My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-30 Annette O'Toole - Climate Change
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-03-11 - Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-12-05 Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
11-04-24 thru 12-04-24 Additional Individual Testimonies
>
2024-11-30 Annette O'Toole - Climate Change
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/2/2024 5:41:02 PM
Creation date
3/10/2025 4:22:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/30/2024
Description
2024-11-30 Annette O'Toole - Climate Change
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: ascend i nasta rseed <br /> To: WPCtestimonv;LPCtestimonv <br /> Subject: Revise Hawaii General Plan Testimony Here <br /> Date: Saturday,November 30,2024 12:24:12 PM <br /> Aloha Commissioners, <br /> The Big island Plan cannot go through the way it is designed. It is hard to believe any local helped <br /> design this plan. <br /> Here are some concerns: <br /> • There is a huge part of the plan dedicated to "Climate Change". However,why do most <br /> experts state there is NO climate danger? Climate Experts Speak Out Against Climate <br /> Danger Click Here! <br /> • The word "Stakeholder," defined in the plan, is written 86 times and literally means anyone <br /> in the entire world can have input on this plan. <br /> • Please recommend Stakeholder change to the following: "Local Communities". Local <br /> Communities are local Big Island farmers,homeowners,renters, organizations,businesses, <br /> and individuals who live on Big Island or have property on Big Island that will be personally <br /> affected by projects, decisions, or activities in the general plan. Effective local community <br /> engagement and management are crucial for the success and sustainability of any initiative, <br /> as it helps ensure that diverse perspectives and interests are considered. <br /> • The OSCER Department in the plan will null and void all public input and leave decisions to <br /> unelected officials. This is NOT okay! This department should not be created. This is on <br /> page 188, 40.8. <br /> • The Planning Department has sent out letters too many homeowners telling them their land <br /> use will be changed from resident to recreation due to the General Plan 2045. This will <br /> drastically lower their property value and opens the door to rezone the area. This is not <br /> pono. It breaks the Aloha Spirit law § 5-7.5. To reduce someone's property value is not <br /> okay. This must be made pono again. <br /> • There is a huge section on climate change and things that will be affected. This needs to be <br /> further researched. There are over 1900 credentialed scientist that say there is no climate <br /> danger. Here is the pdf showing the scientist and what country they are from. <br /> htti2s:Hclintel.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/WCD-241023.12df John Coleman, the first <br /> weather man for Good Morning America and the Founder of the Weather Channel has gone <br /> on CNN and other media outlets stating; "There is no climate danger". He explain the reason <br /> for this narrative is the investors, in renewable energy_want to make these changes <br /> • Hilo does not have a Community Development Plan. How can a Big Island General Plan <br /> move forward without that? Hilo is 22% of the island. <br /> • 1.13 under "Increase the biodiversity and resilience of native habitats" reads, "Incentivize <br /> private land management practices that protect and enhance natural resource values and, <br /> when appropriate,pursue the acquisition of lands for the protection of natural resources." <br /> 'Incentives" mean more taxes. "Protection" means more rules. Who's "values" is this plan <br /> referring too because it's not the locals? "Pursue the acquisition of lands" does this say they <br /> are going to pursing taking people's private property? Again with "protection of natural <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.