My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
State Historic Bridge Inventory and Evaluation (2024 Update)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Cultural Resources Commission
>
Materials
>
2025
>
2025-05-14
>
HDOT Historic Bridge Program - 2024 Inventory Update (PL-INT-2022-001460)
>
State Historic Bridge Inventory and Evaluation (2024 Update)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/19/2025 2:27:25 PM
Creation date
4/24/2025 2:28:08 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
124
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
STATE HISTORIC BRIDGE INVENTORY AND EVALUATION 2024 UPDATE <br /> Location and setting will be important for those properties whose design is a reflection of their <br /> immediate environment, such as designed landscapes. <br /> For a historic district to retain integrity, the majority of the components that make up the district's <br /> historic character must possess integrity even if they are individually undistinguished. In addition, the <br /> relationships among the district's components must be substantially unchanged since the period of <br /> significance. <br /> Department of Transportation (DOT)Act of 1966, 23 U.S.C. § 138 <br /> This act includes a special provision, referred to as Section 4(f) and now codified at 23 C.F.R. § 138, that <br /> stipulates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)and other DOT agencies cannot approve the use <br /> of land from publicly owned parks, recreational areas, wildlife and waterfowl refuges, or public and <br /> private historical sites unless the following conditions apply: <br /> • There is no feasible and prudent alternative to the use of land, and <br /> • The action includes all possible planning to minimize harm to the property resulting from use. <br /> "Use" of a property protected under Section 4(f) may be defined as a) permanent incorporation of land, <br /> b)temporary occupation of land if that temporary occupancy meets certain criteria, or c) by effect of <br /> proximity where noise, visibility, or other like conditions substantially impair the protected features of <br /> the property. <br /> In 2005, as part of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users <br /> (SAFETEA-LU, Public Law 109-59, Aug. 10, 2005), Congress amended Section 4(f)to provide an <br /> alternative method of approving the use of protected resources where the impact is de minimis. The de <br /> minimis impact determination provides the basis for the U.S. DOT to approve the minor use of a Section <br /> 4(f) property without identifying and evaluating avoidance alternatives, thus streamlining the approval <br /> process. The Section 4(f) regulations are located at 23 C.F.R. Part 774. <br /> National Environmental Policy Act(NEPA)of 1969,42 U.S.C. §§4321-4347 <br /> NEPA requires Federal agencies to identify and consider the environmental impacts of Federal actions <br /> and includes consideration of impacts on cultural resources. As required by the NHPA and NEPA, every <br /> Federal agency must provide for the identification and consideration of historic properties prior to <br /> undertaking any action that may potentially affect these resources. This applies to state agencies that <br /> receive Federal funds. <br /> Surface Transportation and Uniform Relocation Assistance Act of 1987, Public Law 100-17,April 2, <br /> 1987 <br /> This bill, which addresses highway improvement, planning and research throughout the United States, <br /> also declares that States are required to identify historic bridges listed in the National Bridge Inventory. <br /> Furthermore, it requires the Transportation Research Board to review and develop rehabilitation <br /> standards for historic bridges, as well as setting forth minimum allocations for each state for the <br /> purposes of transportation planning and research. <br /> Program Comment for Common Post-1945 Concrete and Steel Bridges <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.