuable among
newspapers, according to CIA officials. From 1950 to 1966, about ten CIA
employees were provided Times cover under arrangements approved by the
newspaper's late publisher,Arthur Hays Sulzberger. The cover arrangements were
part of a general Times policy—set by Sulzberger—to provide assistance to the CIA
whenever possible."
Ulfkotte was on the staff of the Konrad Adenauer Foundation from 1999 to 2003,
according to his Wikipedia eala. He won the civic prize from the Annette Barthelt
Foundation in 2003.
31
XXI. Dr. David Martin Exposes the Names and Faces of the People Who Are
Killing Humanity; Red Pill Expo,November 19,2021
hltps://www.j amesjpn.net/conspiracy/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-names-and-
faces-behind-the-criminal-coronavirus-conspiracy
https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2021/11/20/dr-david-martin-who-they-are-the-
names-and-faces
If you thought the last Dr David Martin talk was exciting, this one, which he gave at the
Red Pill Expo is positively electrifying.
He says that this is "final" speech but that we will be hearing from him, only it will be a
new version: No more Mr Nice Guv. We let to see a bit of that in this presentation.
He is angry.
David has put the names and faces of all of the major players in the theater of the
COVID War onto one slide,which he says is important, because "We energize the
forces of darkness when we anonymize them and when we see their faces on a
screen,we realize that they're merely individuals that have lost the social contract
with humanity."
The purpose of this talk is to de-mystify the "they" of the COVID War.
THE COVID PRIVATEERS
"How many of you are familiar with the company, Anser? I love having this moment. Do
you know they are the single largest contractor in the entire COVID terrorism
campaign?...
"The companies on the right, that you think are the ones running this show [Pfizer,
Moderna, Johnson& Johnson, Merck Ridgeback, Gilead Sciences], are in fact a front [for
the companies on the left, Anser, Fors-Marsh, Palantir, Publicis Sapient].
"And you know what a front organization is? They're the ones that are supposed to take
the flack and take the heat. The ones on the left are the ones that actually got the money.
Operation Warp Speed went to Anser.
"You didn't know that, because you were told by the media that it went to Pfizer,
Moderna, Johnson & Johnson and all that kind of stuff. That's not true. The prime
contract of Operation Warp Speed went through Anser, a company none of you had heard
of!
"And you didn't hear about them because the contract was signed by ATI, a company
based in South Carolina, a company whose history has been government defense
contracts for the purposes of propaganda!
32
I wish I made that up. The prime contractor selected to run Operation Warp Speed was a
propaganda expert for the US Department of Defense...
"Anser is the way for the Federal Government never to be liable for the criminal
conspiracy they know they ran. They are now one of the top ten Federal Contractors in
history, below Lockheed-Martin, Raytheon and all those guys.
"Those names you know. You don't know Anser, the single company that, by COVID
rose—the highest-ranked rise in the history of federal contracting; the highest single-year
rise, ever was Anser—and none of you know who they are!...
"Anser Corporation, they're the ones running Operation Warp Speed and they've been
set up to shield these manufacturers from ever taking the financial liability for their
willful misconduct.
And one day, everybody's gonna go, `Let's sue Pfizer! Let's go sue everybody else! And
the only problem is when we go to sue them, they say, `Hey! It wasn't us!' And they're
right and all of us were asleep. And I'm talking to a woke crowd, here and all of you
were asleep.
"Don't tell me you're awake if you're still sleeping, because if you didn't know who
Anser is, you're still asleep!
IT GETS WORSE...
"It gets worse. Fors-Marsh, anybody know Fors-Marsh?...They're the branding agency
that branded COVID. They're the ones who make sure we find hospitals that are overrun
with people. They're the ones who find kids that died of COVID right before the FDA
needs to vote on giving kids injections. They're the ones that go around the world,
making sure every message is always the same: `We will not return to normal until we
have a vaccine.'
Thank you, Justin Trudeau! Where'd you get the script?From Fors-Marsh! And how
many of you knew that? None of ya!
"How about Palantir? Hey, that's a weird one, isn't it? Peter Thiel, who has successfully
run a company that has lost $200 million plus, every year for about seven or eight years,
goes public in the middle of COVID. Isn't timing interesting? Isn't it fascinating that a
company that's done nothing but lose billions of dollars goes public in the middle of the
worst economic cycle we've had? Isn't that funny? And did you actually go back and
read their public offering? Hah! Funny! I know you didn't, because there really wasn't
one, that's why you didn't read it!
"Because they went public in this very bizarre, backdoor way of actually selling
founder's stock into the market, so we got personally-enriched—personally-enriched—
using the public market as the laundering facility. Isn't that brilliant?
33
"But let's look at what they did for our COVID scandal. They actually came up with a
thing called Gotham Data Tracking...you know what that does? That's making sure
that every time you turn your phone on, when you get off the plane, when you cross the
state line, it gives you a little tag that goes, `Hey, do you want a COVID alert in your
neighborhood?' You know why? Because you are being monitored. Your phone is
being monitored. Your transactions are being monitored, your credit cards are
being monitored,your health behavior's being monitored,your vaccine status is
being monitored and it's all done under the contract run by Gotham Data Sciences,
the company that went public during COVID—and none of you knew about this.
"And you've been to Red Pills! And you still haven't taken the Red Pill! And by the way,
I'm not even to the good slide, yet. So be depressed! `Cause it's getting worse!
"Publicis Sapient, the Health and Human Services' IT contract. Have you ever wondered
how the data never seems to add up? Somebody always has allegedly the same reportable
data?
"Publicis Sapient has the Health and Human Services' IT contract to consolidate all of
the data, so guess what happens? Everybody has the same number of COVID cases to
report, when somebody from the media calls and says, `Hey, how many cases do we
haver `Oh, 40,000'. `Oh, round number, 40,000'...
"When, in the course of human history has a round number involving the word
`thousand' ever happened? There's never been a 10,000 heart day, there's never been a
round number day —until you actually control the Department of Health and Human
Services' entire IT platform and not one of you knows that that's a single contract, run by
Publicis Sapient...
"You've been focused on the right hand side the whole time and the left hand side is
doing the dirty work.
THE COVID PIRATES
"Now, why do I call them `privateers'? How many are familiar with the difference
between a pirate and a privateer?
Pirates go rape and marauding and stealing and...a privateer is the same thing, that has
permission to do it by a government that's gone corrupt.
That's what these are (points to the slide of COVID contractors). They're the privateers.
But hey, since we have privateers, it feels only appropriate that if we have a world of
privateers, we should also...have a world of pirates. And here's our pirates."
New slide shows the universities who've been involved in the COVID War: UNC Chapel
Hill, Vanderbilt, Emory, Johns Hopkins, University of California System, MIT, NYU
Langone, DZIF, Imperial College, IHME, Erasmus Medical Center.
34
"Pirates. UNC Chapel Hill, I talked about that. That's the guy who actually made the
weapon, Ralph Baric. Since 1999, $100 million to weaponize the particles of coronavirus.
Over $100 million. You've heard about$3.7 million going to Wuhan—ohhhh—3.7
million, that feels like a bad number.
"And how 'bout $28 billion of that coming from DARPA for their bioweapons
initiative?
Anybody heard of$28 billion that went through Anthony Fauci at NIAID?
Anyone hear about the $20 billion that went directly to UNC Chapel Hill,that
weaponized spike protein?
"You haven't heard about that, you haven't heard about that because we've been talking
about $3.7 million going to Wuhan. Stop being distracted by the cover story!...Because
the distraction is where the interesting thing is.
"UNC Chapel Hill, Vanderbilt, Emory, Johns Hopkins and University of California:
those are the pirates that have made the most money on federally-granted, disclosed
money going into the university sector. I'm calling them `pirates' for a very good reason.
They justify all of this in the name of science and education...
"I don't even care whether these people pretend to hide behind the `It's an academic
research project' to try and get out of the bioweapons definition.
The bioweapons definition says that if you enable a foreign entity to build something
known to harm humanity, you have already created a felony, you are going to jail for the
rest of your life and you are liable for $100 million penalty.
"So guess what? Welcome to Hell, all five of these universities! Because they're all
felons! All of'em!
"And how 'bout the right hand side? MIT, New York University Langone —hey, by the
way, Langone? Where did that name come from? Ken Langone? Anybody? Oh! I'm not
supposed to say that name out loud, Ken Langone, except I just did, didn't I? Ken
Langone...
"They're actually putting their name on the letterhead and you don't know who to look
for! You're still being told, `Oh, it's the Rothschilds and it's the Rockefellers!
"No, it's not! It's the guy who put his name on the facility! How many of you know who
Ken Langone is? Guess what? Look it up! Because that's a pretty big thing that you
should be aware of and unfortunately, you're not aware of it, for a very good reason
because he hid it in plain site, on the name of the medical center. New York University
Langone, like that's a really hard thing to find.
35
"DZIF Charite...you've heard of Dr Christian Drosten, the Crazy-in-Chief in Germany
who's kind of Anthony Fauci and Ralph Baric's evil stepchild, Imperial College, the
criminal conspirators who came up with the fear porn of how many people were going to
die, IHME, the University of Washington program, but the one I want to bring your
attention to is the one at the bottom, Erasmus Medical Center.
"Bart Haagmans...In 2002,Bart Haagmans was an interesting dude, because he
actually figured out a way to build a bunch of patents around the vaccines for the
coronavirus. Mysteriously, the European Union in 2012 started giving him massive,
massive grants to run a thing called Zapi.
"And Zapi was the zoonotic disease transmission laboratory for the European Union. And
Bart seemed to always get the money. Now, this is fascinating because Bart was also the
one who decided to patent MERS. The Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome, remember
that one? The one that never really happened but kinda happened in 2012-13? Bart was
the one that patented MERS...
"Erasmus Medical Center, actually, in their public statement, when they were confronted
with the lie, where they said that they hadn't filed a patent on the actual genome—kinda
like the CDC said in 2007 —when confronted with the lie, they said in public —and you
can't make this sh!t up, People, it's so funny! They said, `Well, what we said was not
entirely false in all jurisdictions in the world.'
THE COVID ORCHESTRA
"But this, Ladies and Gentlemen is the slide you wanted to see. This is actually the
names and faces of the people who are, in fact killing humanity. And that's ALL of
them. Now, here's the bad news: There's a lot of people on that slide, aren't there?
Here's the better news...I'll actually give you all this slide, because why not? Lets
make sure that we don't ever forget the names and the faces of the people who
decided to kill us..."
Here is a list of all the people in that slide:
Mukesh D. Ambani, Chairman, Reliance Industries
Peter Brabeck-Letmathe,Vice-Chairman of the Board of Trustees WEF
Mark Carney, UN Special Envoy for Climate Action
Chrystia Freeland, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Canada
Kristalina Georgieva, Managing Director of the IMF
Queen Rania of Jordan
David M. Rubenstein, Co-Founder and Executive Chairman, Carlyle Group
Klaus Schwab,Founder and Executive Chairman,WEF
Marc Benioff, Chair and Chief Executive Officer, Salesforce, WEF Trustee, WEF
Young Global Leader
Thomas Buberl, CEO, AXA
Laurence Fink, Chairman & CEO, BlackRock
Orit Gadiesh, Chairman, Bain & Company
Fabiola Gianotti, Director General, CERN
36
L. Rafael Reif, President of MIT
Mark Schneider, CEO, Nestle
Tharman Shanmugaratnam, Defense Minister, Singapore
Robert Mercer, Renaissance Fund
Larry Page, Google
Al Gore, Environmentalist
Angel Gurria, Secretary General OECD
Paula Ingabire, Minister of Information Communication Technology, Rwanda
Yo-Yo Ma, Cellist
Luis Alberto Moreno,WEF Young Global Leader
Jim Hagemann Snabe, Chairman of Siemens and of Maersk
Feike Sijbesma, Philco
Zhu Min, Deputy Managing Director, IMF
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook/Meta
Bill Gates, Microsoft
Herman Gref, CEO, Sberbank
Andre Hoffmann, Vice-Chairman Hoffman-La Roche
Christine Lagarde, President, European Central Bank
Peter Maurer, President, Red Cross
Patrice Motsepe, Chairman, African Rainbow Minerals
Julie Sweet, CEO, Accenture
Heizo Takenaka, Economist
Dustin Moskovitz, Open Philanthropy
David continues, "I want you to have some looks on there. Some are kind of interesting,
like cellist Yo-Yo Ma. Did you hear me say that? Cellist, Yo-Yo Ma.
"How about the head of the Wellcome Trust?Not surprising, there, right? How about
Princess Rania of Jordan? Ooh, that's weird.
"How about the woman who happens to be sitting at the helm of the leadership of the
government of Canada but conveniently out of sight but running 100% of the money for
the government of Canada.
"How about all of these interesting people like, Jim Hagemann Snabe, how about Zhu
Min, Chairman of the National Institute of Financial Research in China?
"And what makes these individuals interesting is that when you look at them, you find
out something very important. Almost none of them have sought public visibility. Isn't
that funny?
Which makes me pick on one of them. The guy I have here, at the bottom corner. And I
have to give him credit. He has done so much to stay out of sight.
"I've got 12 minutes left. I've got to spend a couple of minutes on the guy who's paid
37
every search engine optimization to keep his name out of search engines and I'm doing it
so that is costs him sh!tloads to keep all of you silent.
DUSTIN MOSKOVITZ: EDITING THE HUMAN GENOME
"So let's get really clear on Dustin Moskovitz. Shall we, Dustin Moskovitz?...You little
piece of sh!t! Let's talk about him for a minute. The Co-Founder of Facebook that you've
never heard of...also the guy who founded Open Philanthropy, who was the actual
check-writer for Event 201.You were told that it was the World Economic Forum.
You were told it was the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.You were told it was
Johns Hopkins University. But the actual check that cleared for the program was
signed by none other than Dustin Moskovitz...
"Now, I'm picking on him for a good reason. He's a felon, he's a criminal. He is one of
the most sociopathic, psychopathic, crazy people walking the planet and he's paid to keep
his name in private. So guess what? Don't let him!
The reason why I want to give you this slide is because I want every one of them named.
I want them all publicly named.
"Because it's time that we start going through the reality of saying, `We the People are
not going to let mass-murderers get away anonymously mass-murdering people. We are
not going to allow that to happen! Not on our watch! And that's why you have this
slide...
"But let's go back to Dustin. Isn't it interesting that Dustin conveniently decided to
shroud this entire public health crisis in a self-serving, self-interested investment
objective? He owns Sherlock biosciences. Sherlock Biosciences happens to be the
company that owns the CRISPR technology that is the joint venture between the
United States and China on gene editing the human genome...
"Dustin Moskovitz knew that if he actually tried to take this technology into the public,
nobody would be willing to do it,particularly, given the fact that it's a JV [joint
venture] between him and the government of China. That's the reason why we'd have
a problem with it. Because it feels like eugenics. You know why it feels like eugenics?
Because it is eugenics, that's why it feels like it! That's why it feels like Cold Spring
Harbor Labs...
"The only way we could get gene editing technology approved was with an
Emergency Use Authorization. Not surprisingly, once everybody was distracted on
vaccines and everybody was distracted on RTPCR and everybody was distracted on
everything else, Sherlock Biosciences slipped their Emergency Use Authorization
application into the FDA—and got it.
In other words, using the cover of COVID,which all of us are pretending to talk
about, the editing of the human genome was approved and not one of us said a
thing.
38
"Now, if you were going to edit the human genome, do you think you'd need a good
cover story to actually hide what you're really doing? You'd probably find the guy who
has the biggest financial interest in doing it and make sure, that while everyone is looking
over at coronavirus and COVID and trying to figure out these Lab Leak Hypothesis —
there's no Lab Leak Hypothesis, because there's no lab leak!
"So stop taking about lab leaks! there is no lab leak. This is the willful weaponization of
a spike protein, that's what it is. It's an act of war, it's not a leak. We need to start
calling it what it is. It's an act of war. It's an act of war against humanity.
"We stop pretending to take their bait and follow their stupid rabbit trails and follow
stupid rabbit trails into stupid rabbit holes and wonder why there's a bunch of pee and
piss and poo that smells like rabbit warrens. Well, it smells like it because that's what you
find at the end of a rabbit trail.
"We need to be focused on the point and people like Dustin Moskovitz and this slide is
going to be shared with everyone in this room, because it is incumbent on you. Now you
know. Now you must act. Because when we talk about the `they', we empower the
'they'.
"But when we talk about the names of people, we humanize the sociopathic behavior. We
humanize the fact that there are individuals and organizations that are willfully murdering
the humanity that we know and love and we cannot let that happen on our watch. It is
incumbent on all us to get those words out."
THE COVID CONSPIRING STATES
The next slide shows the countries of the US, Canada, UK, Germany, South Africa,
China and Australia and the logos of the following corporations: BlackRock, AXA,
HSBC, International Monetary Fund, United Healthcare, Insurance Corporation of British
Columbia.
"The most important part of this slide is what I put in the Atlantic Ocean, because the real
nation-state isn't a nation-state. Listen!...The Treaty of Westphalia, the stupid idea of
drawing lines on maps and calling them countries has long been dead.
"The real control is that," (points to the slide), "what I call the `Atlantic Coalition of
Doom.' The Atlantic Coalition of Doom: B1ackRock,AXA,the International
Monetary Fund, HSBC,ICBC and you guessed it, United Healthcare...
"United Healthcare is a corrupt organization. It is a corrupt organization. It must be called
what it is. It is actually the most manipulative corporate structures known to humanity,
because what it does is it matches life insurance and insurance products with the
delivery of healthcare, so they can so what? Manage your health? Oh-ho-ho no! Bet
against the timing of your death.
"That's the internal arbitrage. It is the wet dream of the Lloyd's of London syndicate.
39
They would have loved to have had this opportunity. But guess what? They didn't.
United Healthcare did. They put two things together,which means they get to manage
your life so they can time your death, so they can profit on both."
XXIL TRANSCRIPT Of Dr David E.Martin's Speech At The European Union
Parliament, Covid Summit,MAY 2023
hllps://rumble.com/v2ncp8w-dr-davi d-e.-martin-phd-covi d-summit-european-uni on-
parliament-may-2023.html
It is a, it is a particularly interesting location for me to be sitting today, given that over a
decade ago I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union Parliament.
And at that time I warned the world of what was coming, during that conversation that
was hosted at the time by the Green and EFA and a number of the other parties of the
European Unions, of various representations.
We were having a conversation on whether Europe should adopt the United States
policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials.
And at the time I urged this body and I urged people around the world that the
weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences.
Tragically, I sit here today, with that unfortunate line that I don't like to say, which is "I
told you so."
But the fact of the matter is, we're here not for a reprisal on past decisions. We're here to
actually, once again, come to the face of the human condition and ask the question, who
do we want to be?
What do we want humanity to look like?
And rather than seeing this as an exercise in futility, which is very easy from time to time
when you're in the position I'm in, I actually see this not as an exercise in futility.
I see this as one of the greatest opportunities that faces us because we now have a public
conversation, which is now front and center in people's minds.
When this was an esoteric conversation about biological patents, nobody cared.
But when that conversation came home, then it became something people can care about.
So I'm actually quite grateful for this opportunity.
I thank the members of Parliament for hosting this.
I thank all of the translators who I apologize in advance.
I will use terminology that is probably very difficult to translate, so my apologies, and I'd
also like to acknowledge the fact that many of you are aware of my involvement with this
in large part due to the amazing work of my wonderful wife, Kim Martin, who
encouraged me at the very early days of this pandemic to get on front of the camera and
talk about all the information that I had been sharing among very small groups around the
world.
And it was in fact her encouragement that put me in a place where many of you have
heard what I have to say.
Ironically, the world that I came from that used to be very popular, my CNBC and
Bloomberg presentations,which were televised on mainstream media around the
world,was an audience that I lost.
I can confidently say Covid diminished my fame,but I can also confidently say that
I'd rather stand among the people with whom I'm standing today than any of the
40
folks that were part of that previous world.
So, this is a much better place to be.
My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context, because this
did not come in the last three years.
This did not come in the last five or six years.
This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early
stages of the mid 19 hundreds, but certainly by 1913, 1914, this conversation started right
here in Central Europe.
The pandemic that we alleged to have happen in the last few years also did not happen
overnight.
In fact, the very specific pandemic using coronavirus began in a very different time.
Most of you don't know that Coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in
1965.
Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious, replicatable viral
models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of human
condition.
It was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold.
But what's particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was
immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole
host of reasons.
And you heard me correctly,that was 1965.
And by the way, these slides are public domain.
You're welcome to look at every single reference.
Every comment that I made is based on published material.
So do make sure that you look at those references.
But in 1966, the very first COV Coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological
experiment in human manipulation, and you heard the date 1966.
I hope you're getting the point of what I'm saying.
This is not an overnight thing.
This is actually something that's been long in the making.
A year before I was born, we had the first Trans-Atlantic coronavirus data sharing
experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom.
And in 1967,the year I was born,we did the first human trials on inoculating people
with modified coronavirus.
Isn't that amazing?
56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that's been 56 years in engineering, and
I want that to chill with all of you.
Where were we when we actually allowed in violation of biological and chemical
weapons treaties?
Where were we as a human civilization when we thought it was an acceptable thing
to do to take a pathogen for the United States and infect the world with it?
Where was that conversation and what should have been that conversation in 1967?
That conversation wasn't had. Ironically, the common cold was turned into a chimera
in the 1970s, and in 1975, 1976 and 1977,we started figuring out how to modify
coronavirus by putting it into different animals.
Pigs and dogs.
41
And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as a
infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries, the industries of
dogs and pigs.
Dog breeders and pigs found that Coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems,
and that became the basis for Pfizer's first spike protein vaccine.
Patent filed.Are you ready for this In 1990?
Did you hear what I just said?
1990.
Operation Warpspeed.
I'm sorry.
Where's the warp and the speed?
Pfizer 1990.
The very first spike protein vaccine for Coronavirus.
Isn't that fascinating?
Isn't it fascinating that we were, we were told that, well, the spike protein is a new thing.
We just found out that that's the problem.
No.
As a matter of fact, we didn't just find out it was not just now.
Now the problem, we found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in
1990 for the spike protein of Coronavirus.
And who would've thought Pfizer?
Clearly the innocent organization that does nothing but promote human health.
Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber, in every
chamber of every government around the world, not that Pfizer, certainly they wouldn't
have had anything to do with this, but oh yes, they did.
And in 1990 they found out that there was a problem with vaccines.
They didn't work.
You know why they didn't work?
It turns out that Coronavirus is a very malleable model.
It transforms and it changes, and it mutates over time.
As a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for Coronavirus from 1990 until
2018, every single publication concluded that Coronavirus escapes the vaccine
impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective.
And since 1990 to 2018, that is the published science ladies and gentlemen, that's
following the science, following the science is their own indictment of their own
programs that said,it doesn't work.
And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few hundred. And not paid
for by pharmaceutical companies.
These are publications that are independent scientific research that shows
unequivocally including efforts of the chimera modifications made by Ralph Bair in
the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill.
All of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus.
That's the science, and that science has never been disputed.
But then we had an interesting development in 2002, and this date is most important
because in 2002,the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill patented, and I quote,
an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus.
42
Listen to those words ...
Infectious replication, defective.
What does that phrase actually mean?
For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you.
Infectious replication.
Defective means a weapon.
It means something meant to target an individual but not have collateral damage to other
individuals.
That's what infectious replication defective means.
And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID's Anthony Fauci from
1999 to 2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina Chapel
Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year.
"Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn't from a wet market in Wuhan?"
"Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North
Carolina Chapel Hill?"
No, I'm not suggesting it.
I'm telling you that's the facts we engineered SARS.
SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon.
The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold.
It's called influenza-like illness.
It's called gastroenteritis.
That's the naturally occurring coronavirus.
SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to
actually attack human beings, and they patented it in 2002.
And in 2003, giant surprise,the CDC filed the patent on Coronavirus isolated from
humans in violation once again of biological and chemical weapons,treaties and
laws that we have in the United States, and I'm very,very precise on this.
United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else, and the rule of law and all
the nonsense that we like to talk about, but we don't ratify treaties about, I don't know,
defending humans.
We conspicuously avoid that we actually have a great track record of advocating for
human rights and then denying them when it comes to actually being part of the
international community, which is a slightly problematic thing.
But let's get something very clear.
When the CDC,in April of 2003 filed the patent on SARS Coronavirus isolated
from humans,what did they do?
They downloaded a sequence from China, and filed a patent on it in the United
States.
Any of you familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows that's a
violation.
That's a crime.
That's not an innocent, oops; that's a crime.
And the United States Patent Office went as far as to reject that patent application
on two occasions until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office to override the
patent examiner to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS Coronavirus.
But let's not let that get away from us, because it turns out that the RT PCR, which was
43
the test that we allegedly were going to use to identify the risks associated with
coronavirus, was actually identified as a bioterrorism threat by me in the European Union
sponsored events in 2002 and 2003, 20 years ago that happened here in Brussels and
across Europe.
In 2005,this particular pathogen was specifically labeled as a bioterrorism and
bioweapon platform technology, described as such.
That's not my terminology that I'm applying to it.
It was actually described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005.
And from 2005 onwards,it was actually a bio warfare enabling agent.
It's official classification from 2005 forward.
I don't know if that sounds like public health to you, does it?
Biological warfare enabling technology that feels like not public health,that feels
like not medicine,that feels like a weapon, designed to take out humanity.
That's what it feels like, and it feels like that because that's exactly what it is.
We have been lured into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these
organizations are what we should be pointing to.
But we've been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over $10 billion have
been funneled through black operations,through the check of Anthony Fauci and a
side-by-side ledger where MAD has a balance sheet, and next to it is a biodefense
balance sheet.
Equivalent dollar for dollar matching that no one in the media talks about, and it's
been going on since 2005.
Our gain of function moratorium.
The moratorium that was supposed to freeze any efforts to do gain of function research.
Conveniently, in the fall of 2014, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill received
a letter from MAD saying that while the gain of function moratorium on coronavirus in
vivo should be suspended, because their grants had already been funded, they received an
exemption.
Did you hear what I just said?
A biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill
received an exemption from the gain of function moratorium so that by 2016 we
could publish the journal article that said SARS Coronavirus is poised for human
emergence in 2016 and what,you might ask Dave,was the coronavirus poised for
human emergence?
It was WIV ONE.
Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus One.
Poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018,the following phrase entered
into common parlance among the community,there is going to be an accidental or
intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.
The operative word, obviously in that phrase, the word release, does that sound like
leak?
Does that sound like a bat and a Pangolin went into a bar in the Wuhan market and hung
out and had sex?
44
And, and to and behold, we got SARS Cov-2.
No, accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen was the terminology used.
And four times in April of 2019, seven months before the allegation of patient
number one, four patent applications of Moderna were modified to include the term
accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen as the justification for
making a vaccine for a thing that did not exist.
If you have not done so, please make sure that you make reference in every investigation
to the premeditation nature of this, because it was in September of 2019 that the world
was informed.
That we were going to have an accident or intentional release of a respiratory
pathogen so that by September,2020 there would be a worldwide acceptance of a
universal vaccine template.
That's their words right in front of you on the screen.
The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template, and the
intent was to use coronavirus to get there.
Let's, let's read this because we have to read this into the record everywhere I go.
"Until an infectious disease crisis is very real present and at the emergency
threshold that is often largely ignored to sustain the funding base beyond the crisis."
He said, "we need to increase the public understanding for the need for medical
countermeasures, such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine."
"A key driver is the media and the economics will follow the hype. We need to use
that hype to our advantage to let to the real issues. Investors will respond if they see
profit at the end of the process."
Sounds like public health.
Sounds like the best of humanity.
No.
Ladies and gentlemen, this was premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the
proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015, published in front of them.
This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race, and it
was admitted to in writing that this was a financial heist and a financial fraud.
"Investors will follow if they see profit at the end of the process."
Let me conclude by making five very brief recommendations.
The last slide, nature was hijacked.
This whole story started in 1965 when we decided to hijack a natural model and decide to
start manipulating it.
Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions
authorized under the patent protection of the CDC,the FDA,the NIH, and their
equivalent organizations around the world.
We didn't have independent science.
We had hijacked science, and unfortunately there was no moral oversight in violation of
45
all of the codes that we stand for.
There was no independent, financially disinterested independent review board ever
empanelled around coronavirus.
Not once, not once, not since 1965.
We do not have a single independent IRB ever empanelled, around Coronavirus.
So, morality was suspended for medical countermeasures, and ultimately humanity was
lost because we decided to allow it to happen.
Our job today is to say, no more gain of function research period.
No more weaponization of nature period.
And most importantly, no more corporate patronage of science for their own self-
interest unless they assume 100% product liability for every injury and every death
that they maintain.
Thank you very much.
Dr David E. Martin
Speaker- Covid Summit—European Union Parliament—May 2023
XXIIL Breaking The WEF Matrix: How To Resist The Great Reset
httys:Hvfsma2azine.com/2023/07/30/wef-resist-the-2reat-rese
Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum, in lock-step with the UN, is marching the world
toward an economic and societal "great reset." Did you vote for this?
By Staff Writers
Have you heard of"The Great Reset," powered by a select group of Davos "global elite?"
They convene at annual meetings in the Swiss alpine ski resort of Davos, to legitimize
and normalize their influence on democratic nations. Their objective is simple: total
control of humanity using the private sector, science, and technology while reshaping
democracies to form a global government.
If it sounds conspiratorial and Orwellian, that's because it is— and it's happening right in
front of your eyes in plain sight.
Global foreign policy brought to you by the World Economic Forum
Born out of a CIA-funded Harvard program headed by Henry Kissinger and driven
to fruition by economist John Kenneth Galbraith and nuclear strategist Herman
Kahn—in 1971 German engineer Klaus Schwab,with the help of well-connected
American policymakers,would create what would become the most influential
European public policy institute,the European Management Forum (EMIT),
continuing, from 1987 onwards, as the World Economic Forum (WEF).
In 1971, the first meeting of the European Management Forum —then called
the European Management Symposium —convened in Davos, Switzerland. Around 450
participants from 31 countries would take part in Schwab's first European Management
46
Symposium, mostly made up of managers from various European companies,politicians,
US academics and media representatives.
Several years later, Henry Kissinger, in an opening address at the 1980 World Economic
Forum (WEF) conference told Davos "elites": "For the first time in history, foreign
policy is truly global." Twenty years later, in 2000, Bill Clinton became the first sitting
American president to attend Davos.
What is `The Great Reset' and who's pulling the strings?
The WEF is led by founder and Executive Chairman Klaus Schwab. The seemingly
innocuous Davos crowd describes itself as an"international organization for public-
private cooperation" that engages political, business, and industry leaders of society
to shape global, regional, and industry agendas.
The international lobbying organization has caught the world's attention— and ire— in
recent years. Particularly, the WEF's partnership with the United Nations, their
lockstep Agenda 2030, and Klaus Schwab's Great Reset— a globalist-driven
initiative to establish Schwab's vision of stakeholder capitalism,where corporations
are positioned as "trustees of society" to address the world's economic and social
woes.
Stakeholder Capitalism: A failed idea repackaged by Klaus Schwab
Independent investigative journalist, and author,Ian Davis posits a more nuanced
view of Schwab's stakeholder capitalism (a failed concept that's been around since
1932):
"A global network of stakeholder capitalist partners are collaborating to usher in what
they claim to be a new model of enhanced democratic accountability that includes "civil
society". However, beneath their deceptive use of the term civil society lies an ideology
which offers this network an unprecedented degree of political control that threatens to
extinguish representative democracy entirely."
What is further obfuscated is that civil society stakeholders are selected.
"Representatives from NGOs, religious communities, unions, and philanthropic
foundations are the selected stakeholders whose only role is to agree with the
policies placed on the table by the public-private partnership," Davis adds. Their
consent is deemed your consent.
"The conflict of interest is obvious... Supposedly, a G3P-led system of global
governance is somehow beneficial for us. Believing this requires a considerable degree of
naivete." Iain Davis
If you look behind the curtain, mounting evidence suggests the notorious Wizard: de
facto ruler of Davos who aims to "improve the state of the world," is peddling do-gooder
47
rhetoric to mask a more sinister brand of stakeholder capitalism.A model that will
ultimately transfer power away from true democratic processes into a system of
governance by a small elect group,trained to continue the agenda set for them by
the previous generation, as predicted by Herman Kahn.
In 1967, Herman Kahn wrote one of the most significant futurist works of the 20th
century, The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years.
In his book, Kahn explores subverting democracy by training a certain group in
society as potential leaders,with those pre-selected few groomed for power being
able to define what our shared values as a society should be. Sound familiar?
Today's World Economic Forum's Young Global Leader scheme is the exact
manifestation of his original proposal.
In essence,they will hold all the cards,whilst the common people will be left with
illusory pseudo-democratic processes,poverty, and constant absurd psycholo2ical
operations SYOPs to sow chaos and distract us all unceasingly.
"You will own nothing and be happy."8 predictions for the world in 2030, World
Economic Forum (Video
Upon further inspection of the WEF founding member dogmas, such as Herman Kahn's
prospective aim to create a unified American and European superstate, to today's WEF
think pieces on 15-minute cities, reduced private car ownership by 75%, advancing
cashless society driven by programmable Central Bank Digital Currency CBDC ,
and the infamous and hastily deleted "You will own nothing and be happy"
propaganda piece (archived here)—their agendas and reforms suggest intentions
that are not so benign.
Instead, what lurks beneath noble jargon is a complicated and disingenuous "Build Back
Better" tagline for The Great Reset carried out with globalist lock-step synergy as a
distinct flavor of centralized Orwellian control slowly takes hold.
Neo-Marxist Schwab has also drawn scrutiny for his comments lauding the WEF's
ability to "penetrate cabinets" of world governments and praise for the Chinese
"social credit score" system (reinforced by mass surveillance, and predictive
policing) declaring it as a model for the West. In 2016, Schwab griped to then U.S.
Vice President Joseph Biden about how the American middle class is holding back his
Fourth Industrial Revolution.
"The fourth industrial revolution is not only changing what we do but also who we are.
The impact it will have on us as individuals is manifold, affecting our identity and its
many related facets— our sense of privacy, our notions of ownership, our consumption
patterns, the time we devote to work and leisure, how we develop our careers, cultivate
our skills." — The Fourth Industrial Revolution, by Klaus Schwab, Pg. 92
48
Meanwhile, a key advisor to Schwab, Israeli transhumanist(fundamentally a hi-tech
rendition of eugenic engineering advocacy) and historian Yuval Noah Harari says, "Free
will... that's over!"
A frequent keynote speaker at Davos WEF annual summits,Harari readily
discusses the "useless class" of humans who can be hacked and manipulated using
digital surveillance under their skin, the rise of digital dictatorships where "humans
are now hackable animals," and the creation of a global surveillance state.
Harari also believes in culling the population. In a 2015 TEDGlobal Talk, he asks:
"What do we need so many humans for?"
The Great Reset trojan horse
In June 2019,the WEF signed a Strategic Partnership Framework agreement with
the United Nations. The WEF and the UN agreed to collaboratively "accelerate the
implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: milestones to
complete the UN's plan for the 21s' century, also known as Agenda 21 —the UN's
vision for a centrally managed global society. The policies required to achieve these
sustainable development goals (SDGs) are developed by the multi-stakeholder
partnership.
A closer look at UN Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030.
The original Agenda 21, a 351 page document, outlines the United Nations' plan for a
centrally managed global society. This contract binds governments around the world to
the UN plan for controlling the way we live, eat, learn, move and communicate —all
under the noble banner of saving the earth.
Unlike Agenda 21, which operates under the guise of saving the environment, Agenda
2030 is truly a template for global governance. In addition to addressing climate change,
it also sets ambitious goals for areas such as economics, health, energy, education,
agriculture, gender equality, and a whole host of other issues. Billed as a"new universal
Agenda" for humanity it is literally a blueprint for transforming global society.
Solidly rooted in the Agenda 21 document, adopted by the United Nations in 1992,
Agenda 2030's "sustainable development" mission is a call for the micromanagement
of the lives of every man,woman and child across the world. If fully implemented,
Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 would have the government involved in every aspect of
life of every human on earth.
World Economic Forum: The Net Zero Transition
With this strategic partnership in place, the WEF and the corporations they represent are
now engaged in "effective collaboration" with the 193 national governments represented
at the UN, also known as The Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P). As a result, the
WEF, an unelected globalist organization, is directly partnering with suposedly
sovereign governments in the development of global policy agendas.
49
Globalists want to fundamentally transform virtually everything about today's society.
The Great Reset, as described in Schwab's book, calls for a"reset of our economic and
social foundations" to "instigate stakeholder capitalism."
The now-defunct Great Reset microsite briefly described the initiative: "There is an
urgent need,for global stakeholders to cooperate in simultaneously managing the direct
consequences of the COVID-19 crisis. To improve the state of the world, the World
Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative. "
On June 3, 2020, then Prince Charles, became the official patron of the WEF's Great
Reset and officially launched the project, tweeting out#TheGreatReset, after delivering a
Great Reset address at Davos that same day.
Author Matthew Ehret explains how the Great Reset is a trojan horse designed to
subvert democracies. "When one reviews the nature of those reforms on the World
Economic Forum's websites which are intended to replace the policies of the pre-
COVID era,it becomes crystal clear that this Great Reset (which combines full
spectrum remedies to the dual crises of COVID and Global Warming),is merely
another attempt to steer humanity into a techno-feudal, depopulated cage under a
system of global governance managed by social engineers and their oligarchical
patrons."
How to resist the `Great Reset'
As the specter of WEF initiatives and reforms are now snaking their way into mainstream
discourse and government-backed policies, those opposed to the World Economic Forum,
UN Agenda 2030, and Schwab's Great Reset say it is essential for people to stay vigilant,
as what some describe as Orwellian and dystopian "solutions" are gradually foisted upon
the global population.
"What we have to confront is a deep systemic and structural restructuring of our world,"
WEF Chairman Schwab told attendees at the 2022 G20 Bali Summit, which also features
the "B20," a gathering of global corporate business leaders. "This will take some time,"
Schwab continued. "And the world will look differently after we have gone through this
transition process."
As World Economic Forum globalists push ahead with their"Great Reset," there are
measures you can take to repudiate and hinder their plans.
Dr. Simon Goddek, a biotechnologist, entrepreneur and the founder of Sunfluencer, a
vocal critic of the World Economic Forum, recently outlined 25 steps you can take to
resist Schwab's Great Reset— an agenda that aims to forcibly transition the world into
Klaus Schwab's image. Here's a look at 12 of the 25 recommended courses of action.
1. Turn off your TV.
50
Or even better—throw it out of your window. There is hardly anything decent on TV.
Mainstream media worldwide reports the same propaganda resulting in mass anxiety. By
the way, it has been known since the 80s that television can harm mental health. In the
last three years, they were shamelessly trying to make us believe that watching TV is
good for you when sitting home alone due to unscientific and arbitrary lockdowns.
2. Eat lots of pasture meat, and not bugs.
Klaus Schwab and the WEF want us to "eat ze bugs." A fried locust is definitely not the
future of our diet, even though the media is pushing for it. Instead, we should eat as our
forefathers did: meat, fish, shellfish, roots, eggs, vegetables, and fruits. Skip the bugs —
feed them to the chicken.
3. Consume alternative and objective media.
There are many great alternative media sources such as Telegram, Substack newsletters,
thematic blogs, critical Twitter accounts, and general news such as the Off Guardian or
TNT Radio. Also, try to learn how to read scientific studies, including their methodology
(which is almost always biased). This will improve your decision-making processes.
4. Reject vaccination and CO2 passports, and digital IDs.
The German Green Parry, currently part of the government, already proposed climate
passports before the "pandemic." The CO2 credit and the social credit score will come; it
is only a matter of time. Fortunately, they won't succeed if insufficient people comply. I
know many people that took the vaccine only to be able to travel. This degree of
gaslighting and blackmailing mustn't happen again.
5. Be self-sufficient regarding water, food, and electricity.
Governments fear nothing more than self-sufficient and independent citizens. If you grow
and produce everything yourself, the government cannot impose taxes on it. It also makes
you less susceptible to blackmail. Even if you only own a balcony or roof terrace in a
city, chances are you have enough space to grow pesticide-free vegetables and soak up
some sun rays. Alternatively,join an allotment association.
6. Own your land and farm it.
Owning some land is crucial these days. Before growing anything there, I strongly advise
improving the soil of your land. Rumble and Odysee provide many videos
about composting and mulching. You also might want to look into the principles of
agroforestry and permaculture. Typically, an area as small as 1,000 sqm is enough to
provide your family (including grandparents, siblings and cousins)with meat, eggs,
fruits, and vegetables.
51
7. Insist on your tech privacy.
Man is a creature of habits, so I know this step can be difficult. But for the sake of your
privacy, this step is quite crucial. Big Tech is one of our main enemies, and you don't
want Google, Zuckerberg, and TikTok to know more about more about you than you do.
I personally like Ubuntu or Mint Linux operating systems, as they are beautiful and user-
friendly. CalyxOS is an Android operating system that puts privacy into your hands. A
de-Googled phone is a safer phone.
8. Protect your online privacy and ditch Google.
SearX and Brave but don't Google. We all Google, and I must admit that Google offers
excellent features. However, Google is a dangerous data miner that also manipulates
search algorithms. SearX is a brilliant alternative. So is Brave, which uses its own search
engine.
9. Pay with cash, and avoid bonus programs.
Cash is power and especially anonymous: It allows for transactions to be made without
any digital footprint or trace, preserving your privacy. Pay with it whenever possible. I
have been without a bank account for one year because of expressing my opinion online.
Other dissidents have been debanked and their assets have also been frozen and blocked.
Doing everything digitally makes you the perfect slave: resist! Also, do not participate in
payback programs. They use your data to generate money; nobody gives money away for
free.
10. Diversify your investments.
Allocate portions of your money into assets like gold, cryptocurrencies, land, and more.
Don't put all your trust in big banks or digital currencies, especially CBDCs controlled
by governments. The increasing push towards state-controlled digital currencies can pose
a threat to your financial independence due to potential issues like lack of privacy,
manipulation, and even outright control of your financial resources. Personally, I consider
tangible assets like metals and land to be safe investments. It's always wise to hedge your
bets, particularly considering the looming possibility of a global crisis, unlike anything
we've seen before.
11. Prepare for the unexpected.
Learn basic survival skills such as starting a fire, purifying water, and basic first aid. This
doesn't only prepare you for possible future crises, but also enhances your self-reliance
and confidence.
12.Avoid unnecessary debt.
52
Minimize your reliance on credit and strive to live within your means. High levels of debt
essentially make you owned by banks or the government, as they possess financial
leverage over your decisions and actions. This debt culture lays the foundation for
a social credit system, where your credit history could potentially influence your access
to various societal privileges. Avoid this by cutting unnecessary expenses, focusing on
savings, and investing wisely.
Build parallel systems to resist global governance and the `Great Reset'
From admittedly penetrating_governments, proposed regulation of mind
control technologies by WEF-member corporations, recalibrating freedom of
speech, implantings martphones into your body, and compliance tracking pills that
contain microchips; to praise for compulsory pandemic measures stating lockdowns are
quietly improving cities around the world, and a Great Reset to restructure society
marking the death of capitalism—their ambitions—dressed up in sustainable
development garb — are decidedly Orwellian.
At the 2022 WEF Davos annual meeting, Alibaba Group president J. Michael Evans
boasted about the development of an"individual carbon footprint tracker" to monitor
what you buy, what you eat, and where/how you travel. Do you see where this is going?
Finally, as it pertains to policy, elect— at all levels of government—representatives that
reject WEF agendas and reforms. If your elected officials treat the WEF as the rogue,
unelected, illegitimate organization that it is, its influence would be greatly diminished.
Are your leaders members of the WEF? To find out, conduct a Brave site search
using the politician's name as the search phrase.
Example: site:weforum.orglpeople Tustin trudeau
Identify local, state, and federal WEF state actors (Manchurian candidates including
politicians, lobbyists, and activists)who craft ideas and solicit government authorities to
garner significant influence on laws and regulations that subvert core democratic values
and constitutional rights.
• Contact your U.S. House and Senate representatives.
• Leverage Al chatbots like Resistbot for civic engagement to contact your officials
in two minutes or less.
• Browse bills in the U.S. Congress with GovTrak, relating to a specific subject and
find legislation that impacts you.
• Search the Climate Change Laws of the World database to review climate laws
and policies globally.
"The real core of the Great Reset strategy is to seize control ... The objective is to take
private-interest profit-making producers of goods and services and convert them into
public institutions that will fulfill various other public purposes in the public interest. The
53
labels for such activity are now familiar, including CSR(Corporate Social
Responsibility), ESG (Environment, Social, and Governance), Impact investing,
sustainability and the like." —Financial Post
Build parallel systems to counter those imposed by multinational WEF-groomed
corporations. If you stop giving them your money, they'll stop using your money to
poison the well of democracy.
Then, they'll own nothing. And we'll all be happy.
Read the full list here.