My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2024-11-1 Chuck Flaherty Testimony GP 2045 1 of 2
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Board Packets
>
2025
>
2025-03-11 - Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting
>
2024-11-04 Windward Continuance of Special General Plan Meeting - Biocultural/Climate Change
>
WPC Testimony 11/1-11/4
>
2024-11-1 Chuck Flaherty Testimony GP 2045 1 of 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/1/2024 3:53:03 PM
Creation date
3/10/2025 4:22:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Plan Doc Template
Document Date
11/1/2024
Description
Email Testimony 1 of 2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PROJECT DOCUMENT <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Date: April 18, 2016 <br />Authors: Amy DeBay, Ian Varley, Doug Walker <br />Introduction <br />Task S2 (Land Use Allocation) setsup a framework for estimating future development patterns <br />(amounts and location) based on a set of rules. Task E (Trend Scenario) uses an initial, calibrated run of <br />the allocation model to estimate future development patterns based on historical trends. These tasks <br />go hand-in-hand and are combined in this technical report. <br />Allocation Concepts and Approach <br />Future development patterns (amounts and location) are estimated using an algorithm-driven process <br />called allocation. Allocation models the interplay between market demand for development in certain <br />locations (“desirability”) and amount of development allowed according to current regulations or by <br />future land use patterns suggested by alternate scenarios (“capacity”). Given a pre-determined amount <br />of growth expected in the given time frame (here, new growth between 2015 and 2040), the allocation <br />process estimates where each incremental unit of new development will go, following the basic <br />presumption that the most desirable areas will be developed first, capacity allowing. Thus highly <br />desirable areas are assigned growth first, and then slightly less desirable areas get developed next, etc., <br />until all the estimated growth amount has been accommodated. Numerous refinements to the basic <br />principle are used to produce the final estimates. For example, parcels aren’t always filled all the way to <br />capacity, a certain amount of controlled “randomness” is often applied to the growth pattern, etc. For <br />mixed use areas, both residential and non-residential growth can be assigned. <br /> <br />In this study, a CommunityViz tool called Allocator 5 is used. The methods combined with the <br />algorithms in Allocator 5 provide a well-reasoned analysis that will be helpful for this and myriad other <br />planning studies, but it is recognized that the results have limitations in terms of modelling precision <br />and confidence. The CommunityViz allocation method is sometimes described as “light-weight” to <br />“medium-weight,” differentiating it from the “heavy-weight” algorithms such as UrbanSim or PECAS <br />that are considerably more sophisticated but are more difficult and expensive to implement. In <br />contrast, the Allocator 5 method is easier to use and lends itself well to “what-if” type scenario <br />planning. <br /> <br />At the highest level, the allocation algorithm takes 3 inputs—growth amount, capacity, and <br />desirability—and generates 1 output—a pattern of future development. Our methods for each of these <br />are described next. <br />Growth Amount <br />As a 2015 baseline for housing unit data, Placeways used data from the County’s Real Property Tax <br />(RPT) office to identify the number of housing units and non-residential square feet. The procedure <br />began with a database file from RPT that, unfortunately, lacked metadata, so the fields were <br />interpreted manually. For each TMK, buildings were converted to housing units where appropriate <br />Trend Scenario and Land Use Allocation Technical Report 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.